User talk:Muboshgu/Archive 27
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Muboshgu. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
Mike Napoli Page
Thank you I saw the information on Instagram and thought it was official thanks for the info again -Jweiss7 Jweiss7 (talk) 23:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- It's unconfirmed, and could be erroneous. We need to sit tight for a little bit to find out whether or not it happened, and if so, what Boston gets. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
2016 POTUS
I have a question. If the gallerymode: packed-hover violates any of wikipedia's rules, then why would the option be provided? It works on mobile because the last name only whites out a small sliver of the image, and on desktop, natural tendency to mouse on images give you the name. I'm just wondering how an option which Wikipedia provides (and includes Help:Gallery tag) could be in violation of rules. Spartan7W § 14:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- I never said it violates Wikipedia's rules, because I'm not familiar enough with that rule to know if it does or doesn't. I said that text that says "hover here" violates WP:CLICKHERE. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with that point. Just wondering. Spartan7W § 16:09, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Request for comment
As a significant contributor to the article United States presidential election, 2016, your participation in this discussion would be helpful and appreciated. Thank you. --William S. Saturn (talk) 21:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
RfC
There is a Request for Comment now live on the Template talk:User WikiProject United States presidential elections. Your involvement in WikiProject means you may wish to consider commenting on your preferred outcome for this userbox. Spartan7W § 19:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 August 2015
- News and notes: Superprotect, one year later; a contentious RfA
- In the media: Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015, part 2, a community event
- Traffic report: Fighting from top to bottom
- Featured content: Fused lizards, giant mice, and Scottish demons
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Blog: The Hunt for Tirpitz
Nomination of David Denson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Denson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Denson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Venable
Is the outdated tag because it's a GA? Otherwise, most articles are outdated, but I wouldn't want to see them tagged.—Bagumba (talk) 19:43, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, saw the revert notification before your talk page edit over there. I can ask there if you prefer.—Bagumba (talk) 19:45, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Here, there, wherever. I figured a talk page comment was the way to go. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I copied it there.—Bagumba (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Probably better to do it there since it's about that specific article. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:05, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- OK, I copied it there.—Bagumba (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Here, there, wherever. I figured a talk page comment was the way to go. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 August 2015
- Travelogue: Seeing is believing
- Traffic report: Straight Outta Connecticut
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball/Archive 40#Names for lists based on single-game stats
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball#Names_for_lists_based_on_single-game_stats Taffe316 (talk) 04:03, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Rock Shoulders for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rock Shoulders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock Shoulders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 12:02, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
No, but he IS in the Royals organization! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bravesrule384 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
So are you the Wikipedia boss? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bravesrule384 (talk • contribs) 00:40, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 August 2015
- In focus: An increase in active Wikipedia editors
- In the media: Russia temporarily blocks Wikipedia
- News and notes: Re-imagining grants
- Featured content: Out to stud, please call later
- Arbitration report: Reinforcing Arbitration
- Recent research: OpenSym 2015 report
Nomination of Roman Hernandez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman Hernandez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Hernandez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 03:13, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
David Denson has been nominated for Did You Know
 | Hello, Muboshgu. David Denson, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 23:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC) |
Dave Winfield
RE: "B" to "C" class - What are your issues with article? Hotcop2 (talk) 02:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- A number of unsourced statements, referencing the 1992 WS in the Yankees section (which runs through 1990), one sentence paragraphs poorly organized within sections. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:08, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- I can work on the sources and the one-sentence paragraphs. The mention of the 1992 World Series in the Yankees section, however, is in response to the Steinbrenner slight and makes perfect sense in that paragraph. Hotcop2 (talk) 13:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Roberto Clemente
Yes, I am aware. However, players were only credited with 1 appearance per year during that time. See: http://www.sportradar.us/2012/07/09/midsummer-classics-celebrating-mlbs-all-star-game — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.78.48 (talk) 22:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Not according to that site, no, but that site isn't an "official" recognition of MLB All-Stars. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Will this site suffice? http://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/leaders_most_asgame.shtml — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.78.48 (talk) 19:27, August 30, 2015
