User talk:Mobyjaws56

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paul Kelly - Stories of Me.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ian Darling.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:36, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Paul Kelly - Stories of Me, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 01:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ian Darling concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ian Darling, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shark Island Productions concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shark Island Productions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Ian Darling

Hello Mobyjaws56. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Ian Darling.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ian Darling}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:In The Company of Actors movie poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:In The Company of Actors movie poster.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paul Kelly: Stories of Me may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*Won ATOM AWARD (2013 ''Best Documentary Arts'''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Kelly: Stories of Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shark Island Productions

Hello Mobyjaws56. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Shark Island Productions".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shark Island Productions}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:In The Company of Actors movie poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:In The Company of Actors movie poster.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ian Darling image.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ian Darling image.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:40, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mobyjaws56/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mobyjaws56, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:16, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments at Draft:Good Pitch

Hello, Mobyjaws56. You have new messages at Draft:Good Pitch.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Pitch (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at BRITDOC_Foundation#Good_Pitch instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Good Pitch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~KvnG 19:26, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ursula Mills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ursula Mills Sydney Theatre Company 2014 Season Launch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ursula Mills Sydney Theatre Company 2014 Season Launch.jpg, which you've attributed to Sydney Theatre Company. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 03:58, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ursula Mills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ian Darling hosts Good Pitch Australia.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ian Darling hosts Good Pitch Australia.jpg, which you've attributed to Ian Darling. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Suzy & The Simple Man official poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Suzy & The Simple Man official poster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 16:08, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Suzy & The Simple Man official poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Suzy & The Simple Man official poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mobyjaws56. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shark Island Productions official logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shark Island Productions official logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mobyjaws56. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Byron Kennedy Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Butler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Final Quarter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Kelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:49, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited In the Company of Actors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mobyjaws56. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Shark Island Productions, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Greyjoy^talk 06:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mobyjaws56. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Ian Darling, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Greyjoy^talk 06:40, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ian Darling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:IDD 2016 copyrightSII wiki.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IDD 2016 copyrightSII wiki.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mobyjaws56, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Greyjoy^talk 05:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mobyjaws56. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Query regarding other accounts

Hi, Mobyjaws56. My name is Tamzin, and I'm an administrator and sockpuppet investigations clerk here. I've asked a question at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mobyjaws56 regarding your interactions with a couple of other accounts. Please don't make any other edits until you've had a chance to respond there. Thanks. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 21:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tamzin, thanks for alerting me. I logged in today to see if there had been a response to the IP unblock request from colleague. Previously sparkles and Moby have identified ourselves as work colleagues and a COI disclosure made with Greyjoy for the Ian Darling page. Neither accounts are sock puppets or meat puppets of others.

There are other colleagues and non-associates in this building on the same wifi system, and it is for them the block lift is requested as currently our whole IPN is currently blocked.

We have not received any feedback from an administrator / admin person about our genuine request at the time of COI disclosure about how edits are made to BLP's in a way that wiki approves of - it does not make sense Sparkles and I are the only people on the planet making edit updates as work achievements and film publications take place, and realistically as Ian is not a celebrity randoms are unlikely to update it - but he is very well connected there are many who read his wiki page - we'd like it to be correct. Wiki is now a primary source for many people. Mobyjaws56 (talk) 02:04, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PS Due to the block I cannot actually reply to anyone on the SPI page you link to above. I would like to be super clear thought that Sparkles and Moby and Hugh something are all seperate individuals. Thank you : ) Mobyjaws56 (talk) 02:07, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mobyjaws56. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RoySmith, I am unable to reply in the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mobyjaws56 page due to the block, so replying here to you, as I did to Tamzin above, is the only way I can respond. I would like to re-iterate that the IP block is a real annoyance to colleagues working in this building on our network, if the IP block could be lifted it would be appreciated.

I'd also like to reconfirm that the Sparkles user, myself (Moby) and Hugh something are different individuals. The declared COI to our employer is again outlined above, I would sincerely appreciate an Admin's feedback on how one manages the employer requested edits, which are merely factual updates, not trolling, abusive, or dereogatory to anyone. Thank you. Mobyjaws56 (talk) 05:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I note too, as I don't know what tracking wikipedia administrators are now carrying out when I am logged in, that I have had to do more reading to learn what some of the terms above are. A response would be appreciated, thanks - I am assuming we are in very different timezones when I see the timeless to commentary above. Mobyjaws56 (talk) 05:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith - drawing attention to replies, cheers. Mobyjaws56 (talk) 05:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A technical analysis indicates that the four accounts I blocked are almost certainly the same person. You are claiming that you are not, but at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mobyjaws56, you were asked by Tamzin to "please explain how you know each other and the nature of your involvement with the Ian Darling article" and you have failed to do so. Instead, you have made veiled references to "our employer" and "colleagues working in this building" which do not answer the question. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith I certainly have not intended to make veiled references, I want to be very clear there is not a sock or meat puppetry going on. In previous years I have been rebuked for identifying people, and so now have assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that admins would also just use a search engine to see our associations which are clearly laid out on our company website (shark island institute)in Sydney. I cannot however give you the names of the people in the building who hot desk and work on other documentaries. Sparkles is my colleague Alisha, I am Moby and Hugh is a hot desker in a development project. You or @Tamzin could take a look at our site perhaps?

