User talk:Erock23432

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Erock23432 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

74.77.134.184 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Disruptive editing: continued uploading if non-free and unsourced content despite final warning

Blocking administrator: Ponyo (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You are not autoblocked; you are blocked directly and must address your actions before an unblock can be considered. Kuru (talk) 9:19 pm, 19 April 2011, Tuesday (3 months, 30 days ago) (UTC−4)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Erock23432 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did that stuff a long time ago. Now i know what Wikipedia is and Read Wikipedia Guidelines. I will never do any inapproprite behavior again. I am sorry for what i have done. I did'nt know what i was doing, but now i do.

Decline reason:

First of all, April is hardly "a long time ago". More important, you created your most recent block-evading account as recently as two days ago, so I've blocked your IP for a while too. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:34, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blanking

You may not remove declined unblock requests while you remain blocked. TN X Man 19:32, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Erock23432 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I've been blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.

Decline reason:

This is such a lame unblock request that it would be declined even if you hadn't just been caught evading this block yet again. I would suggest that the standard offer for blocked users is probably your best bet at this point. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: the most recent block-evading sockpuppet of this user is User:New Living Wiki Editor, blocked two days ago. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:21, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lindsay Fleay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lindsay Fleay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lindsay Fleay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (talk) 01:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caillou's Holiday Movie Soundtrack Cover.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Caillou's Holiday Movie Soundtrack Cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Caillou's Favorite Songs moved to draftspace

An article you created, Caillou’s Favorite Songs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CaillouFan (talk) 01:36, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted, as Caillou's Favorite Songs should never have been moved to draft-space. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Caillou's Favorite Songs Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Caillou's Favorite Songs Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. CaillouFan (talk) 11:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tag was reverted, as, due to the reversal of the previous section, it's no longer orphaned. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Caillou's Favorite Songs Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Caillou's Favorite Songs Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]