User talk:Moons of Io
YOU CAN'T STOP ME! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.207.117.79 (talk) 11:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Moons of Io! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 10:42, Sunday, July 3, 2022 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
[edit]
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Cadbury World: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. RPI2026F1 (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- OK,thanks. Moons of Io (talk) 17:27, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
David fleming
[edit]Didn't mean to change it meant to make a new one 82.20.1.100 (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for this
[edit]Guess I probably shouldn't edit half-asleep anymore. 😏 Kurtis (talk) 08:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Remove Deletion Tag
[edit]Why are you adding deletion tag in this article Krishnarthiindia (talk) 14:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- do you mean the tag that had previously been in place and then removed without addressing the issue? Moons of Io (talk) 15:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Beate Heister scams
[edit]I can well understand why you removed the rather crude and anonymous revision 1160397748 from Beate Heister but if you look at the edit history of this page, several such edits have been attempted. There really is an active scam campaign linking to this page, and it would be good if it could somehow be addressed directly on the page! Is there a wikipedia tag for this purpose? — OttoMäkelä (talk) 07:46, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I can't imagine that there is anything Wikipedia can do about people claiming to be a celebrity and trying to scam someone, And I can't see how anyone can "use a wikipedia article" to carry out a scam. Moons of Io (talk) 11:00, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Nepalese vs Nepali
[edit]Hi, you may be interested in a WikiProject Nepal discussion I started about the edit warring happening recently regarding “Nepalese” vs “Nepali”. Thanks, Fork99 (talk) 20:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For reverting vandalism on my talk page! First time my page had been violated, I knew it would happen one day. Thank you so much and hope you have a fantastic holiday! Robertus Pius (Talk • Contribs) 14:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |
Edit Reversion
[edit]I noticed you reverted my edit to Laser Kiwi flag. According to the New Zealand Government and Cambridge University Press, the name of the flag is not "Fire the Laser" but "Fire the Lazer". A.FLOCK (talk) 15:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Apathy
[edit]DON'T revert--it's no use. This child gets off on that, and the more you roll back, the more we have to clean up. User:InDimensional, User:My Pants Metal, you too. They're not done. Just report and leave it be. Drmies (talk) 03:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Cheers Moons of Io (talk) 03:37, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- You will find that they vandalize articles about emotions and disturbances--for obvious reasons I think. It's kind of sad. Oh, they're using proxies from North Africa. Drmies (talk) 03:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)your recent edit to the lead of The Cass Review
[edit]I know it is annoying when someone POV pushes a lead of a section, but you clearly know how to revert an edit. The inclusion of this edit did nothing to improve the page and introduced a larger POV and WP:Fringe ideas. Wikipedia:GENSEX As a notifier of the topic nature and that contentious topic rules apply. Please refrain from such edits in the future LunaHasArrived (talk) 12:52, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
