User talk:EllsworthSchmittendorf
EllsworthSchmittendorf, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi EllsworthSchmittendorf! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sacred Heart College, Ballarat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Damascus College Ballarat
- added a link pointing to St. Paul's College
- St. Paul's College, Ballarat
- added a link pointing to Christian Brothers
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Phoenix P-12 Community College
[edit]Hello, EllsworthSchmittendorf,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Phoenix P-12 Community College should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoenix P-12 Community College .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, --Mr.Luther34-- 16:49, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Phoenix P-12 Community College
[edit]Hello EllsworthSchmittendorf,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Phoenix P-12 Community College for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Mr.Luther34-- 16:49, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sheep Hills, Victoria, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.victorianplaces.com.au/sheep-hills.
It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Federation University Australia into University of Ballarat. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — — Diannaa (talk) 22:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Archduchess Maria of Austria (1584–1649), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Elisabeth of Austria and Catherine of Foix. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Religion, Religious listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Religion, Religious. Since you had some involvement with the Religion, Religious redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Traditionalist (talk) 13:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Safran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Host. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 13 May
[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the List of oldest people by country page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
[edit]The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
- Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
In fact, you need to explain all your changes in the last few hours as none of them make sense. I see that you only joined WP:NZ a matter of hours ago and immediately started changing importance ratings. Please desist as it could be taken as vandalism. MurielMary (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for your message! I responded to you on the wikiproject page. Don't worry I'll delete EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 09:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, EllsworthSchmittendorf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit] Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Wyndham Central College a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Hut 8.5 14:34, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
Warracknabeal Wheatbelt
[edit]If you reinsert it will you then please make sure that you also add a definition of what it is supposed to mean - otherwise it is precisely not informative at all, but only confusing. I didnt know what "wheatbelt" meant, when I looked it up it said the Wheatbelt was in western Australia. Warracknabeal is not in Western Australia. Also a source would be good.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 08:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- OK, don't worry about it. I found some information and created the article about the Wheatbelt (Australia).·maunus · snunɐɯ· 09:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hey Maunus! Thanks for voicing your concerns. Wheatbelt (or wheat belt) is a word I here all the time, especially in regards to the Wimmera. I found it in the dictionary here: [1]. Here is an article I found about Warracknabeal about it [2]. I'll cite it in the page :) EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 11:38, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- BTW Maunus, the new page you've created is a bit odd. I'm sure there is no national wheatbelt and I've never heard of an "Australian wheatbelt". You've only cited one source, and even it is named "Wheat Belt Regions of Australia" - it mentions multiple different ones (including the one Warracknabeal is in) and mentions no national one. Maybe you should reconsider the purpose of the page or make a new one under "Australian wheatbelt regions" (or something similar). If you don't think so, then I'll probably put this up for discussion in the Aus wikiproject sometime so it can be clearer :) EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 11:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm, well I was considering it a single belt around the soutthern and eastern rim of the continent even if it is interrupted. Feel free to change the page as you see fit. The problem was adding "wheatbelt" as a descriptor of a town in East Australia when Wikipedia only recognized the Western Wheatbelt region. I am not going to do more with this, but please do improve however you can.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 14:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
New Challenge for Oceania and Australia
[edit]Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Red House Theater copyright problem
[edit]Some of the material you included in the above article was copied from http://www.redhouse.taipei/info_en.aspx and http://www.cntraveler.com/stories/2015-03-03/what-do-do-in-taipei-asia-most-lgbt-friendly-city, which are copyright web pages. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, EllsworthSchmittendorf. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Poor, Poverty listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Poor, Poverty. Since you had some involvement with the Poor, Poverty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, EllsworthSchmittendorf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Self-Esteem, Self-Love listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Self-Esteem, Self-Love. Since you had some involvement with the Self-Esteem, Self-Love redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Melville Street, Hobart for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melville Street, Hobart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Lithopsian (talk) 13:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Brisbane Street, Hobart for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brisbane Street, Hobart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Patrick Street, Hobart for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Street, Hobart until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
"Supper, Lord's" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Supper, Lord's has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § Supper, Lord's until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 23:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Request for applications for position of Wikipedian-at-Large, Aotearoa New Zealand
[edit]Kia ora! The Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand User Group invites you to read about the call for applications for a Wikipedian-at-Large for Aotearoa New Zealand in 2024. Group members are happy to explain the process and discuss ideas with interested editors.
Sent by Zippybonzo on behalf of MurielMary using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 06:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
"Church Officers" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Church Officers has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 17 § Church Officers until a consensus is reached. This discussion also involves another redirect you created, Officers, Church. A7V2 (talk) 06:12, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay
[edit]
Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.
Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.
Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, EllsworthSchmittendorf. Thank you for your work on Renée O'Connell-Mikhailovskaya. Rusalkii, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Interesting historical character, thank you for the article. And I thought my 13-letter Slavic monstrosity of a last name was bad!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rusalkii}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
