User talk:Helics

User:Helics/Top I never got welcomed :( --Jay Talk's 18:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have. Thank you 21655. --Jay Talk's 18:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

whatz up --Kirsten richardson (talk · contribs)

The sky. --helics (talk · contribs) 17:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Or the ceiling. --Jay Talk's 17:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Helics, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Two One Six Five Five ^τ_ʃ 18:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Turner

See the top of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Iamandrewrice. --Core desat 22:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely and all of your contributions have been deleted. This will happen with every abusive sockpuppet account you create. --Yamla (talk) 04:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet of User:Iamandrewrice, I am telling the truth, I'm not a vandal check My contribs, I'm a truthful editor, I use AOL. Yamla AOL's IP chnages each time you log in! --Jay Talk's 11:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The checkuser evidence is not described as ambiguous, but confirmed. – Luna Santin (talk) 11:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The checkuser evedence is wrong. I am not a vandal, I have never ever vandalised in my life, can you give me a chance, check what edits I make, then reblock me if nessercery. Get Tbo 157 (talk · contribs) he knows im not a vandal (he knows me as my old user jaytur1), or Epsilon60198 (talk · contribs), or bahamut0013 (talk · contribs). I am a useful editor. I don't know Iamandrewrice.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but there's sufficient evidence to show that you're Jay Turner, so this account will remain blocked as it is in violation of Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've asked the blocking admin to comment. - auburnpilot talk 14:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The case link given by Coredesat above doesn't have any information about this user account on it. I think he gave it as a record of Jay Turner's block and the associated accounts. Helics was in a checkuser case (Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Iamandrewrice 5) that was declined, however Yamla presented sufficient evidence to show that this account is indeed a block evading one. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 14:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I figured it was something obvious that I was just overlooking. - auburnpilot talk 14:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Helics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I'm User:Jay Turner but I was blocked for no reason

Decline reason:

Per above. Having created this account to evade your block there is inappropriate. Mango juice^talk 19:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.