User talk:Geschichte/2020-2021

I will usually reply on this page only.

Archives:

Request for draft

Hello User:Geschichte, as you deleted the article Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf, i request you to please move this page to draft so that i may add more reliable sources and make the article better, Thank You.Indimpdd (talk) 12:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Sérgio Trindade

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sérgio Trindade. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Pesqara (talk) 14:55, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Soulmate Project

Hi! Can you please delete The Soulmate Project article? That show was cancelled too because of the pandemic. Thanks! -152.32.113.251 (talk) 06:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:MetropolisKnight

Surprised you removed the CSD tag, this user page mostly has links to porn. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I admit I first and foremost checked whether the user had contributions, not so much the contents of the page. There has been a couple of cases where the U5 criterion has been used on users who seem to have more than "little or no" contributions. The G3 might have been more fitting though. Geschichte (talk) 08:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bengemen

Can user:Bengemen please be blocked ASAP. CLCStudent (talk) 20:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Magnus Midtbø

The article Magnus Midtbø has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 17jiangz1 (talk) 17:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PROD's on Jeremy Lenaerts & Brad Tucker

Hi Geschichte, I have removed your PROD's on these two players as they have both made appearances for teams in notable leagues under WP:NRU. Regards. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this could be mentioned in the articles? I.e. actual appearances for Narbonne, Mitre Cup etc. But I have no strong sentiments on this. Geschichte (talk) 11:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add some stats to the pages, they're just poor pages in general to be honest, the other two PROD's you've done are fine and thank you for those. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 12:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of a page

hello. please delete this page again. Best--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 16:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snoopy's siblings

Hi, can you please contact the article creator when you nominate an article for AfD? It seems as if I created this (in my very early days, it isn't even on my watchlist apparetly), and it looks as if you didn't drop me a note about it. Fram (talk) 15:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G4 Speedy Deletion nomination of Category:Places named after Thomas Jefferson

Hello, You recently removed the G4/speedy delete tag I had added with the edit summary as "the discussion was so long ago, please take to new AFD." It was deleted after a full discussion just last year (2019). Did you per chance, misread the date? RevelationDirect (talk) 00:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, since the db-g4 linked straight to a discussion from 2006. No deleted edits came up either. They come up now... Geschichte (talk) 01:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should I re-add the tag with the correct link, or what's the next step? RevelationDirect (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can probably re-add the tag with the correct link, yes. Someone with a script that will remove the category from the articles needs to delete this. Geschichte (talk) 10:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for your help! RevelationDirect (talk) 00:50, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tags removed

Hi :) I was a bit surprised to see that you'd removed the notability tag and speedy request from Paulo Gali, without explaining why (the edit note merely says 'cleanup'). If you thought the speedy was heavy-handed, by all means object, but please at least give your reason so others (myself included) can learn from you. As for notability, I still think that's borderline at best: I don't know if any of the (few) matches this chap has appeared in satisfy the FIFA 'Tier 1' requirement in WP:NFOOTY, but even if they do, that surely doesn't guarantee notability, only creates presumption in favour of it. The sources aren't entirely convincing, either - they don't even agree on his birth date - so I'm really not sure from where in your view the notability derives so clearly. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

International matches. Geschichte (talk) 09:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Australian footballers

Hello - can you please think about stopping your mass nominations of Australian female footballers for deletion? It is becoming annoying and looks like you have something against there being any articles. Why not think about improving some articles instead? Deus et lex (talk) 12:40, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no, as these articles should not have been created in the first place. However, as a courtesy I will create 5 Women in Red requested articles in the next day. Geschichte (talk) 13:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here they are: ‎Stephanie Santer, ‎‎Camilla Borsotti, Lucia Mazzotti, ‎Giulia Gianesini, Silvia Biondini, Maria Costanza Moroni. Will you do the same? Geschichte (talk) 16:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Norwegian Nobel Committee has been nominated for listification

Category:Norwegian Nobel Committee has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, we meet again; small world. Back when you created this cat in 2009, you had a header that it was for "Chairpersons and secretaries of the Norwegian Nobel Committee" but it ended up getting populated with all members so I created a separate chairperson category. Your input is welcome! - 01:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Page moved to draft

Hello User:Geschichte, I am not quite sure why the page Chinonso Offor was moved to draft. I wouldn't mind some clarification! Chinonso has played in European competitions. Why does he need to have played a game in the MLS to qualify for a Wiki page? Hazelnike (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)(talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is common practice for players that will soon meet Wikipedia guidelines. See the page history of Victor Boniface or Egil Selvik, for instance. The Latvian league, where Offor has played so far, is part-amateur. See for instance this: [1] You have included coverage about him, which is good, it seems WP:ROUTINE so it alone can't get him back in mainspace. But the page has not been deleted, just stored. Geschichte (talk) 17:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian actors

Hi Geschichte, you recently thanked me for creating a couple of articles on Norwegian actors and this made me wonder, were they articles that you had planned to create yourself? I am merely curious to know if you had any interest in those particular topics, that's all :) Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had not planned them per se, it's just that I've seen Wikipedia lag behind on newer Norwegian entertainment. I have tried to amend this by writing up some tv series articles. Geschichte (talk) 08:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 FC Winterthur season

