User talk:Lvhis
|
|
|
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peng Shige, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICIAM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Lvhis, The reference you added is in Chinese. Would you be able to find a source for Ma Haide's children names in an English reference? A few of my updates in people articles have been deleted by vandals due to reference. Thanks, SWP13 (talk) 06:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hi SWP13, I just found one here: http://www.bjreview.com/World/201509/t20150916_800038489.html. One family photo was noted "George Hatem's widow Zhou Sufei (center, front row), their son Zhou Youma (left, front row) and family members (COURTESY OF ZHOU YOUMA)", and actually all photos there were "COURTESY OF ZHOU YOUMA". In addition, "A Profile of Zhou Youma" there gave more detail about Zhou Youma. If you like, you can add this RS into article Ma Haide. --Lvhis (talk) 19:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Disappearance of yingying zhang
[edit]I have listed Disappearance of yingying zhang at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Contested_technical_requests for community discussion. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Peng Shilu
[edit]
On 31 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Peng Shilu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peng Shilu, the "father of China's nuclear submarines", was jailed at age eight? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Peng Shilu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Peng Shilu), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FIVB World Rankings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIVB World Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Corrected. Thanks for reminding.--Lvhis (talk) 03:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Consult
[edit]Hello, Lvhis. Thanks for your correct. I am not sure whether family names are different from training names. Can you help me distinguish them (if you have time). Happy editing to you!--波斯波莉斯 (talk) 02:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, the family name means the surname, i.e. "姓" in Chinese; while what you wanted to add in that article is Peng Pai's "学名" Peng Hanyu, where "学名" in English should be expressed as training name. In Chinese, "学名" is also called "训名".--Lvhis (talk) 20:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your mention. I forget family name only means "姓" in Chinese. And I translated it from Chinese directly. By the way, I find many extra contents in zh:彭湃. So I also want to transfer something from zh-wikipedia (彭湃and反彭湃事件 Anti-Peng Pai Incident) to en-wikipedia (Peng Pai). How do you think of this? Happy editing to you!--波斯波莉斯 (talk) 03:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think that is really necessary. Or you'd be better to edit in your personal Sandbox first if you want to try but to avoid ruining the article(s). Lvhis (talk) 19:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Peng Pai
[edit]Why did you revert my content? Your behavior is not essential. And "Seeds of Peasant Revolution: Report on the Haifeng Peasant Movement" is a name of Peng's work. You can search on google. If you continue to revert my contribution without anything necessarily, I will regard it as vandalism.
By the way, I also looked through your talk page in zh-wiki. I found that you seem like a bad-credit user. (Someone even asked you to stop your vandalism in zh-wikipedia. I wouldn't want to mention his name. But in my opinion and impression, he has more credit than you).
Nevertheless, you can feel free to leave messages in my zh-wikipedia.--波斯波莉斯 (talk) 01:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Checked some wiki articles about writers such as Lu Xun where "Bibliography" can be in articles. Peng Pai was not a writer but a revolutionary. Whether a section Bibliography is necessary in the article is not a clear-cut decision. Just keep it as you like it, and sorry for previous revert. While Peng Pai's famous work in English is "Report on the Haifeng Peasant Movement" translated by Donald Holoch and published by Cornell University which has been cited as a reliable source in the article Peng Pai (see the reference 7 there[1]). Your accusation about my edits in zh-wiki is totally based on your misunderstanding and is nearly of a personal attack. We are talking about edit in this en-wiki so just talk here. Lvhis (talk) 22:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- "Peng was not a writer but a revolutionary (I prefer to use leader, communist)" you are right, but he also wrote some works. Listing them is better than not.
- You said my behavior is nearly if a personal attack, so what about yours? You reverted my edits just with your mind once and again. How do you think about it? I am not only talking edit in en-wiki but also your edits in zh-wiki (You also have contributed as many as contents in there). Pardon me, please. I think you can't keep neutral in those articles. I will also mention that in zh-wiki, too.--波斯波莉斯 (talk) 04:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
References
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Thought this may be of interest
[edit]Hi, I see you been editing Sun Yang page for some time and have years of experience. I thought you might want to know that I discovered an editor adding paywalled sources that doesn't support their edits. Most people wouldn't catch this, but I was skeptical and subscribed to the paper. After reading the paywalled article, I found that it didn't back up most of their changes. I didn't respond right away because I was unsure how to proceed. I did, however, take snapshots of the entire articles and can privately email them to Wikipedia project upon request to prove the unsourced edits. [1] He wrote, No action was ever taken against The Sunday Times, which revealed the details of a FINA investigations report in which Sun Yang and his entourage were heavily criticised. The report noted that Sun Yang, urged on by his entourage, has removed a blood sample from the chain of command after having signed it over for analysis. Except the source doesn't say any of that. One source is from 3 Feb 2019, only a few days after the original story first broke and never been updated, and it doesn't even make any mention of a lawsuit against that article itself. And they used another source to claim Sun "signed" sample over for analysis. Maybe that's correct or false. However none of that is supported by the source also.[2] Maybe they assumed that nobody would subscribe and read that article. Well I actually did subscribe to that paper as it only costs 1 pound for a 6 months trial and I was curious. Here is proof of that where I took enough snapshots of the entire article.[3] And also took a snapshot of an email from the newspaper to prove I subscribed and then cancelled my trial.[4] I read the article many times and I can tell that none of that information is sourced and they should know.
I raised the issue with a mentor and they've been helpful. Apparently you can take it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange if necessary and they should have access to paywalled articles and resolve. I don't think that's quite necessary yet, as I doubt other guy would challenge. I already resolved it myself[5] but thought this may be of interest and that you may want to watch that guy if they ever try this again, and you will know what to do. Jakeswimfan888 (talk) 14:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, if you find any content in an article is unsourced or false sourced and you are confident with sources in you hand, simply go straight to delete that/those content(s) or modify it/them, and leave your brief description of your reason for the changes in "Edit summary". You have done it, good. Lvhis (talk) 21:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
