User talk:Ibarrutidarruti

Welcome!

Hello, Ibarrutidarruti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hallo, you've reverted the same edit the third time within 24 hours on Template:Marxist theory. Please be aware that according to WP:3RR we are not entitled to reinsert the same edit more than 3 times a day. Greetings. --Schwalker (talk) 19:33, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Madeleine Albright

Thanks for adding the youtube link. I moved it up to the section where her interview was already discussed. There is also a section on this topic on the discussion page. You might want to take a look at these before contributing there again, so you don't bother to repeat work that's already been done. Best,DougHill (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Marxist theory. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. RolandR 22:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of contributors to Marxist theory. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. RolandR 22:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at List of contributors to Marxist theory

Hello Ibarrutidarruti. A user has filed a complaint about your edits at the 3RR noticeboard. I notice that you've repeatedly added mention of Kim Il-Sung to a variety of articles, but I do not see you getting consensus for your changes anywhere. You have several times reverted other editors when they removed your change. This looks to me like edit warring.

If you are willing to voluntarily agree to follow the steps of WP:Dispute resolution you may be able to avoid a block. If you accept, I'll present some alternatives and you can decide how to proceed. In any event, you must not continue to revert these articles. EdJohnston (talk) 15:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the new material which has been added to the above-mentioned 3RR case which is a complaint about your editing. Per the decision in this case, if you resume addition of Kim Il-Sung's name as a Marxist theorist to any Wikipedia articles, without first getting consensus of other editors to do so, you may be blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 21:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fight Back! News

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fight Back! News requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 03:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liberation Road for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liberation Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberation Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

// Timothy :: talk 17:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gavin Newsom, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:The void century

I think you know very well why I removed that comment. If you like, I can post a templated warning, but I don't think that's necessary. Drmies (talk) 02:48, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing you didn't warn the user for his incredibly patronizing and inappropriate comment? Ibarrutidarruti (talk) 02:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ibarrutidarruti your edit to Scientific consensus was non-constructive. Scientific consensus is not an an appeal to authority, even if it can be used that way in speech. This line is also UNDUE in the lead: In popular discourse it is used as a rhetorical method of persuasion. The second paragraph of the lede explains why pretty well. Arguably, the "Politicization of science" section is taking up too much real estate-- so if you want to improve the article, I would start by paring that section down and adding more discussion of encyclopedic aspects like history, philosophy, what it currently means, etc. The revert and warning template were nothing personal. Just what Twinkle does automatically. The void century 16:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the THIRD time I've asked you to not interact with my talk page. It is unwanted and astoundingly hypocritical. Stop harassing me. Ibarrutidarruti (talk) 19:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The void century 18:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]