Hallo, you participated in this discussion in its early stages. Therefore, I would take the liberty to ask you if you would like to review 2014–15 FC Winterthur season again. In the meantime, I have added texts and citations. Perhaps you would like to add a new comment, and perhaps with a couple of suggestions, to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 FC Winterthur season discussion page. Your opinion would be appreciated. Thank you very much for your participation and please feel free to delete this message from your page, if you so wish. Thanks again and kindest greetings from Switzerland --Huligan0 (talk) 22:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Excuse me, but what's this supposed to mean, exactly? The use of parentheses is currently deprecated for this type of article. Avilich (talk) 02:28, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The category is half-and-half, not clear-cut enough for G6 cleanup Geschichte (talk) 09:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It will be one clear-cut one day as all pages are moved to their correct target, but this requires that I be allowed to proceed here. Avilich (talk) 13:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True, but an RFD or requested move, something, can also do the trick. Geschichte (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aidan Barlow

Hello! Good spot on the Aidan Barlow/Stoke City news. However, it looks like it was only a trial - Stoke referred to a trialist in the Leeds United U23 match, for example. See: [2]. I can't find anything to suggest he was signed, either. RPSwp (talk) 00:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Josef Aschbacher

I don't know what you are trying to insinuate with that comment at my AFD. I have a problem with people trying to promote the subject with sentences like "he has an accomplished international career in space, with more than three decades of combined work experience". I have a problem with people using Facebook as a source for a non-notable award. That article is more of a glorified CV than an encyclopedia entry. As a Wikipedia editor, you should look at the article history and check which editor's only edits were to promote the subject and not which editor is trying to keep the encyclopedia free of PR junk. Teemu.cod (talk) 06:39, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was a WP:CIVIL comment, but thanks for your contributions and thanks in advance for improving Wikipedia even further in 2021. Geschichte (talk) 08:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andreas Roth (runner)

The article Andreas Roth (runner) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NTRACK, WP:GNG

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Due to a confusing histmerge, it's not clear to me whether you or Spaicol should be considered the page creator. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK! It was created since he competed on the highest level of the world in 2014 - there were no higher-level meets than the Euros. This used to be the inclusion guideline for athletics. But I'll add more GNG stuff! Geschichte (talk) 05:14, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm reading NTRACK correctly, it says that an athlete needs to place in the top 8 of a Euro Athletics Championship tournament, but I'm not very familiar with track and field and will defer. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That might be true. It's a pretty random cutoff, crafted by some random editors, however it would be borderline suitable to apply on the European Indoor Championships :) Geschichte (talk) 06:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosguill, I found the criterion I was thinking of: WP:SPORTCRIT. It includes athletes that have "participated in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level". Athletics is a very heterogenous sport. The road race circuit (marathons) is probably the most professionalized. Athletes up to and including the Diamond League circuit are semi-professional, and on top world level there is also a very large number of college students (in the US), who are amateur by definition. Either way, it's the highest level of the sport that counts. Athletes' performances can vary greatly year by year, and as such the "highest level" is not a single event like the quadrennial Olympics, but the top competitions in each and every year. According to the easy-to-measure quality mark of performances, the European Championships holds the highest level of all non-worldwide events. In addition to this, prolific high-level competitors at Central American, South American, African and Asian level are presumed to meet WP:GNG in their countries, also taking WP:Countering systemic bias into consideration. Geschichte (talk) 10:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to remove the PROD if you think it's appropriate on SPORTCRIT grounds. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:48, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to add GNG stuff as well! So as to avoid status quo, but instead make an improvement Geschichte (talk) 20:46, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello friend.

Can we do anything about last speedy deletions of three articles (see in my talk page), please? And also the files of Loukas Barlos and Dimitris Melissanidis also in my talk page.

Also if you want any help about Greek football and articles let me know please.

Thanks a lot. GRanemos1 (talk) 19:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the files: who took the picture and where did they appear? The Barlos one looks like it might be from the 1970s-1980s? Geschichte (talk) 21:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The deletions happened because the articles were mostly copied from a source. Do you agree that the text was more or less copied? Geschichte (talk) 21:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to adopt GRanemos1? He has serious problems with our rules and guidelines, but seems to trust you, and you seem to share a significant amount of his interests. ◅ Sebastian 11:15, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dieudonné Disi

Look this. Thank you. --З.Вукобрат (talk) 20:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What about it? Geschichte (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weltfussball → worldfootball.net

Hi there. I often come across articles about footballers created by you. Good work! There's one thing I noticed: you seem to frequently use weltfussball.de which is a good source. worldfootball.net is the same thing in English so it's probably the better choice for the English Wikipedia. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True, I started using it sometime this spring! Geschichte (talk) 07:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. That's great! :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:37, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROD notifications

Hello, Geschichte,

You recently tagged a lot of New York stub articles to be proded. In the future, could you follow the PROD instructions that "You should notify the article's creator or other significant contributors by adding the {{subst:Proposed deletion notify|Name of page}} tag or other appropriate text to contributor talk pages.". It's a courtesy to inform the page creator when you tag a page for deletion (CSD, PROD or AFD) in case they have questions about the tagging and to let them know what has happened to pages they have created. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If you use Twinkle to tag pages, it will automatically post a notification on the page creator's talk page which is very handy. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:37, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Derrick Shapande

The article Derrick Shapande has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Leagues played in are not fully professional per WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~RAM (talk) 22:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'm curious as to your reasoning for removal of the page. The requirements in WP:NFOOTY, and the list on the associated wikiproject of fully professional leagues clearly do not meet the notability criteria. Is there another guideline that I have missed that the page satisfies?

