User talk:MarkWarren
|
Thompson Constant Velocity Joint
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palm (PDA), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tandy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your additions to this article. I just have a query about your sourcing using mbed source which includes commentary like "The picture here is not the final micro:bit" - how can we be sure any or all of this technical info is up to date or reliable? --ℕ ℱ 20:44, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
I don't see that commentary on the linked page.Further, the mbed blog article cited was written after the public unveiling of the micro:bit and the author had specific knowledge regarding the production chip selections. The other two sources (the BBC video and the wired.co.uk article) published images of the final board and both show the SoC/processor chip in enough detail to read the chip markings to confirm that the micro:bit devices shown to the media do in fact use the nRF51822 SoC. mbed is the primary designer for this board and therefore has special standing regarding the details of its design.
- Thanks for your response. The commentary is at the end of the first paragraph. There wasn't a date on the article which is why I queried. I'm just keen to ensure we keep the article robustly sourced with independent secondary sources, rather than getting a bit too caught up in primary source detailed stuff if you see what I mean. --ℕ ℱ 21:42, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- I agree that secondary sources are important and my contributions speak for themselves. When discussing pre-release hardware like the BBC micro:bit, however, secondary sources for the pinouts and technical details just don't yet exist. Even after micro:bits have been released to secondary sources for testing, the manufacturer's documentation is still typically the more reliable source of technical specifications.
- I read the commentary that "The picture here is not the final micro:bit!" as applying to the picture itself and not the other information on the page. The fact that the author was careful enough to point that out implies a good deal of attention to detail.
- that's sort of my point. If secondary sources don't exist, then that's quite a good argument for why maybe a less detailed article is appropriate at that stage. --ℕ ℱ 22:43, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- I added some text to indicate that the specs aren't quite final using Template:As_of in hopes that someone will notice and recheck on the off chance that something gets altered during final manufacturing.
- that's sort of my point. If secondary sources don't exist, then that's quite a good argument for why maybe a less detailed article is appropriate at that stage. --ℕ ℱ 22:43, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Micro:bit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PWM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
HELLLO
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
|
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, MarkWarren. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, MarkWarren. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, MarkWarren. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