- That says he was an All-Star 15 times in 12 seasons. That's exactly the way I've been editing the page. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Greg Bird
According to MLB, Greg Bird was born in Aurora, Colorado. Also, when you search his name on Google, it says he's from Aurora, Colorado. Darren64 MC (talk) 05:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- They're wrong. He himself has said he's from Memphis. I've emailed MLB.com and Baseball Reference so that they can correct themselves. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Rico Noel
Sorry about that. I misread the listing. A few minutes ago I was reading about him and I thought "He's a pinch runner? Wait... crap!" RevanFan (talk) 04:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ha no problem, nobody's perfect and all. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Scott Alexander
Just thought I'd let you know the baseball player exists at Scott Alexander (baseball). So I don't know if you want to make the page into a disambiguation page or whatever but the player article already exists.--Yankees10 19:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, good. It should probably be moved to "Scott Alexander" once it's unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- I was thinking a disambiguation because of the screenwriter, but I don't have an opinion either way.--Yankees10 19:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't see there was a screenwriter... Where is that page located? Also, another question: you created Alexander's page late last night but I only saw about Alexander's promotion an hour ago at most. Where do you get your promotion intel? It's obviously better than my sources. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, you mean Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski. I guess either a dab page or hat note would work. Not sure which is better. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah that's the one. It's kind of odd that Scott Alexander wasn't just re-directing there in the first place. I just happened to see it on Twitter last night that he was getting called up. I think it was from his high school or college or something, I don't remember. I figured if it ended up being false I would just speedy delete or re-direct it.--Yankees10 20:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- As best I can tell, someone (or someones) kept recreating it as a page for a British millionaire that kept getting deleted, so an admin WP:SALTed it. You always seem to be ahead of the curve on who the new guy is getting promoted. The best I have figured is to follow MLBRosterMoves. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yup, that's my number one place to check also. There sometimes a little behind, but that's generally where I get my transaction news from.--Yankees10 20:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- You do well at keeping ahead. Well, the Alexander baseball page has been moved to the main locale per my request that I didn't change. If you feel a dab page is best, go right ahead. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yup, that's my number one place to check also. There sometimes a little behind, but that's generally where I get my transaction news from.--Yankees10 20:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- As best I can tell, someone (or someones) kept recreating it as a page for a British millionaire that kept getting deleted, so an admin WP:SALTed it. You always seem to be ahead of the curve on who the new guy is getting promoted. The best I have figured is to follow MLBRosterMoves. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah that's the one. It's kind of odd that Scott Alexander wasn't just re-directing there in the first place. I just happened to see it on Twitter last night that he was getting called up. I think it was from his high school or college or something, I don't remember. I figured if it ended up being false I would just speedy delete or re-direct it.--Yankees10 20:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- I was thinking a disambiguation because of the screenwriter, but I don't have an opinion either way.--Yankees10 19:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
WikiCup 2015 September newsletter
The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.
In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far 
Casliber (submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was 
Coemgenus (submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.
The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:
Cas Liber (submissions), who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points), second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
Harrias (submissions), second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
West Virginian (submissions), from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.- Rodw (submissions), from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
Rationalobserver (submissions), from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
Calvin999 (submissions), also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.
The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.
Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!
Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 September 2015
- Special report: Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flow placed on ice
- Discussion report: WMF's sudden reversal on Wiki Loves Monuments
- Featured content: Brawny
- In the media: Orangemoody sockpuppet case sparks widespread coverage
- Traffic report: You didn't miss much
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
deleted good content?
fucking asshole Itsmokoty (talk) 03:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Glad to be of service. Have a nice day. :) – Muboshgu (talk) 03:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Beta
Hey, I have a question. With the new *beta* editing, how does one get the name of a baseball player highlighted? meaning, what characters are used around the name to get the blue-highlight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bravesrule384 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't know. I use the classic editor. There must be a "help" page for beta features. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. Next question, Lol...how does one get a new row added, using the classic editing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bravesrule384 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Do you really have to identify Nolan Ryan as "right" in the photo caption of the picture with Andy Pettitte?
