User talk:Lowfive22

August 2018

Hello, I'm 71.215.24.44. I noticed that you recently removed content from The New School without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 71.215.24.44 (talk) 17:39, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The New School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 71.215.24.44 (talk) 17:45, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The New School, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 17:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Luk ^talk 18:28, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]