User talk:Foothill194

Artesia Transit moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Artesia Transit. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 09:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Arvin Transit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freightliner. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Artesia Transit (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Artesia Transit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Foothill194! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Foothill Transit, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on City of Commerce Transit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page City of Commerce Transit, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability and level of detail

Hi Foothill194, I've noticed lately that you have been adding a great deal of detail to lists of bus routes and bus fleets. Please remember several things:

Per the verifiability policy, all information should be cited to reliable sources. You often add information without a citation, or with a citation that does not support the information. (For example, in this edit, you added a bus fleet table with a citation to a web page that doesn't contain any details about the bus fleet.) If you cannot support a claim with a citation to a reliable source, do not add it.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia - a source of general factual information - not a travel guide or a railfan/busfan spotter's guide. Details such as the powertrain of all buses in a fleet, and specific service details for bus routes, are generally not suitable for Wikipedia. For most bus operators, the only details needed in the route list are the route number and name; the list I added at GTrans is a good example for you to follow.

I understand that this may be frustrating to you, but these policies are an important part of keeping Wikipedia a high-quality and reliable encyclopedia. If you want to contribute to a wiki intended specifically for transit fans, you may find Transit Wiki or CPTDB Wiki more to your liking. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing links

Why are you removing links to bus routes like you did on Harbor Freeway station? -- RickyCourtney (talk) 03:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Foothill Transit, you may be blocked from editing. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diesel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at North County Transit District. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 16:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this a final-final warning: if you continue to add unsourced (or flat-out uncitable) material to transit agency articles (or just in general), sanctions will be sought against you. You have received several warnings before for this very reason, and it seems that you completely disregard them. The WP:No original research and WP:Verifiability policies are most relevant here. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 18:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting links

Hi, I noticed in an edit you made to OC Bus split the names of the buses into separate links that are right next to each other, making it hard to tell that its actually two different links. Mxdanger (talk) 09:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Artesia Transit

Hello, Foothill194. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artesia Transit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Artesia Transit (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Artesia Transit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 02:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]