The current time is 12:27, November 2, 2024 (UTC).

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Archives

vn-5

This user talk page has been vandalized 5 times.

Please Post Under Here

Jonathan Taylor Thomas vandalism

Hi LetyeWolfer, I watch over Jonathan Taylor Thomas's page and have noticed Gymnast4life3233 (talk) has vandalized it for the second time despite a warning. Could you please send a warning to him/her? Thanks! IndulgentReader (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "repeat vandals"

No IP address will be blocked on sight simply because they have been blocked previously. Any admin who would perform such a block needs to reread our blocking policy. IP addresses change, and there are few occasions where it is obviously the same vandal. Please do not encourage people to report vandals to WP:AIV without proper warnings. It wastes time for both editors and admins. - auburnpilot talk 00:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop adding your templates to IP talk pages. Your assertions are not true. - auburnpilot talk 18:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AuburnPilot is correct. The header message you placed on User talk:71.98.153.145 and other IP talk pages is simply not accurate. Instead, please use {{ISP}} or {{SharedIP}}. Those are approved templates in which the instructions accurately reflect current policy. Thanks. — Satori Son 18:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Green Edits

My sincere apologies, but I was deleting items that were placed there for pure partisan and political spite. Come on, explain to me why a "Nun Protest" is even there unless someone's got an axe to grind against the Ambassador. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.26.77 (talk) 00:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First off, what would really have helped you was an account name. I look for vandalism based on anonymous IP addresses. Having an account gives you a lot of validity with many editors/counter-candalism patrollers. Second, citing why you were deleting. Removing information -without stating why- merely leads another editor to believe that you want something hidden.

As for why nuns are relevant: that's a good question. I really don't know why. So, for that reason, ask the same question on the article's discussion page. Also, state why you think its not relevant (after reviewing the reference material provided in a link in this case) and allow a day or two (at least) to pass. Someone may respond and a dialogue will open as to how and improve the article. If no one does, then it can be well argued that consensus agrees with you. Yes, its not instantaneous and if you have an opposing political view, the gratification can be delayed. But, in the end, its the process that makes the article better, and that's why we're all here. Thanks for asking the question! --LeyteWolfer (talk) 01:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have since created a log-in account. Once again, my apologies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viper3579 (talk • contribs) 01:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Valentine's Day!

A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Way cool. Thanks; I wasn't expecting that and it ''is'' appreciated! --LeyteWolfer (talk) 22:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Annoyance at another member

Okay I am a bit miffed at member NuSchu. It was at the British Airways article and I added the incident back in Jan 29 2007 where in LAX, they found a dead body at the wheel well. This member comes along and just deletes it saying it's a commmon thing, regardless it was still a major incident in LAX. (I should know I was there), I wanted to contact this member but I can see he is very unpopular so I didn't want to make a scene. I'm not sure if you're an admin or not or if you got any power but your name popped out from his member discussion page. I want to make a complaint about this but I'm not sure how to proceed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vegas07 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I must say you've hurt my feelings greatly by calling me "unpopular". I'm also not sure why you asked me to reply on a different user's talk page...but the reason I removed it is quite justified. I understood it was a good-faith edit, but I didn't think it passed our guidelines for notability. The BA 777 was notable because the aircraft had to be written off. These wheel-well deaths, while sad, are not uncommon in aviation. I don't see how this would have been significant to the article. Perhaps it has more significance in the LAX article, but not in the BA one. NcSchu_(Talk) 21:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

expelled, pz, et al

I removed your edit because the mall screening is already in the article, see the second para here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed#Screenings feel free to add to it. Angry Christian (talk) 23:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you're right. I'll add to that one. Thanks. --LeyteWolfer (talk) 23:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miley Cyrus photos

I undid your addition for reasons talked about in talk:Miley Cyrus. We are not in any hurry to have current events info in the article and want to make sure we do it right, specifically for derogatory info in bio articles. I would appreciate it if you could comment on the issue in the discussion page and help us work to a consensus of how we can handle this issue. --NrDg 15:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like we cross-posted. I'll meet you at your's. --LeyteWolfer (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss on article discussion page - discussion in progress. Private discussions are not persuasive to others. --NrDg 15:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please revisit Clifton Emmet "Cliff" Cushman

Could you please take another look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifton Emmet "Cliff" Cushman? It turns out that there was another article for the same athlete at Clifton Cushman. --Eastmain (talk) 03:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I sure will. Thanks for letting me know. --LeyteWolfer (talk) 04:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization barnstar

You should try checking out my work lol!!! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 20:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Aleena's RfA

LeyteWolfer...Thank you for supporting my nomination for adminship. Through it I have become aware of a great many people who can help me in my future editing endeavors. Even though I was not promoted, your support shows that I still have something to contribute to Wikipedia, even if it is minor edits to fix spelling and grammar to working in WikiProjects to help others make great articles. If you wish to further discuss the nomination, please use its talk page. Stop by my talk page anytime, even if it is just to say hello. Have a wonderful day! - LA @ 04:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barakeh (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Draft Guidelines for Lists of companies by country - Review Request

Hi, I saw your comment on the List of companies of Iran talk page from a while ago. If you are still interested in policy creation, I've put together a draft set of guidelines for all Lists of companies by country, to hopefully ensure a minimum quality standard and consistency across all. I'd appreciate any feedback you may have as I look to to move this guideline forward. Many thanks! - Richc80 (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guestbook

Came across your guestbook (signed). If you would like more signatures, you can add your page to the category wikipedian autograph pages. Cheers.--LAA Fan^sign _review 22:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Benny Hinn Page

I was wondering if there could be a link to a website which teachings contrary to Benny Hinn's teaching? if so the following would be useful.

Discernment Ministry on teachings of Benny Hinn Ministries —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.71.196.171 (talk) 03:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Are you a VHS student? -Raziel (talk) 14:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Potez-7.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Potez-7.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Che

Hello LeyteWolfer, nice to meet you. My reason for contacting you was because I believe that as a result of my revert of your addition; you may be assuming that we are actually at more of a disagreement on the issue than we really are. For instance you labeled the matter an "active disagreement" and then made an rfc before I could even address your edit on the talk page (which I plan to do shortly). My issue with your addition was based more on the sourcing and wording, than the factual accuracy of the inherent claim you were including. I look forward to discussing the matter more with you on the appropriate articles talk page, but felt it potentially beneficial to first speak with you here - in the hopes of de-escalating the issue. Thanks. Redthoreau (talk)RT 22:14, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, and thank you for reaching out. Yeah, that 'active disagreements' was clearly a mistake. I really meant to go with RFC, and so retracted my bid for a "Third Opinion" (which I mistook for another form of RFC) when I realized my mistake. I look forward to working with you. --LeyteWolfer (talk) 22:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USAA

Thank you for your remarks on USAA. They are most appreciated! Student7 (talk) 16:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Realism versus isolated idealism. LeyteWolfer (talk) 23:35, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice posted to User talk:2600:3C00:0:0:F03C:91FF:FE96:2030

Regarding the notice you posted to User talk:2600:3C00:0:0:F03C:91FF:FE96:2030, I don't see why I was given it. I simply reverted some vandalism on the Teach: Tony Danza page. 2600:3C00:0:0:F03C:91FF:FE96:2030 (talk) 09:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aereo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kansas City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Panel Discussions

The article Panel Discussions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 07:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 07:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Colonial Properties

The article Colonial Properties has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable REIT, very run of the mill. Unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, LeyteWolfer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, LeyteWolfer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LeyteWolfer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited White Darkness (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]