Thank you! If I'm not familiar with a criteria I'd love to be able to go educate myself! ~RAM (talk) 23:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I gave the reason in the edit summary, the player is an international/capped player. Geschichte (talk) 08:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultras Suryoye Göteborg

The consensus was for redirect and that is what you have done...but your AFD closing comment is 'delete'. Please can you clarify? Giant Snowman 11:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basswood Pond

I think you can remove the deletion nomination from Basswood Pond. It will be improved further too. Most of the ones youve been nominating for deletion, I planned on adding all the info but never got around to it. Also please work with me and notify me when you add this to a page ive been a main author to. Thanks -420Traveler (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the contrary, please reconsider adding articles about every geographic feature that exists, that nobody would know from a hole in the ground. It's a lot of work to clean up after it. Geschichte (talk) 08:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomi Markovski

The article Tomi Markovski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Football player and manager who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 12:57, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tomi Markovski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomi Markovski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomi Markovski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BlameRuiner (talk) 17:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Geschichte. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Activist (talk) 04:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PRODs & editor notifications

Hello, Geschichte,

I see you are PRODding a lot of marginal articles but for some reason, you are not posting notices on the talk page of the page creator informing them. Twinkle should do this automatically whenever you use it to tag a page for deletion. It makes the process very easy. I think it's a nice courtesy to notify a page creator when an article they have created has been tagged for deletion. I know you are very experienced but perhaps you could make this part of your tagging process. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have a point, but it's usually the same editor for all of them. The California spammer is inactive, and the New York mass creator also seems aware of the prod tagging. Geschichte (talk) 20:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Przemysław Zabawski" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Przemysław Zabawski. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 30#Przemysław Zabawski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. SFB 19:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guðbjörn Tryggvason

The article Guðbjörn Tryggvason has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG as he hasn't played in a WP:FPL league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 22:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Jordan (sprinter)

The article Thomas Jordan (sprinter) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for merging the article

Hi, I found the articles should be merged, but I don't know how to find the consensus. Can you help me? I request Manuel Carrascalão House massacre should be merge into Manuel Carrascalão. The reason is too short and unreferenced. Thank you. --Tensa Februari (talk) 08:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The massacre article hasn't had a significant edit in 9 years, so you can be bold and carry out the merger. What you do then, is to copy-paste the valuable information into the biography. Make sure to state in the edit summary "merged from Manuel Carrascalão House massacre". Then you redirect the latter page to the biography. Geschichte (talk) 09:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henning Bue Aamodt

The article Henning Bue Aamodt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY, no evidence of WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Markus Aanesland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Markus Aanesland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Aanesland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Knut Aga, Jr.

The article Knut Aga, Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FOOTY, no evidence of WP:GNG coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shåresh Ahmadi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shåresh Ahmadi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shåresh Ahmadi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aleksander Akerjordet

The article Aleksander Akerjordet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pål Henning Albertsen

The article Pål Henning Albertsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY, no evidence of WP:GNG-level non-routine coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Aligo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Aligo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Aligo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jan Tore Amundsen (footballer, born 1968)

The article Jan Tore Amundsen (footballer, born 1968) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stein Amundsen

The article Stein Amundsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arild Andersen (footballer)

The article Arild Andersen (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nils Petter Andersen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nils Petter Andersen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nils Petter Andersen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carl Axel Andreassen

The article Carl Axel Andreassen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eivind Andreassen

The article Eivind Andreassen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kenneth Andreassen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenneth Andreassen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Andreassen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Svein Are Andreassen

The article Svein Are Andreassen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Helge Aune

The article Helge Aune has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ruben Bakke

The article Ruben Bakke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cornelius Bencsik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cornelius Bencsik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornelius Bencsik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian top men's football league and WP:FPL

Per WP:FPL the Norwegian men's top flight is only listed as 'fully professional' from 2001. Although I suspect this is quite generous and the actual cut-off should be later - do you happen to know the relevant date? If so you could add it (with evidence) to the discussion. Thanks, Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:05, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which discussion? The cutoff would be around the transition from "1. divisjon" to "Eliteserien" in the early 1990s. On the other hand, it is true that the league did not have such as level of professionalism in the 1980s, but the more prolific players would meet WP:GNG. Geschichte (talk) 16:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any evidence for this you can add it to the research here. Thanks, Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Helge Aune for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helge Aune is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helge Aune until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aleksander Akerjordet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleksander Akerjordet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksander Akerjordet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aleksander Akerjordet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aleksander Akerjordet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksander Akerjordet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pål Henning Albertsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pål Henning Albertsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pål Henning Albertsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Knut Aga, Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knut Aga, Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knut Aga, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jan Tore Amundsen (footballer, born 1968) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jan Tore Amundsen (footballer, born 1968) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Tore Amundsen (footballer, born 1968) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stein Amundsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stein Amundsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stein Amundsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arild Andersen (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arild Andersen (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arild Andersen (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carl Axel Andreassen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Axel Andreassen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Axel Andreassen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 16:57, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruben Bakke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruben Bakke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruben Bakke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs and FPL