Assume that a Wikipedia user who knows nothing about American baseball inadvertently goes to the article on Nolan Ryan. Ryan's photo immediately appears in the info box. There are three additional photos of Nolan Ryan in the article BEFORE the user sees the photo of Ryan with Andy Pettitte. By this time, the user knows what Nolan Ryan looks like. It's silly and unnecessary to have "right" after Ryan's name in the photo caption.
Anthony22 (talk) 22:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- You never know who is doing what in an article. Someone might scroll down without looking at pictures. We can't assume that they looked at the lead image. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Team names in links
On the one hand, it's good you reverted my edit at David Denson since I forgot to remove the, so it had bad grammar like "He committed to play play college baseball for the Hawaii." However, I don't think WP:EGG applies, as WP:SPECIFICLINK would dictate that readers would expect a link to the Hawaii team, not its location. I had been as guilty as any editor before of leaving Wikipedia titles verbatim in the links, but I think it's OK to pipe in cases like this when the team name is not referenced anywhere else in the prose, making it trivial at best. It'd be a different story with something link New York Yankees in Derek Jeter's article, which makes use go Yankees.—Bagumba (talk) 23:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- I noticed the grammar issue only after I reverted it. I don't see how WP:SPECIFICLINK applies; even if piped, it will still go to the team article. I should've linked to WP:EASTEREGG. When I see the word "Hawaii" or "Wisconsin" as the sole text of a wikilink, I personally expect it to be a link to those particular states. That's how my brain seems to work. I think the team name is worth including without piping, and piping can cause problems. One example of this is Kevin Newman (baseball), who was promoted in July or August from the West Virginia Black Bears to the West Virginia Power. So nice of Pittsburgh to name two Class A affiliates "West Virginia". – Muboshgu (talk) 23:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- SPECFICLINK: "Always link to the article on the most specific topic appropriate to the context from which you link: it will generally contain more focused information, as well as links to more general topics." The relevant example listed would be "[[Requiem (Mozart)|Requiem]]" vs "[[Requiem]]". In the case of players, they play for the team at the location, not the location itself. Ideally, the team article will have links in its prose that lead to the city article, for those who really need more info on where it is. I don't think EASTEREGG applies, as I don't believe any information is being hidden here by the pipe. Most sources I read outside of WP usually just list the city name, not location + team name, upon first mention. This is even more likely for minor league teams that nobody but a diehard MiLB fan would know (or be interested in).—Bagumba (talk) 00:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- More clarification: It's not that SPECIFICLINK wasn't already being followed, it was more of an explanation on why EGG doesnt apply, because one should expect/want the team to be linked, not the location. Regarding the West Virginia case, I agree that would need disambiguation, but I don't think that exception necessitates always needed to include the team name.—Bagumba (talk) 00:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- SPECFICLINK: "Always link to the article on the most specific topic appropriate to the context from which you link: it will generally contain more focused information, as well as links to more general topics." The relevant example listed would be "[[Requiem (Mozart)|Requiem]]" vs "[[Requiem]]". In the case of players, they play for the team at the location, not the location itself. Ideally, the team article will have links in its prose that lead to the city article, for those who really need more info on where it is. I don't think EASTEREGG applies, as I don't believe any information is being hidden here by the pipe. Most sources I read outside of WP usually just list the city name, not location + team name, upon first mention. This is even more likely for minor league teams that nobody but a diehard MiLB fan would know (or be interested in).—Bagumba (talk) 00:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 September 2015
- Gallery: Being Welsh
- Featured content: Killed by flying debris
- News and notes: The Swedish Wikipedia's controversial two-millionth article
- Traffic report: Mass media production traffic
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Harry Reid
It's a known fact he has mob ties and that its speculated he was assaulted. There is speculation in almost every Wikipedia profile. Your taking this personal. Casino is a non fiction movie and his mob ties are known. Who are you the designated editor? Skinny jones (talk) 22:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- The idea that Harry Reid has mob ties is an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory, which does not belong on Wikipedia. In fact, the idea that Reid is in cahoots with the mob goes directly against all evidence, like the time he turned down a $12,000 bribe and they allegedly tried to kill him with a car bomb. If you find any other such speculation on Wikipedia, please remove it or bring it to the attention of others. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Casino