Almost certainly, and certainly are not the same thing, and we are not the same person, I have one single wiki account and that is this one. Many thanks, Mary Mobyjaws56 (talk) 00:38, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mobyjaws56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please see the ongoing conversation above. The accounts with name Sparkles, Moby and Hugh are not sock or meat puppet accounts. Moby (myself, Mary) and Sparkles (Alisha) are colleagues at Shark Island institute, a documentary firm based in Sydney (www.sharkisland.com.au) . Our Executive Director Ian Darling is an active domestic and International documentary film maker, highly regarded by his peers and member of many associations and documentary inititaives. We are often requested to make updates to his wiki entry, as (especially in America) Wiki seems to be the go to page for people to get information about him. We are required to keep his page updated so that when other organisations are taking onformation from wiki to write, for example, a blurb for a film festival, they have the correct information. Yes, I would prefer editors and writers just emailed us and asked for a blurb, but they don't, they draft it from wiki and then send it for approval.

What is more, the pages we update (Ian Darling and our films) are factual edits, we are not trolling other users, we do not make incorrect claims or falsify information on the pages we edit and we do not waste administrators time in creating pages that are not actually information that the Australian Documentary sector and others find useful.

I would appreciate an Admin to take the time to look at the company website and see the team, realise there are more than one person and account with an association to Ian and reconsider this permanent block. The accounts are not the same person, they are not making abusive edits, a COI has previously been declared and the accusation of meat or sock puppetry is incorrect.

Decline reason:

Note than an admin like me cannot lift this block unilaterally, as it is a checkuser block. Only a checkuser may authorize its removal. You say this is not meat puppetry, but then go on to say exactly what meat puppetry is.- different people at the same place doing the same thing. This is treated as sock puppetry because we don't know who is sitting on the other end of the computer operating any particular account. As such, this is indeed meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would note outside the context of the block that it's not Mr. Darling's "wiki entry", but a Wikipedia article about him. Though his input is welcome, and we strive for it to be accurate, he has no special rights to it as the subject. We are not concerned with any requirements imposed upon you as his representative to edit it, or in any benefits to him the presence of an article about him here has. If others choose to use potentially inaccurate information to write about Mr. Darling, that's unfortunate but mainly something he needs to address with them. Just as we tell students and teachers that Wikipedia is not a reliable source and shouldn't be used for scholarly work, it shouldn't be used for media/organization inquiries, at least not without checking the sources used in the article itself. This probably sounds uncaring and bad, but we actually do want the article about him to properly summarize what independent reliable sources say about him- not what he wants to say about himself- and any suggestions in that regard should generally be done as edit requests on Talk:Ian Darling. We do have a strict biographies of living persons policy requiring articles about living people to be well sourced and accurate- but it needs to be done properly. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your note 331dot - the explanation re puppetry is a lot clearer in your terms than in the pages.Mobyjaws56 (talk) 02:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mobyjaws56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My thanks to @331dot for the clarity in response, which has enabled me to better understand, in conjunction with further reading, the puppet allegation and how we have unwittingly behaved as such. I apologise, and understand any frustration earlier admins may have had with my written denials and pleas regarding sock and meat puppetry above. I have mistakenly engaged in correspondence about the two staff members without understanding the underlying demonstration of puppetry 331dot has pointed out.

While I continue to believe the edits made were in good faith, factual and non-damaging, I understand and apologise for the way in which the edits were undertaken with the COI in play. Please accept my request to be unblocked in the belief the block is no longer necessary due to the deeper understanding of the multiple accounts of two employees in the editing process.

I undertake not to engage in singular edits to Ian's page but to make such requests to the TALK page for that article, with the appropriate citations if required, and to continue making other contributions to the Australian Documentary entry pages where COI does not exist.

Further, I would like to reiterate that only two accounts from this IP address are in contention - Sparkles and Moby - my colleague (the Sparkles user) and I have made a COI to the page for Ian Darling (our employer) and commit to making edit requests through the TALK page if the block is lifted. I am unsure how I might further convince admins that we are indeed different people, not 4 accounts run by me, I have no information regarding the wiki technical analysis RoySmith refers to so cannot address that. I can say though, that if language style is a part of that then it would seem we are one and the same as the edit requests come from our employer, Ian. I can invite you again to view our company website where both my colleague Alisha and I can be identified along with Ian.

Regards, Mobyjaws56 (talk)

Decline reason:

This was posted by an IP editor, not Mobyjaws56. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:50, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User-multi error: no username detected (help). Hi there, I am Mobyjaws56 and I did write the above after extensive reading about a block appeal - I am frustrated by the IP issue, as yes, we have an IP in the building obviously, and my account is blocked though I can still login - how do we resolve this 'real, not real' issue? Mobyjaws56 (talk) 23:11, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]