There was a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues#Norway, after which it became apparent that the Eliteserien only became fully pro in 2001. If you have evidence to the contrary then please present it there. As it stands any player who appeared in the league before that date fails NFOOTBALL... Giant Snowman 19:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are misrepresenting the discussion to say the league became fully pro in 2001. There is no evidence that it did. The 'fully professionalism' of the league after 2000 is a Schrödinger's cat: we don't know if or when it became "fully professional" and likely never will. Just like Sweden, the Dutch first and second tiers and the Scottish top tier and Bhutan etc. etc. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BBDS, are you forgetting your own sub-section entitled 'Proposal: the year 2000 as a tentative cut-off date for 'fully professionalism' in the top Norwegian men's football league' and then editors (including myself) agreeing that we should class it as fully pro from 2001 onwards and then the list being edited accordingly to reflect that? I am not misrepresenting anything. Your bad faith here is astonishing. Giant Snowman 21:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ørjan Berg Johansen

The article Ørjan Berg Johansen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stein Berg Johansen

The article Stein Berg Johansen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arild Berg

The article Arild Berg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Bjerk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Bjerk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Bjerk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trond Bjørndal

The article Trond Bjørndal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Even Blakstad

The article Even Blakstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ingve Bøe

The article Ingve Bøe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arne Bonde (footballer)

The article Arne Bonde (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philip Borgen

The article Philip Borgen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arild Berg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arild Berg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arild Berg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ousseynou Boye for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ousseynou Boye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ousseynou Boye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Svein Tore Brandshaug for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Svein Tore Brandshaug is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svein Tore Brandshaug until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ståle Bratseth

The article Ståle Bratseth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG, doesn't inherit notability from his illustrious brother

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dag Petter Breivik

The article Dag Petter Breivik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daniel Hrcka Brøndberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Hrcka Brøndberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Hrcka Brøndberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Buer

The article Tom Buer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ulf Camitz

The article Ulf Camitz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elias Dahlberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elias Dahlberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elias Dahlberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles Berstad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Berstad, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Berstad (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Buer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Buer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Buer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 13:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stein Berg Johansen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stein Berg Johansen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stein Berg Johansen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Øystein Drillestad

The article Øystein Drillestad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ola Dybwad-Olsen, Jr.

The article Ola Dybwad-Olsen, Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable: fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dag Eidsvik

The article Dag Eidsvik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christoffer Eliassen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christoffer Eliassen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christoffer Eliassen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christer Ellefsen

The article Christer Ellefsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Svein Enersen

The article Svein Enersen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG failure

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stig Engen

The article Stig Engen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Morten Kjær Enger

The article Morten Kjær Enger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG (unless he's done anything notable in his day job as a lawyer)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andreas Evjen

The article Andreas Evjen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as all his top division appearances came before the Norwegian men's league was supposed to be "fully professional". More importantly fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rino Falk Larsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rino Falk Larsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rino Falk Larsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hallgeir Finbråten

The article Hallgeir Finbråten has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ole Petter Fjørtoft

The article Ole Petter Fjørtoft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kjell Rune Flo

The article Kjell Rune Flo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Fodstad

The article Tom Fodstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY fail

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Knut Erik Folland

The article Knut Erik Folland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caleb Francis

The article Caleb Francis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG as a football player, there is also insufficient evidence of any notability as a commentator

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frode Fredriksen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frode Fredriksen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frode Fredriksen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henning Friise

The article Henning Friise has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Markus Furseth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Markus Furseth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markus Furseth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rolf Furuly

The article Rolf Furuly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vidar Geitle

The article Vidar Geitle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Espen Granli

The article Espen Granli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tor Andre Grenersen

The article Tor Andre Grenersen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lars Grevskott

The article Lars Grevskott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tommy Grønvold

The article Tommy Grønvold has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roar Gulliksen

The article Roar Gulliksen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sindre Gundersen

The article Sindre Gundersen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gestur Gylfason

The article Gestur Gylfason has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tor Arild Haddal

The article Tor Arild Haddal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joakim Hagabakken for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joakim Hagabakken is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joakim Hagabakken until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stian Hagelund

The article Stian Hagelund has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Knut Helge Hagen

The article Knut Helge Hagen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petter Hagen

The article Petter Hagen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Espen Hagh

The article Espen Hagh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Norwegian people of Macedonian descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Norwegian people of Macedonian descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Systematic PROD of Geographic Features

I'm seeing a lot of lakes, mountains, etc especially in New York and elsewhere in the USA with PROD from you. In most of these cases the entity is recognized and named tracked by the USGS thus instead of deletions they should be redirected to articles and lists for the region according to WP:GEOLAND. These all should be suggested to merge for consolidation rather than proposing deletions as that fits more with the Gazetteer and the objectives of the respective geographic Wikiprojects. I've systematically been tagging the articles for visibility in their respective feature and region WikiProjects projects to bring better attention to their existence to start and working on a strategy for WikiProject Lakes which could be replicated in other features, but I need to write this up for sharing. What do you think about shifting from PROD to merge? Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mauritian emigrants to Norway

A tag has been placed on Category:Mauritian emigrants to Norway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Gjemnes