Can I at least write that he had Mob ties in Las Vegas? That is very true and known Skinny jones (talk) 22:22, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Anything about mob ties in Vegas has to be verifiable with reliable sources. If you meant to put it on Reid's article, it would have to be relevant to his article. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
he has taken many bribes your biased and I feel sorry for the public that wants to know what our politicians are really doing. Harry Reid has taken so many bribes got comped by Sam Rosenthal a mob front man and lied about it.http://beforeitsnews.com/u-s-politics/2013/01/harry-reid-in-massive-bribe-scandal-2445626.html the source you showed me even said Casino used what he said almost word for word in which he lied. "Reid may not be the most colorful figure in Washington, but his career is far more interesting than that of the average senator. In politics, Nevada is the next best thing to Louisiana. To take just one example, is there another U.S. senator who has been part of the inspiration for a character in a Martin Scorsese film? (A character played by Dick Smothers, no less.) In Casino, Robert DeNiro's character melts down in front of the Nevada Gaming Commission after the commission denies him a license to operate a casino. The scene is loosely based on a December 1978 hearing when Reid was the commission's chairman, and some of the dialogue spoken by Smothers is taken directly from Reid's words during the hearing".Who says what news sources are ok and which are not, you? That's sad because it's truth not hear say. You obviously have a favorable view of him for quoting him turning down bribes. Why can't I quote sources that says he has taken bribes multiple times?http://m.reviewjournal.com/columns-blogs/steve-sebelius/reid-scandal-shows-worst-wounds-are-self-inflicted So can I say anything about the corruption that surrounded his career as a politician? Or is that not ok with you master? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skinny jones (talk • contribs) 19:21, September 11, 2015
- Denigrating somebody the way you have (sarcastically calling me "master") isn't the best way to go about this. Wikipedia runs on consensus and you have to be civil with people who disagree with you. To get consensus, I suggest posting what you want to be done on Talk:Harry Reid to get feedback from the entire community. To the specifics, I have some issue with those sources. The Review Journal piece is an op-ed, and not the best sort of source to use per WP:RS. It certainly doesn't prove that he's ever taken taken a bribe. With his situation with John Swallow, it seems according to the WSJ that it was an attempt to bribe Reid, but not a successful one. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
DYK for David Denson
 | On 12 September 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article David Denson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in August 2015, David Denson became the first active baseball player affiliated with a Major League Baseball organization to publicly come out as gay? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Denson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 15:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
hold on
First of all don't ever come to me like this again, second my information on my stuff is very 100% correct so if I feel that I need to correct something because there's an error on it, I'm going to correct it, and third Frank Thomas is my cousin and has told me several times that even though he wasn't on the postseason roster because he contributed to the team that season automatically makes him a World Series Champion learn your facts before your editing privileges be taken away thank you Bigchubz (talk) 22:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- WP:BASEBALL consensus is that we only list WS championships for people who are on the postseason roster. Further, don't threaten me again. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
talkback
That's BS because WP can acknowledge a player for getting a ring but not as a champion, what a load of crock and inaccurate you are. Every person wants the world to know their accomplishments and you are trying to deny people to learn that about them because they weren't on the postseason roster. What about what they did for the team throughout the season to get to the postseason, oh that doesn't matter right. Well then shame on you for being the loser that you are and that wasn't a threat that was a lesson. Thank You Bigchubz (talk) 22:58, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Averages
