User talk:Heaney555z
Welcome
[edit]
|
February 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Sukhoi_Su-47#Stealth. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. EWikistTalk 18:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, edited as appropriate. Won't happen again. I just get annoyed when people are trying to protray their fantasy's as fact on an Encyclopedia talk page. - Heaney555z (talk) 18:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
March 2011
[edit]When making major changes to articles, it is prudent to discuss the changes beforehand on the article discussion pages. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC).
May 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Sukhoi PAK FA, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nem1yan (talk) 13:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Oculus Rift images
[edit]Thank you for uploading the Oculus Rift image. However, I note that you have marked it as public domain. Normally, press images are released under fair-use. Oculus themselves claim ownership over the content and do not mark it as public domain. Can you please point to the section on the Oculus website that marks the press images as public domain? Alternatively, if the image is not freely licensed, we'll have to remove the new one and revert back to the previous one. Wikipedia doesn't permit us to use fair-use images when a freely-licensed one is available or could reasonably be made available. --Yamla (talk) 13:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oops, wrong licence. Can you please fix it? I don't know how to edit the licence on wikipedia. Heaney555z (talk) 13:49, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- If it's not actually available under a free license, I'm afraid you'll have to delete it; we can't claim fair-use there. Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion explains how, though I'm not sure if that applies to Wikimedia. You should be able to revert back to the prior image on the article page, but let me know if you'd like my help in doing so. --Yamla (talk) 14:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- But it is available under free licence. If I show an email from Oculus saying I can use it is that fine? Or is even that not enough for Wikipedia? Don't delete the Rift image for some 2012 prototype... Heaney555z (talk) 14:23, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- If you post the body of the email here, I'll take a look. I must admit, I'm not sure how you'd translate that into sufficient proof, but I'm sure there's a way. Note that it's not sufficient for them to grant Wikipedia permission to use the image. It must be freely licensed and available for others, including commercial use. --Yamla (talk) 15:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Heaney. You could request the people who sent you the email to follow the process for donating copyprighted materials. Permission to reuse the image can be registered with an OTRS ticket. Diego (talk) 10:13, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Okay this is quite confusing and I doubt they'll do that (effort), but I believe the issue is that I marked it as public domain and put it on Wiki*media*? If I mark it as fair use and upload directly to English Wikipedia, it'll be fine, right?
- They can use this simple contact form. If you mark it as fair use it will be likely be contested and deleted, as people will soon be able to take free photos wearing the device - either at tech previews or when it is released. Diego (talk) 10:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ignore all the above links, this is the page that people from Oculus can use if they want to donate the image to the project. Diego (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- No, it would not be acceptable for Wikipedia to use a fair-use image. A freely licensed image is already available and it would be fairly easy to produce a new freely licensed image if we are concerned that the existing one is for an older version of the hardware. In summary, no. We cannot use a fair-use image on that page. --Yamla (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ignore all the above links, this is the page that people from Oculus can use if they want to donate the image to the project. Diego (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- They can use this simple contact form. If you mark it as fair use it will be likely be contested and deleted, as people will soon be able to take free photos wearing the device - either at tech previews or when it is released. Diego (talk) 10:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 16 June
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Oculus Rift page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 15 July
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Oculus Rift page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oculus Rift, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Third party and CCP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)