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Gjemnes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Espen Hagh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Espen Hagh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Espen Hagh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roar Gulliksen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roar Gulliksen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roar Gulliksen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eivind Andreassen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eivind Andreassen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eivind Andreassen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andreas Evjen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andreas Evjen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Evjen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Johan Hammarström

The article Johan Hammarström has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bjørn Tore Hansen (footballer, born 1975)

The article Bjørn Tore Hansen (footballer, born 1975) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lars Waage Hansen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lars Waage Hansen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Waage Hansen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tommy Hansen (footballer, born 1967)

The article Tommy Hansen (footballer, born 1967) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tommy Hansen (footballer, born 1971)

The article Tommy Hansen (footballer, born 1971) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trond Vidar Hansen

The article Trond Vidar Hansen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raymond Hardy

The article Raymond Hardy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Glenn Hartmann

The article Glenn Hartmann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bernt Haugen

The article Bernt Haugen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andreas Hauger

The article Andreas Hauger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Hedman

The article Peter Hedman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asbjørn Helgeland

The article Asbjørn Helgeland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trond Helgesen

The article Trond Helgesen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anders Hella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anders Hella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Hella until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tobias Henanger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tobias Henanger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tobias Henanger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Børge Hernes

The article Børge Hernes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Berg Hestad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Berg Hestad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Berg Hestad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:39, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trond Hjelle

The article Trond Hjelle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lars Hjorth

The article Lars Hjorth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jørn Holmen (footballer)

The article Jørn Holmen (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stein Holsvik

The article Stein Holsvik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 00:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Göran Holter

The article Göran Holter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cato Holtet

The article Cato Holtet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ervin Horn

The article Ervin Horn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Truls Hovland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Truls Hovland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truls Hovland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Martin Hummervoll for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Hummervoll is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Hummervoll until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 17:54, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Erik Indrebø

The article John Erik Indrebø has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:35, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stein Arne Ingelstad

The article Stein Arne Ingelstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krister Isaksen

The article Krister Isaksen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ole Gunnar Iversen

The article Ole Gunnar Iversen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 18:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tom Helge Jacobsen

The article Tom Helge Jacobsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erik Johannessen (footballer, born 1971)

The article Erik Johannessen (footballer, born 1971) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gaute Johannessen

The article Gaute Johannessen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Geir Johansen (footballer, born 1968)

The article Geir Johansen (footballer, born 1968) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Truls Nordby Johansen

The article Truls Nordby Johansen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ove Jørstad

The article Ove Jørstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emil Kalsaas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emil Kalsaas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Kalsaas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kjetil Kalve for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kjetil Kalve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kjetil Kalve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jørn Karlsrud

The article Jørn Karlsrud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anders Kiel

The article Anders Kiel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Morten Kihle

The article Morten Kihle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trond Kindervåg

The article Trond Kindervåg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Torbjørn Kjerrgård for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Torbjørn Kjerrgård is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torbjørn Kjerrgård until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anders Klemensson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anders Klemensson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anders Klemensson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sven Kloster

The article Sven Kloster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jan Kokkim

The article Jan Kokkim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sigbjørn Kollnes

The article Sigbjørn Kollnes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mats Holt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mats Holt, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mats Holt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Børge Hernes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Børge Hernes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Børge Hernes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ove Jørstad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ove Jørstad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ove Jørstad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ronny Kristensen

The article Ronny Kristensen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krister Isaksen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krister Isaksen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krister Isaksen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gabriela König

The article Gabriela König has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Loafiewa (talk) 05:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Asbjørn Helgeland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asbjørn Helgeland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asbjørn Helgeland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lars Hjorth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lars Hjorth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Hjorth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gaute Johannessen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaute Johannessen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaute Johannessen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juro Kuvicek

The article Juro Kuvicek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stian Larsen

The article Stian Larsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tor Åge Larsen

The article Tor Åge Larsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steinar Lein

The article Steinar Lein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 20:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Are Lervik

The article Are Lervik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kim Løkke

The article Kim Løkke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rune Lothe

The article Rune Lothe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tore Løvland

The article Tore Løvland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bjørn Ludvigsen

The article Bjørn Ludvigsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kjetil Lundebakken for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kjetil Lundebakken is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kjetil Lundebakken until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Odd Petter Lyngstad

The article Odd Petter Lyngstad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 21:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Odd Petter Lyngstad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Odd Petter Lyngstad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odd Petter Lyngstad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rune Lothe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rune Lothe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rune Lothe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kim Løkke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kim Løkke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Løkke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 15:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Zlatko Kranjčar

On 4 March 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Zlatko Kranjčar, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. TJMSmith (talk) 02:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Eide

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Eide requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:03, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ann Helen Østervold for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ann Helen Østervold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Helen Østervold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request For Draft

Hello User:Geschichte, as you deleted the article RDM (film director), i request you to please move this page to draft so that i may add more reliable sources and make the article better, Thank You.User:Jitheshtony (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nedim Kaleci

Dear Geschichte, I hope this finds you well. Apologies that I couldn't properly support you last year about the Turkish football clubs as you mentioned. But, any other questions, please let me know. I'll kindly ask you help for goalkeeper Nedim Kaleçi to be moved to Nedim Kaleci without any redirection, or deleting the article with letter "ç", please. It was created with absolute good faith but contains a spelling mistake. Correct surname is definitely Kaleci, as it means "goalkeeper" in Turkish language. You may also confirm the identity as per TFF records [3]. Many thanks in advance. Isik (talk) 19:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Solas

