User talk:Hughespj

AIV Reporting

Hi, I wanted to give you a couple of suggestions about editing Wikipedia, related to your recent AIV report. First, please add new comments to the bottom of a talk page. Don't worry, the user will still see what you have to say. Second, please follow the standard reporting procedure on WP:AIV, which is to use the {{IPVandal}} and {{Vandal}} template. These help the bots removing the templates from the page. Let me know if you have further questions. alphachimp 00:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work

Nice work on Chickasaw Wars and Chickasaw Campaign of 1736! I've been slowly poking at making a page on the Yamasee War, which currently is only briefly mentioned on the Yamasee page. These two Chickasaw pages are inspiring! Pfly 08:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow thanks a lot, I look forward to seeing your work on the Yamasees! Hughespj 10:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Valley

Hey, I appreciate your work on the Vaucluse article, is it at all possible you can get more information or pictures on other articles in the Midland Valley area? I have created articles for Warrenville, and Langley. I have also edited some information with regards to Graniteville. I understand that information for those places are very hard to find, that's why I'm kind of hoping they incorporate. Anyways, any information would be most useful, thanks. Iamanadam 13:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, there is so much to do and so little time, but hopefully some day something can be done. Hughespj 05:17, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:HorseCreekValley-SC Boles 1871.png missing description details

I have put forth a good faith effort to include relevant excerpts of images that are clearly allowable. But I have had it with Wikipedia bots deleting images obviously well over 100 years old, or clearly marked as works of the US government, and clearly described as such. Hopefully somebody someday will bother to look at something for more than eight microseconds before deleting another's conscientious work, or can take the time to tell me specifically what to do to fix the problem. Don't give me this 'easily avoidable' bull either - I have scoured the recommended practices for hours without being able to figure out what these bots are looking for. After a few more years of this, Wikipedia will be tweetable - good luck with that! Hughespj (talk) 15:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Graniteville Ducks

feel like doing a write up or page for us?

Graniteville Ducks https://www.facebook.com/groups/GranitevilleDucks1/

Wingman1 18:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Those are very cool, it might be best to do an article about the Graniteville Canal, with a paragraph about the ducks, all linked to the existing Graniteville, SC page. I don't think I can help though because I have a heck of a time submitting images nowadays. Some a$$bot always wants to delete them because I didn't check some invisible box somewhere - including photos I took myself and plainly said so in the description. Any ideas? Hughespj (talk) 02:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SouthCarolinaRR Med.jpg

The file File:SouthCarolinaRR Med.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant file - Lower quality version of c:File:SouthCarolinaRR Lg.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajpolino (talk) 01:34, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just wanted to explain the note above - I'm transferring public domain files you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons so that other Wikis can also use them! In the process I'm proposing for deletion the one above (since other Wikis could just use the larger/higher quality one you uploaded). Thanks for uploading these useful files! Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 01:36, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Me again, any chance you remember where you got this image? Thanks! Ajpolino (talk) 02:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:UpperSavannahRiverGA1817.jpg

The file File:UpperSavannahRiverGA1817.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No encyclopedic purpose - This is a screencap of this item from the library of congress. The full item is already uploaded to Commons here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajpolino (talk) 02:53, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:CodeDuelloApology.gif

The file File:CodeDuelloApology.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant orphaned image. Cropped version of c:File:CodeDuelloApologyLarge.gif at Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajpolino (talk) 03:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hughespj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]