User talk:HappyEnder9999

Welcome!

Hello, Behzad Azarmju M.D., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Draft:Biloma. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 06:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biloma has been accepted

Biloma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject!

Welcome to Wikipedia and WikiProject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:

Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any problems. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! ★Gooseflesh12★ (talk) 23:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Behzad Azarmju M.D., and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Soccer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Soccer was changed by Behzad Azarmju M.D. (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891881 on 2018-07-10T02:06:44+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC) {{subst:proposed deletion notify|1=Interval appendectomy|concern=One source, which is selectively cited. Most notable "remains controversial" (source cited is omitted. Not [[WP:MEDRS], WP:WEASEL. All that in four sentences.}} Kleuske (talk) 19:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Passaro's triangle

Hi, I'm Vexations. Behzad Azarmju M.D., thanks for creating Passaro's triangle!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article is almost completely copy/pasted from a copyrighted source. Please rewrite it in your own words.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Vexations (talk) 11:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your page creations

I notice you have created several pages recently, including Duhamel’s theory. When creating pages, please make sure that there are multiple reliable references, to allow other editors to verify the content on the page, and to demonstrate that the general notability guideline is met. On the page relating to Duhamel's theory, it is unclear who "Duhamel" is or what the theory is in detail. Pages with insufficient detail or explanation risk being deleted; you can work on incomplete pages as WP:Drafts in the draft namespace or your userspace (the link will explain those terms). power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duhamel’s theory moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Duhamel’s theory, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 02:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear number moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nuclear number, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pharmacy management system (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pharmacy management system and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pharmacy management system, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Behzad Azarmju M.D.! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demand pacemaker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Discharge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pharmacy management system (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pharmacy management system and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pharmacy management system, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:03, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Software programs for pharmacy workflow management ‎

Given that Draft:Pharmacy management system was declined twice, your decision to recreate the content as Software programs for pharmacy workflow management was not appropriate. I deleted what I considered the most egregious parts of the article, but for now let the article stand. David notMD (talk) 12:04, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The number of prescriptions dispensed in 2016 was 4,450,000,000 in the U.S. and 141,000,000,000 in the world (https://www.statista.com/statistics/238702/us-total-medical-prescriptions-issued/). Almost all went through at least one of the numerous programs that I mentioned their most famous ones. Wikipedia, not only doesn't name even the most used programs, it didn't have a page about such a phenomenon which is a big defect. --Behzad Azarmju M.D. (talk) 10:37, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Behzad Azarmju M.D., you can create articles for those programs if they meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline, and then add a link to those articles from the Pharmacy management system article. However, a good rule of thumb for software articles is to avoid adding a software program to a list unless it already has an article on Wikipedia. (Write the article first.) — Newslinger talk 11:54, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Choosing sources, and taking care in citing them

Would you please start paying attention to WP:MEDRS, and would you PLEASE stop adding bare URL citations that other people need to clean up? It is very easy to format citations. Please take the time to read the note below, and to learn how to do this.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 18:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apex beat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chronic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conduit

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Conduit. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 12:08, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hill test

Hi, I'm Ozzie10aaaa. Behzad Azarmju M.D., thanks for creating Hill test!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. needs more references for verification, as Hill's test did not come up immediately on any source, whatsmore sources given do not indicated page number

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:19, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Your addition to Cuthbertson v. Parichehr case has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Learning Blanket

A tag has been placed on Learning Blanket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Subject of article does not meet WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kb03 (talk) 01:37, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Learning Blanket moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Learning Blanket, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Brad v 01:50, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duhamel’s theory (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs better sources. The fact the guy who came up with this has no page is not encourging

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Duhamel’s theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Duhamel’s theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 08:07, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Behzad Azarmju M.D.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Learning Blanket (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

Subject is a WP:CFORK of the page Holistic Lifelong Learning. Although, I am not sure that HLL is notable for Wikipedia. Anything in this draft can easily fit into that article without creating a separate standalone article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Learning Blanket and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Learning Blanket, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 03:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of English words of Persian origin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Body (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Duhamel’s theory (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I can't find enough coverage in reliable sources about this. However the guy it is named for needs an article and I would quickly approve that as a submission. His theory could be covered within his bio.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Duhamel’s theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Duhamel’s theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 02:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Holistic Lifelong Learning moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Holistic Lifelong Learning, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Citrivescence (talk) 02:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of English words of Persian origin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carcass and Canary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of English words of Persian origin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hullabaloo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of English words of Persian origin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Band and Amass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of English words of Persian origin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nana and Steady (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. - LouisAragon (talk) 21:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, Thanks!

Also, I was wondering if you could help me find a way to edit content boxes on a page like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Technetium-99m&action=submit I don't see any options! Behzad Azarmju M.D. (talk) 22:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Behzad, thank you for your kind response. What do you precisely mean with content boxes? Could you elaborate what you mean by that? Are you perhaps referring to infoboxes?

Best, - LouisAragon (talk) 14:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, not the infoboxes on the right side, I mean the content boxes on the left side (close to the top) that redirects to the following sections/paregraphs on the same page (Table of Contents of a page). Thanks! Behzad Azarmju M.D. (talk) 05:06, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:38, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy

Hello! I noticed you created an article, LATE disease, which already existed at the title Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy, so I've converted it to a redirect. It's also much better to cite reliable medical sources directly rather than to cite what the popular press repeats, and it's not a good idea to cite blogs. Thanks :) – Þjarkur (talk) 16:59, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buzcall.com for example is not a reliable source. – Þjarkur (talk) 15:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nursing care levels

Hello, Behzad Azarmju M.D.,

Thanks for creating Nursing care levels! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on Nursing care levels. Note that the article is currently an "orphan", meaning that no other Wikipedia articles link TO it. This makes the article tough to find for interested readers. See [{WP:DE-ORPHAN]] for pointers.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:31, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Duhamel’s theory

Hello, Behzad Azarmju M.D.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Duhamel’s theory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 14:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sufism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of the pharmacy management systems

Hello, Behzad Azarmju M.D.,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TomCat4680 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, List of the pharmacy management systems, for deletion, because it's impossible to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TomCat4680}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 16:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:List of the pharmacy management systems, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to List of the pharmacy management systems does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 16:40, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Holistic Lifelong Learning concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Holistic Lifelong Learning, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Androgen Insufficiency Syndrome moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Androgen Insufficiency Syndrome, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 08:00, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Androgen insufficiency syndrome has been accepted

Androgen insufficiency syndrome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 14:04, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Holistic Lifelong Learning

Hello, Behzad Azarmju M.D.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Holistic Lifelong Learning".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Social distancing, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You moved Social distancing to Physical distancing without consensus. See discussion on talk page at Talk:Social distancing#Requested move 23 March 2020 Peaceray (talk) 23:40, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fatty acid ratio in food, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:42, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Fatty acid ratio in food, you may be blocked from editing. ... and on Canola oil. Nutrition is about human health, a topic requiring WP:MEDRS reviews. Your sources do not meet this standard. Zefr (talk) 00:10, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Subjective Global Assessment

Hello, Behzad Azarmju M.D.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Subjective Global Assessment".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Toxic changes of neutrophils concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Toxic changes of neutrophils, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Toxic changes of neutrophils

Hello, Behzad Azarmju M.D.. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toxic changes of neutrophils".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of common or similar words in English and Persian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of common or similar words in English and Persian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common or similar words in English and Persian (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pichpich (talk) 23:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Van Gogh syndrome for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Van Gogh syndrome is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van Gogh syndrome until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Darcyisverycute (talk) 11:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]