Hello. How come you removed Category:France youth international footballers from Daniel Solas? He clearly played for the France U21 team. Paul Vaurie (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hence the Category:France under-21 international footballers. Geschichte (talk) 10:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Ludvig Johansson

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Ludvig Johansson, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!. /Julle (talk) 00:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also for Mergim Laci. /Julle (talk) 01:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PROD notifications

Hello, Geschichte,

I was going through some of the geographic articles you PROD'd and noticed that you don't post notifications of your tagging on the talk page of the article creator which is typically a part of every deletion page tagging. Did this editor ask that you not notify them? Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has become a routine with this creator, who is behind hundreds if not thousands of similar articles. Geschichte (talk) 16:09, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liz is correct, even if it is routine, you still need to notify the creator. -420Traveler (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Weng" related are hoax

Weng (surname) and related are hoax. Without any references and without any reliable sources. Destroy all "Weng" and related. 116.206.12.54 (talk) 01:40, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is incorrect about it? Geschichte (talk) 08:05, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grorud IL.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grorud IL.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 14:13, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ga%C3%ABl_Hiroux

Hello. Why did you delete my draft? Thank you. Paul Vaurie (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I started the article. Geschichte (talk) 11:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Montoya

Hi Geschichte,

Would you be able to explain your reasoning for your closure as redirect on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sebastian Montoya? The nom and one other participant advocated for deletion, and the other participant said effectively delete or merge with Juan Pablo Montoya. I could therefore understand closing as "merge", but now we are left with a redirect to an article with no mention of Sebastian Montoya.

Thanks. A7V2 (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did it as an WP:ATD after both had said delete, as a redirect in effect is a deletion of tha page, but without the article history and content being lost. Especially since the son might become notable in 4-5 years. I do see that the redirected page should be mentioned at the redirect target. Geschichte (talk) 06:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply and edits to Juan Pablo Montoya. I have refined the target of Sebastian Montoya to Juan Pablo Montoya#Personal life also. I was about to do a quick and nasty job of it myself actually but noticed you already had! My original question was more about why you didn't close specifically as "merge" but I suppose this isn't all that much of a merge, and in any case it doesn't really matter. Thanks, A7V2 (talk) 13:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red link categories

Hello, Geschichte,

Please do not add nonexistent, red link categories to pages as you did on Category:US Chaouia managers and other categories. According to WP:REDNO, there should be no red link categories unless you are going to immediately create that category (A page in any Wikipedia namespace should never be left in a red-linked category. Either the category should be created, or else the non-existent category link should be removed or changed to one that exists.}. Adding red link categories to a page just requires other editors to then go and remove them. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:16, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Ethniki top scorers

These are the top goalscorer lists of the Beta Ethniki from 1983 to 1993 and it's up to you to help me with the players:

1983/84

 Dimitris Tsembtibis (Edessa) ............... 21
 Anagnostou (Pierikos) ...................... 16
 Mesimerlis (Edessaikos) .................... 15
 Apostolis Drakopoulos (Panachaiki) ......... 14
 Mitrakos (Atromitos) ....................... 14

1984/85

 Paraskevopoulos (Almopos) .................. 19
 Vakoufaris (Agrotikos A.) .................. 16
 Ioannis Papadopoulos (Edessaikos) .......... 16
 Ioannis Gambetas (Trikala) ................. 16
 Gyftakis (Xanthi) .......................... 15
 Kopanidis (Proodeftiki) .................... 15

1985/86

 Panagiotidis (Naousa) ...................... 21
 Vellios (Edessaikos) ....................... 17
 Vakoufaris (Veria) ......................... 16
 Ioannis Gambetas (Trikala) ................. 16
 Kostas Kottakis (Ionikos) .................. 15
 Mitrakos (Atromitos Ath.) .................. 15
 Moschos (Kavala) ........................... 15
 Vassilis Tzalakostas (Athinaikos) .......... 15

1986/87

 Kostas Kottakis (Ionikos) .................. 20
 Nikos Kriezis (Xanthi) ..................... 18
 Apostolis Drakopoulos (Panachaiki) ......... 16
 Dimitris Koutas (Levadiakos) ............... 14
 Tsakouridis (Makedonikos) .................. 14
 Zisis Tsekos (Panserraikos) ................ 14

1987/88

 Kostas Kottakis (Ionikos) .................. 18
 Dimitris Nolis (Kastoria) .................. 17
 Ioannis Gambetas (Doxa D.) ................. 15
 Krasonis (Athinaikos) ...................... 15
 Zvetkov (Doxa D.) .......................... 14
 Karanikas (Apollonas) ...................... 14

1988/89

 Adamopoulos (Xanthi) ....................... 30
 Keramidas (PAS Giannina) ................... 17
 Velitchkov (Panserraikos) .................. 15
 Vaggelis Kalogeropulos (Panserraikos) ...... 15
 Basbanas (Pierikos) ........................ 14

1989/90

 Alekos Alexandris (Veria) .................. 21
 Georgios Vaitsis (Panachaiki) .............. 17
 Manolis Chandapakis (Niki) ................. 17
 Sofianos (Charavgiakos) .................... 14
 Michalis Alexiadis (Naousa) ................ 12
 Papanikolaou (PAS Giannina) ................ 12

