Ok, the reason why I insist that my version be kept, is because it achieves neutral POV. Deliberately I used 3 pro-CHXHCN photos, 3 pro-VNCH photos to make it fair and balanced for the 2 sides. I also deliberately alternated the ordering of the photos so 1 communist photo is followed by 1 anti-communist photo, again to achieve NPOV. Same thing with the name ordering and name bolding in the info box, 2 communist names bolded and 2 anti-communist names bolded. And, the anti-communist name, Black April (Thang Tu Den) is placed right after the communist name Ngay Thong Nhat. Please be neutral in your edits and be able to accept compromise edits, edits that are fair for all sides, you get some of the things you demand and others also get some of the things they want. You cannot always have your way 100%. Also, please understand my side of this. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 06:44, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I periodically check controversial articles manually, to see if any unacceptable changes have been made. Funny how you claim i followed you whenyou yourself admitted to trolling me.
Part of reaching WP:NPOV neutralitydoes include "balance in everything", including balance in article structure and how everything is organized. So, me organizing the name ordering and photo ordering achieves neutrality in article organization and making it fair for all sides, and yes that is important. I have made it fair everywhere in the article and i see no other better way than this. This is not about "good and evil", this is about neutrality, fairness and balance for both sides. Look, it is not right for us to be fighting each other, you're not accepting fairness and it is unprofessional for both of us to be disputing over this. And, we're both Vietnamese and it is not right for us to continue fighting each other, especially over things like this. We both had people in our own families die in this war 39 years ago, and sensitive controversial things like this one can only be dealt with in an unbiased, fair and thorough way to make allsides happy, and I vow that I will never let this go until a balanced compromise is found. Just accept this balanced version and this problem is over. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 00:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. No, Viet Kieu never wanted to separate VN. Never, I just want to make that clear - we are one people, one country, yes there's cultural differences between the 3 regions, but we are one and always will be. All we Viet Kieu want is for the imperialist northern aggressor (lũ Tàu) to back off, leave our homeland alone, stop attacking our people and stealing everything from us, and the gov't to...you know in the very last photo. That's it. We are just as nationalist and patriotic to VN as any other Vietnamese. Because we still love and care about VN, that's why we continue to advocate the best for our homeland. This is part of the reason why you see me edit in the English Q.Đ.H.S. and Q.Đ.T.S. articles, because lũ Tàu push their POV on there. Nguyễn Quốc Việt (talk) 05:33, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
