BICRO

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of BICRO, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.cro-ict.net/supported_by. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:12, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ivan. I can restore it, but it will need a lot of cleanup. As it stands, it is highly promotional in nature and unsuitable for inclusion because of that. What I'll do is to restore it to a user subpage:

User:Ivan Pakšec/BICRO

This will allow you to remove the promotional content and bring it more in line with the site's neutrality policy. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS: In order to release the content in the proper manner, please review this section. Thanks for asking and thanks for being nice. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, --PMDrive1061,

I have made a some changes in a txt for BICRO. Changed txt is now on my user subpage. BICRO is non profitable organisation, who is not publishing this article for a advertising but for informing. Plese, can You now publish this article, I truly hope that txt is now in a line with sites neutrality policy. tnx Ivan Pakšec (talk) 10:47, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ivan. It's better, but some samples are still coming up as direct copies and the overall tone is still too promotional. I'll go ahead and do some work on it myself. Thanks again for your contribution! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've begun work on the article and I can finish it up soon. It's a very worthy project and absolutely deserves an article. If you're involved with the project, I can't tell you how supportive I am of your efforts. PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. I'll work on it a bit more and we'll get it ready to put back into the main article space. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And we're ready to go! Open up the page, go into edit mode, copy the text, open the blank article at BICRO and paste the text there. That will give you credit for the creation of the article. Nice working with you on this! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:53, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Say, that's a darn good-looking article. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BICRO

A tag has been placed on BICRO, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 15:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strange...

Looks like there may have been a misunderstanding here. I'll talk to the admin who deleted it. Don't worry; it can be restored. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:21, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BICRO

Hi Amalthea,

I had published the BICRO artice, wich PMDrive1061 has changed and prepaired for publishing. After that, anyhow the artice had been deleted as they say "because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising". Pleas can You help me with publishing that. I realy don't know what to do next, after PMDrive1061 change it...

tnx Ivan Pakšec (talk) 15:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked the admin who deleted it for input. I'm sure we can get it up again, in some form. Could you, in the meantime, try and look for some reliable sources that can verify the content in the article? Or, where did you get all the information from? Those sources don't have to be in English, but they if possible they should be independent of the topic, say in a newspaper. After I quick search, I only found this press release. Amalthea 12:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amalthea,

this is the copy of verification mail from BICRO Ltd. wich aloud us to use the content from BICRO's official site and simmilar things. The article was written by Ivica Bučić (Assistant & WEB administrator at BICRO Ltd) and adapted for wikipedia by PMDrive1061.

I truly hope that this verification mail will be a valid information that will aloud us to publish the article.

Tnx very much,

Ivan

From: Ivica Bušić [1] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 3:02 PM To: 'Kristijan Paksec' Subject: Odgovor za Wikipediju

Dear mr. Pakšec,

according to your e-mail on March 9 2010th and request for approval of use of material contained in the email below, we inform you that you are allowed to use the same profile on Wikipedia, as well as content from the site www.bicro.hr.

Ivica Bušić Assistant & WEB administrator Planinska 1, 10000 Zagreb phone: +385 1 2352 601 fax: +385 1 2352 615 www.bicro.hr

Ivan Pakšec (talk) 11:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. OK, a number of things:

The above confirmation wouldn't actually be enough. For the exact steps required to use copyrighted material, see WP:IOWN.
Material from an organization's "About us" page is almost never useful in an article about that organization, since it's normally not following our core policies, WP:Neutral point of view and WP:Verifiability.
The first step to create an article is to show the importance of the topic, per WP:Notability (companies and corporations). That's why I asked whether you have reliable sources, independent of the topic, that are covering the topic in detail. Like newspaper articles, for example. I hadn't looked for too long, but only found a press release.
Please also have a look at WP:FAQ/Organizations.

Kind regards, Amalthea 11:20, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]