User talk:LeapTorchGear

Welcome!

Hello, LeapTorchGear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Center for International Private Enterprise, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 20:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: No, I don't have a conflict of interest regarding that article. It just looked interesting. Please let me know if you think there is anything wrong with the article. LeapTorchGear (talk) 16:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, there's all kinds of things wrong with the article, as the tags clearly indicate. I'm wondering how you came across it, why you thought it would be a good idea to submit it, why you didn't think anything of the tags, and whether you have any relation to User:Alex shifrin. User:MrsSnoozyTurtle, this concerns a draft that you twice (and correctly) moved back into draft space. Drmies (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Drmies. Thank you for the ping. I am no longer involved in WikiProject Spam, but I appreciate you making the effort nonetheless. All the best, MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center for International Private Enterprise (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Center for International Private Enterprise and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LeapTorchGear! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:30, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jeverland

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jeverland, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Declining articles

Hi LeapTorchGear,

Please refrain from adding declined AFC template to articles as only AFC reviewers can decline or approve articles. Jamiebuba (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your logic

I wonder what brings here to ask me about the Draft:Yang Maosou with the comment "If you are not comfortable dealing with Chinese-language references, even using Google translate, you should probably not evaluate drafts dealing with China." with this diif. Do you unde4rstand that you have added all offline citations without identifiers? No page numbers, no accessible method(supporting one) and you want it to be accepted?

You claimed you didn't create the article. Then what your concern? What is your relation with @Zangxuangao as you both have similar citation styles?? Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Twinkle1990:. You should read Wikipedia:Offline sources, which says:

Wikipedia's reliable sources guideline states that articles should be sourced with reliable, third-party, published sources. Even though Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, there is no distinction between using online versus offline sources. While many editors use online sources, such as websites and online journals, many great sources are only available offline in printed books and paper journals. Don't let the fact that a printed book or journal is not available online scare you away from using them as a source in Wikipedia. Likewise, do not remove cited material merely because it is from an offline source.

In summary, offline sources are fine, and my comments are consistent with Wikipedia policy. You may want to ask for help at Wikipedia:Teahouse if this is unclear, but until you do, you should probably not evaluate drafts. LeapTorchGear (talk) 21:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Twinkle1990:. Never mind. The article already exists in articlespace at Yang Maosou, with a creation date of October 2023. And Zangxuangao (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) really isn't me. LeapTorchGear (talk) 21:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wasatch County School District (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wasatch County School District and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk • contribs 18:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editing someone else's user space

Please do not active InternetArchiveBot or Citation bot on someone else's user pages without asking in advance. Please see WP:USERTALKSTOP. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 12:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hattori Tenjin Shrine (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notable subject, but you have to understand enwiki and jawiki has differences in policies and here on enwiki we simply cannot accept purely unsourced paragraphs (See "Fuku Musume"). Seems like the entire draft is rammed through a translation machine from jawiki, which can be noticed by the clear weirdness in wikilinks (as pointed by from below comment, some red wikilinks should have linked to the proper English article.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hattori Tenjin Shrine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TL;DR: Please check the accuracy of the machine translation when using them. Repeatedly submitting machine translated drafts without checking them can be considered disruptive. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Land agents has been nominated for deletion

Category:Land agents has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 01:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christian Amalvi has been accepted

Christian Amalvi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 01:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]