User talk:John Prattley

Welcome!

Hello, John Prattley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Hi, John

Sorry about the quick deletion. You'll probably understand when I say that we get a lot of spam, and deletion is one of the chores that have to be done and there isn't a lot of spare time to do it in.

I've restored your article and hope you can improve the tone of it to make it more encyclopaedic. See some of the guidance pages listed above and they will lead you to others. Deb (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hi John Prattley,

Thanks for helping with Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. Here's an invitation to visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan. There, you can meet other Wikipedians working on articles related to Japan. You'll find lists of new articles, projects, and links to resources such as

Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles), with decisions the community has made about how to format articles
Template:Newest Japan-related articles, where you can list the articles you create so the community can see them
Portal:Japan, a collection of resources on Japan

You'll also learn about {{WikiProject Japan}}, a template you can place on the talk page of any relevant article, and find instructions for assessing articles.

Hope to see you there!

Best regards, Fg2 (talk) 11:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Max Factor Article

Just a thank you for the brilliant edit. A fascinating read!

--99.231.199.18 (talk) 23:59, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

=WP:OMT invitation

I know you've got these pouring out of your ears, but do you want to join WP:OMT? It's an attempt to make every single articles about battleships and battlecruisers featured. I wwouldn't usually just be going about, invinting people, but your work on Mutsu and Nagato class battleship suprised me. I think you'd do well there editing Japanese realted articles (There's a good deal of them without really good explanations). So think about it. The doors are always open!

(P.S. When writing Cosntruction sections, try to utilize everything under hte "General Characteristics" section in the infobox, the large box to the right of the text)

Buggie111 (talk) 13:13, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join MILHIST

Hello John Prattley! Thank you for your contributions.

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, please take a look at the Military history WikiProject—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please sign your name here, and a project coordinator will soon be along with a formal welcome. Regards, Anotherclown (talk) 22:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Gallaher

Hey. Good to see that expansion of Dave Gallaher that you performed. I've been meaning to expand the article myself. If you've got access to any good references for material on him, it would be great if further inline citations could be added. Anyway main point of this message was to say good work. - Shudde ^talk 08:27, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shinjuku Gyoen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The shogun bequeathed this land to Lord Naitō [[daimyo]]) of Tsuruga in the Edo period who completed a garden here in 1772.<ref>Mansfield. Page 15.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Steven M. Zeitels may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Zeitels grew up in [[New Rochelle, New York]]). His father, an orthodontist, pushed him to take up a career in medicine and enrolled him at the
discussed extensively in print media, radio, and television both nationally and internationally [i.e. [[Good Morning America]], [[The Today Show]], [[ABC World News]], [[Wall Street Journal]], [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:29, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teatro di San Carlo

Thanks for your additions to the article. That book looks like it could be quite worthwhile.

As a longtime (9 years) member of WP:Opera, I'd just like to draw your attention to several editing conventions employed in this and in (almost) all other articles which fall under the WikiProject Opera group, which via a consensus of editors over the years, have become established and agreed upon.

For instance, we use the "Notes" (footnotes) and "Sources" (even dividing between "Cited sources" and "Other sources") under the main "References" heading. If you wish to take a look at the Project page, you can find it here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera/Article styles and formats. All the best, Viva-Verdi (talk) 17:58, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nellie Melba

Hello! I noticed that you added a few interesting facts to the Nellie Melba article. Unfortunately, you did not cite your sources, so I have removed the information for now. If you can point to the source(s) (including page numbers or URLs) where you got the information, feel free to re-add it, together with citations to the source(s). See WP:V for more information. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good. The references make all the difference. This encyclopedia depends, for its value to researchers, on the references, as discussed at WP:V. Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Gallaher again

Hey John. I've been slowly going through the Dave Gallaher article, giving it a bit of a clean and a copy-edit, and also trying to get it referenced appropriately. In the Memorials section I've not had any success finding a reliable source for the inscription that is on the statue of Gallaher outside Eden Park. I'm pretty sure you added this text to the article, do you have, or know of, a source for this text? Thanks. -- Shudde ^talk 02:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for adding the beautiful Great Houses of London to all those articles! The book has provided a great resource for me in my Wikipedia work, and evidently a great pleasure to you, too. Any work you do on the great London houses is much appreciated. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 00:13, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gallaher again

Hey John. Just letting you know that I've requested a peer review for the Dave Gallaher article; the review can be found here. Thought you may want to contribute, basically looking for any feedback at all (no matter how pedantic) on the article. Aiming to have it featured on the main page one day. No problems if you don't have the time, but thought I'd let you know after all the work you did on the biography. -- Shudde ^talk 06:55, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Battleship Builders

It's great that you've been adding this book to the articles, but please understand that you should add it in a separate Further reading section since the book actually isn't being used as a source for any of the articles. Also there's no need to specify the format, so replace it with "|lastauthoramp=y" to match the format of the citations that use an ampersand for multiple authors.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reusing sources

Hello. When using multiple references of the same source, please use the Refname format. Thank you. — Wylie pedia 21:07, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Villa Carlotta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellagio. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, John Prattley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (James Robert Dennistoun) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating James Robert Dennistoun, John Prattley!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please be careful about avoiding close paraphrasing. I have rewritten the first paragraph of World War I. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:50, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, John Prattley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inca Písac (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Písac instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft appears to be more detailed than the article. Please edit and expand the article to incorporate additional information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inca Písac and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Inca Písac, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, John Prattley! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Survey on proposed 2021 Wikimedia Aotearoa conference

Kia ora, as an editor in New Zealand I wanted to let you know about a survey gathering information for planning a Wikimedia conference in early 2021. Here's the link - it's open til 18 November. Feel free to share it with other editors you know too. Cheers! https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/K37CY2B MurielMary (talk) 10:50, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Otago Witness

Good work on the Otago Witness! If you were interested to give it a longer lead section and attend to the citation needed tags, its assessment could easily be upgraded to B class. Schwede 66 04:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Inca Písac

Hello, John Prattley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inca Písac".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:11, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marianne Ihlen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Cohen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Post-war reconstruction of Frankfurt, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Post-war reconstruction of Frankfurt, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Inca Písac

Hello, John Prattley. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inca Písac".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Liz,

Thanks for deleting this draft.

A editor had prevented it from being published and wouldn't reply to my efforts to discuss it. As result I couldn't make any progress. After being upset by his attitude for 6 months I returned to the article and was able to get around him and it has been published with the title "Inca complex at Písac". It has been subsequently recognized as a B-class by Wikiproject Peru. John Prattley (talk) 04:17, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ruahei Demant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warkworth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tyla King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Carter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:14, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]