1990/91

 Alekos Alexandris (Veria) .................. 16
 Nikos Tsoleridis (Ap. Kalamaria) ........... 16
 Kostas Konstantinidis (Atromitos) .......... 15
 Sofianos (Ethnikos) ........................ 14
 Vainas (Pierikos) .......................... 12
 Bambas (Ethnikos ........................... 12

1991/92

 Dimitris Nolis (Ap. Kalamaria) ............. 21
 Michalis Alexiadis (Naousa) ................ 13
 Vassilis Tsiartas (Naousa) ................. 13
 Baxevanoglou (Kavala) ...................... 12
 Michalis Ziogas (Ionikos) .................. 12
 Papadopoulos (Argos) ....................... 12

1992/93

 Vassilis Tsanas (Levadiakos) ............... 14
 Zifkovic (Naousa) .......................... 13
 Predrag Mitic (EAR) ........................ 12
 Petrunov (Panserraikos) .................... 12
 Michalis Alexiadis (Naousa) ................ 11
 Jurisic (Atromitos) ........................ 11
 Koic (Levadiakos) .......................... 11
 Michailovic (Giannitsa) .................... 11
 Tsalkintzis (Giannitsa) .................... 11
 Imre Bonda (Olympiakos V.) ................. 11
 Panchev (Panserraikos) ..................... 11

Jolicnikola (talk) 08:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've done two so far. Some clubs need to be written up. Ampelokipi seems pretty notable, and I have Anagennisi Giannitsa sitting in my userspace. Geschichte (talk) 11:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Random AfD Close Request

Hi, June 2, KOAD-LP was nominated for deletion. On June 24, it was closed as a Keep and immediately listed at DRV (that was a mess of a nightmare). So, with a 3-1 Keep !vote, it was relisted at AfD, two more Keep !votes have been added since it's relisting. It's clear, at this point, this is a SNOW Keep.

So, as an admittedly involved editor, I am asking a randomly-chosen and uninvolved admin to, please, close this AfD, which has been up for more than a month. If you'd like it to run a little longer, I'm fine with that too. Thank you for your time. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 21:34, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Expatriate sportspeople in Palestine by nationality

A tag has been placed on Category:Expatriate sportspeople in Palestine by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:42, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EL are not ER

of course, leading marks are not records, you are right. BUT in the word "records", you can put a lot of meanings, including leading marks.--Arorae (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I believe you can't do that. Geschichte (talk) 19:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Portuguese expatriate sportspeople in Colombia

A tag has been placed on Category:Portuguese expatriate sportspeople in Colombia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henri Schoeman (judoka) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henri Schoeman (judoka) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henri Schoeman (judoka) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 16:32, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cameroonian expatriate sportspeople in Armenia

A tag has been placed on Category:Cameroonian expatriate sportspeople in Armenia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Empty categories

Hello, Geschichte,

I noticed you recently deleted some empty categories. Could you instead tag them as CSD C1 empty categories instead of deleting them straight-away? I don't know the situation with these particular categories but often categories are temporarily empty. I'd say of the empty categories I tag each day, 5-10% are not still empty a week later, they need to be untagged and aren't deleted. Of course, if these are page creations of a vandal or blocked editor, take action. But otherwise, it doesn't hurt the categories to sit for a week just in case they don't stay empty. Thank you very much! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz. The categories you nominate on my talk page, are blank because someone vandalizes the articles where I put the categories in the first place. The categories I deleted, were blanked after a discussion which at WT:WPF (maybe archived now) and which transplanted to the creator's talk page.

What I'm wondering is, who is the aforementioned vandal? I don't watch every page I edit. Geschichte (talk) 14:36, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canadian expatriate sportspeople in Qatar

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian expatriate sportspeople in Qatar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rwandan expatriate sportspeople in North Macedonia

A tag has been placed on Category:Rwandan expatriate sportspeople in North Macedonia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:10, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canadian expatriate sportspeople in Qatar

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian expatriate sportspeople in Qatar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geschichte,

Sorry for the repetitive notices. There seems to be a disagreement over whether Goran Miscevic belongs in this category. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:30, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for undeletion

Hello Geschichte (talk · contribs), as per your comment i have requested at undeletion and i have mentioned the details below, DMacks suggested me to contact you so can you move this to draft please. Indimpdd (talk) 07:17, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf

Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I want to work on this article, can someone move this deleted article to draft so that i can add reliable independent sources and make person more notable by adding important references. —Indimpdd (talk) 16:28, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No Responce Indimpdd (talk) 14:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Geschichte (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. DMacks (talk) 15:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rivers

Im making green edits and you are making red edits, which is fine. But instead of trying to sneak them through, could you at least ping me so maybe I can fix them? Thanks and keep up the good work.-420Traveler (talk) 14:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request to send a hoax article to the hoax list

Hello! :) This is regarding the recently deleted article Sequenceome (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sequenceome). You closed this discussion, and that's why I'm contacting you. Is there any way that you could add the article to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia? The article existed since 2007 and I'm pretty sure it was a hoax article. wizzito | say hello! 18:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ivorian emigrants to England

A tag has been placed on Category:Ivorian emigrants to England indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review page that was deleted recently

