User talk:MobbinLynch1996

Welcome!

Hello, MobbinLynch1996, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Get Rich or Die Tryin', but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rob van vee 07:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I noticed that in this edit to Vic Vega, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sea Cow (talk) 04:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Experimental Theory: A Walk Into The Depths Of Lake City moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Experimental Theory: A Walk Into The Depths Of Lake City, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 08:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Experimental Theory: A Walk Into The Depths Of Lake City

Hello, MobbinLynch1996. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Experimental Theory: A Walk Into The Depths Of Lake City, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Experimental Theory: A Walk Into The Depths Of Lake City

Hello, MobbinLynch1996. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Experimental Theory: A Walk Into The Depths Of Lake City".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vic Vega (rapper)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vic Vega (rapper) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Exemplo347 (talk) 04:49, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vic Vega (rapper) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vic Vega (rapper) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vic Vega (rapper) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Exemplo347 (talk) 05:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I request to be unblocked as I didn't know about violations on multiple accs when editing a page for wiki. Won't happen again. MobbinLynch1996 (talk) 21:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Besides User:Kingdomblair82 and User:Scott348, what other accounts do you own on Wikipedia, regardless of whether they edited Vic Vega (rapper)?--Bbb23 (talk) 21:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

nothing else, it was just kingdom and scott MobbinLynch1996 (talk) 22:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

any update so far MobbinLynch1996 (talk) 06:28, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that you didn't know that multiple accounts are generally a violation of WP:SOCK, why did you create two new accounts, and why did you create them only to edit the Vega article? Also, what is your relationship with Vega?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't know what I was doin, felt like editing a wiki page heaps of times with one acc would be getting it blocked but its the other way around. For vic vega? I only just know his music and looked more into his biography from his websites, etc. MobbinLynch1996 (talk) 14:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First, the reason you give for creating multiple accounts is precisely what is prohibited by policy. Second, if you are not affiliated with Vega, why did you claim Vega's picture to be your "own work"?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oh, was my mistake putting it my own work before uploading that pic MobbinLynch1996 (talk) 14:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another violation of policy, WP:COPYVIO. Were you unaware of that policy, too?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:59, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes I was MobbinLynch1996 (talk) 20:36, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]