User talk:Danglingdiagnosis

Welcome to Wikipedia. You have done some most valuable editing to caesarean section. Thanks for your help. Maustrauser 02:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drv for List of extraordinary diseases and conditions

An AfD for this article, which you participated in, was recently closed as "no consensus." I have request a deletion review here [1].Bali ultimate (talk) 16:29, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note

A request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Rorschach test has been filed with the Mediation Committee (MedCom). You have been named as a party in this request. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rorschach test and then indicate in the "Party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate in the mediation or not.

Mediation is a process where a group of editors in disagreement over matters of article content are guided through discussing the issues of the dispute (and towards developing a resolution) by an uninvolved editor experienced with handling disputes (the mediator). The process is voluntary and is designed for parties who disagree in good faith and who share a common desire to resolve their differences. Further information on the MedCom is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee; the policy the Committee will work by whilst handling your dispute is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy; further information on Wikipedia's policy on resolving disagreements is at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes.

If you would be willing to participate in the mediation of this dispute but wish for its scope to be adjusted then you may propose on the case talk page amendments or additions to the list of issues to be mediated. Any queries or concerns that you have may be directed to an active mediator of the Committee or by e-mailing the MedCom's private mailing list (click here for details).

Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission.

Thank you, –xeno^talk

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rorschach test.

For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 21:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Note: I am uncertain why I was included in this request for mediation. I don't think I should be a party to it. It was opened and closed in too short of a period for me to become aware or involved in it. No one has accused me of any wrong doing, and to my knowledge, I have not offended anyone. I do my best to stay on topic and avoid ad hominem arguments. I do very well with this. Danglingdiagnosis (talk) 00:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Danglingdiagnosis. You have new messages at Fritzpoll's talk page.
Message added 16:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fritzpoll (talk) 16:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Less knowledgeable

Yes, I agree. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN notification.

There is a proposal concerning you at WP:AN#Topic ban proposal. You should have been notified by the original poster. → ROUX ₪ 06:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Topic banned

I have reviewed the discussion on WP:AN regarding the topic ban proposal against you. This message is to inform you that by community consensus, you are indefinitely prohibited from adding, removing, or altering in any way the display of images depicting the Rorschach Test and from initiating or participating in any community input process to achieve this end. In the future, please be mindful of your actions and do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Sincerely, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:53, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Point of order, I think this is too hasty. Danglingdiagnosis has not yet had a chance to respond. → ROUX ₪ 18:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully disagree with Roux (talk · contribs) here, the discussion ran its course, and had a clear and very strong consensus. The determination by King of Hearts (talk · contribs) was well within bounds and certainly appropriate. -- Cirt (talk) 18:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the consensus is clear--and given that I agree with the consensus, one hopes that should indicate how strongly I feel about this. We don't try people in absentia here; users are always given a chance to defend themselves. DD hasn't logged in since before the topic ban proposal was posted. Even just in terms of playing fair, the closure should have waited until he had a chance to respond. As I just said at KoH's tpage, you can bet your bippy there will be an appeal of this, and it will just generate more silliness. That isn't the main reason I think this was closed too fast, however. → ROUX ₪ 19:05, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Danglingdiagnosis. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 00:51, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute Resolution IRC office hours.

Hello there. As you expressed interest in hearing updates to my research in the dispute resolution survey that was done a few months ago, I just wanted to let you know that I am hosting an IRC office hours session this coming Saturday, 28th July at 19:00 UTC (approximately 12 hours from now). This will be located in the #wikimedia-office ^connect IRC channel - if you have not participated in an IRC discussion before you can connect to IRC here.

Regards, User:Szhang (WMF) (talk) 07:01, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Involuntary health consequences listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Involuntary health consequences. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Involuntary health consequences redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 17:55, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]