Please review the page that was marked for speedy deletion and then deleted by you Kiddaan. Kiddaan is one of the digital platforms of the Punjabi film industry. Many pages need its reference and that is why I have created that page like other ones. Name of Kiddaan is requested in every page of Punjabi digital media platforms and website categories. I hope you will help to increase the data of Punjabi film industry by restoring deleted page. LedgeDigital (talk) 13:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to write an article about Kiddaan, you need independent sources that covers the website significantly. Drop primary sources, which are sources published by its creator or the website itself. Using Alexa as a reference doesn't help either when the ranking is very low, such as in this case. Geschichte (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual U

I added https://distance-educator.com/virtual-u-20-released-as-free-download/ as a reference, which is sort of a review. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:42, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geschichte,

You closed this AfD discussion as "Delete" but the Virtual U page showed up in Category:Candidates for uncontroversial speedy deletion so I guess you chose not to delete it when you closed the discussion? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe a little snafu there on my part? More "forgot" than "chose" I presume. Geschichte (talk) 19:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anita Silwal

Hi! You forgot to delete the article. I had hoped anyone could and so someone else would, but it looks like they think you're the best person to do it. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geschichte (talk · contribs), I just came to know that this page that I created before, has been deleted. I would be more than happy to provide evidence if something is missing to support the article, can you please help me understand how we can back the page live. Thank you!

Proposed deletion of Ruhan Işım

The article Ruhan Işım has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:23, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:STUBSPACING

Hi there. WP:STUBSPACING states: "Leave two blank lines between the first stub template and whatever precedes it." I've restored the two blank lines at Nikos Tsoumanis. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nizar Khanfir moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nizar Khanfir, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Olli Harder Assistant Manager

FYI, I've started a general discussion about assistant manager positions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Assistant positions in infoboxes. And it wasn't a "blatant misuse of rollback"- I was going to partial self revert to add back the good part of the content anyway, but was easier for me to revert all then re-add the good bits back (because the infoboxes are fiddly). I believe there is consensus against adding assistant manager roles (but we'll see the outcome of the discussion), and nevertheless the years added were wrong, as he was appointed in December 2019. Please don't assume bad faith. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Dorset & Wilts 2 Central

Hello - you have deleted "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dorset_%26_Wilts_2_Central" which I created recently. The reason given is that it doesn't have sources / references but there is a hyperlink on the page to the RFU Results website which shows this league exists and the teams involved etc. The only began in September so it is new - there are no previous winners or other third party information sources - this is community rugby in England, it doesn't get articles on well known websites or media attention. I don't know how else to prove it's genuine. The https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_rugby_union_system page includes dozens of pages identical to this one, the only difference is most leagues have been in existence for some time. I would appreciate it if the page could be reinstated. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxPower2017 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. From the article history it doesn't seem like I have done anything with this article? Geschichte (talk) 21:08, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for undeletion Ryan Avery (speaker)

Can you move this back to the draft page so I can add reliable sources to the article? I'm having a hard time getting reliable sources that can be accepted by Wikipedia's guidelines. But because of your discussion on the deletion of the article, I will expand more my research and find suitable articles that could back up my claim as Ryan to be a notable person. 14:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azumi121 (talk • contribs)

I think you should start the article from scratch. The consensus in the deletion discussion was that the current sources were spammy, so I don't think that version should be reinstated even in draftspace. Try forgetting about the WP:PUFFERY achievements, Guinness Records and World Championships of Public Speaking, and see if there is something more substantial that Avery is known for. Can you for instance find reputable reviews of his books? If you have a hard time finding reliable sources, though, maybe it's a sign that Avery is not ready for Wikipedia? Geschichte (talk) 14:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

!vote

Sorry I don’t understand what !vote means. Can you please explain what you mean by it and how that is different to vote. Andrewgprout (talk) 08:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's a peculiar custom at Wikipedia, and I totally get that it looks strange to those who are not so immersed in the lingo. The ! at the start of a word is a mathematical expression I believe, and thus !vote means non-vote. It's written like that because AFDs are not a vote, but the discussions are nonetheless stylized somewhat like a vote. The outlining of words such as delete and keep is done for statistical purposes, bots collecting data and whatnot. That being said, when someone nominates an article for deletion, this is counted as a delete opinion/iteration/stance, and should not be repeated below. (An exception exists for "procedural nominations", mostly done on behalf of someone else.) Further opinions/replies from the nominator, which are always welcome in a discussion, should be marked as a comment/reply. Geschichte (talk) 09:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:EC Judo Open

Template:EC Judo Open has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Deancarmeli (talk) 11:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

G. A. Campbell (disambiguation)

I don't see how G. A. Campbell (disambiguation) qualifies as a G14 CSD. There were three entries on the page. One had been deleted at AFD and became a redlink, but that still left two valid bluelinks. It's true that the page could be turned into redirect+hatnote but that wasn't done and still does not require a deletion. SpinningSpark 15:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You want a hatnote from George Ashley Campbell to Chips and Technologies? Geschichte (talk) 15:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I want the deleted page restored. Whether it should be turned into a redirect (which would then also require a hatnote at the target) is a separate issue. SpinningSpark 16:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of G. A. Campbell (disambiguation). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. SpinningSpark 21:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You got a response, incidentally a rhetorical question... Geschichte (talk) 21:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]