FWIW, I was trying to move away from ppg and rpg in Malone's article, and just use "points" and "rebounds". When talking about averages, it just seems redundant to keep mentioning "per game". At any rate, there's too many edit conflicts when saving, so I'll back off on helping with the copyvios. Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 20:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- I was trying to use ppg and rpg more because that helps to reduce the plagiarism. We can take turns editing it. I think I'm done editing it for now, I need a break. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- LOL. It's kinda gaming the system if the point is just to fool the tool; materially, "ppg" and "points" convey the same info. I was trying to void getting sucked into the ITN obit blitz, but I've apparently failed. I'll spend a bit more time, since you've graciously offered to take a break, but I doubt I'll be as prolific as you.—Bagumba (talk) 20:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah that's true, but some people will simply look at "total match candidates" and the bolded text to see how bad the problem is perceived to be. I figured changing "points" and "rebounds" to "ppg" and "rpg" would make a difference, but maybe it isn't necessary. Hopefully we can get this posted by tonight. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yikes. That second tool is more powerful, and there is still a ways to go. See Talk:Moses_Malone#Copyright_violation.—Bagumba (talk) 21:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah that's true, but some people will simply look at "total match candidates" and the bolded text to see how bad the problem is perceived to be. I figured changing "points" and "rebounds" to "ppg" and "rpg" would make a difference, but maybe it isn't necessary. Hopefully we can get this posted by tonight. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:35, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- LOL. It's kinda gaming the system if the point is just to fool the tool; materially, "ppg" and "points" convey the same info. I was trying to void getting sucked into the ITN obit blitz, but I've apparently failed. I'll spend a bit more time, since you've graciously offered to take a break, but I doubt I'll be as prolific as you.—Bagumba (talk) 20:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Denver Broncos roster navbox
Hi, your edit today to Template:Denver Broncos roster navbox left some code appearing on the public page. It looks like this: <small style="font-size:85%;(IR). Are you able to re-visit this page and have a look? I don't know how to fix it. Thanks. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 00:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yep, I noticed it and already fixed it. I'm in the middle of fixing the others. I had started a thread about it at WT:NFL. Thanks for checking in about it. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Black Lives Matter
I apologize for undoing your edit, but I feel that I'm within the "bold" policy. Per your suggestion, I've started a discussion of my edits on BLM's talk page. I've also reinstated my edits because I think they comply with your main objection, which is that they're backed by RS. Let me ask you the same courtesy you asked me -- please don't revert until other voices have weighed in. Scaleshombre (talk) 01:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for starting a discussion. But the way it works is we keep it at the most recent consensus version until a discussion decides to make a change. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Full Frontal with Samantha Bee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 September 2015
- Editorial: No access is no answer to closed access
- News and notes: Byrd and notifications leave, but page views stay; was a terror suspect editing Wikipedia?
- In the media: Is there life on Mars?
- Featured content: Why did the emu cross the road?
- Traffic report: Another week
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
TAFI
If you want to you can please review my noms at TAFI. I need some more input. Thanks. Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement/Nominations.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- I was going to snow close the AFD too but hadn't gotten to it. It seems a shame to have an article on a 9 year old kid that we all know shouldn't be there, linked to one of our most popular articles right now (his dad's).--Milowent • hasspoken 02:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with you that it should not be an article, but we should follow the normal protocol. That included having an uninvolved person (admin or non) close the AfD, instead of us, who voted on it. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 September 2015
- In the media: PETA makes "monkey selfie" a three-way copyright battle; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Featured content: Inside Duke Humfrey's Library
- WikiProject report: Dancing to the beat of a... wikiproject?
- Traffic report: ¡Viva la Revolución! Kinda.
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Apology at Mookie Betts
Sorry about that. I thought I was undoing the IP's edit, didn't notice you'd already reverted him and ended up reverting you. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 02:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- That's okay. It happens to the best of us :) – Muboshgu (talk) 02:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Precious again
baseball awards
Thank you for quality work on baseball, such as featured topic Major League Baseball awards and the winning people such as Derek Jeter and Johnny Evers, many featured in the DYK and ITN sections, for articles on elections, speeches and a poem, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
A year ago, you were the 986th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
What's wrong now ?
Irak becommes in blue colour, I'm aware that Iraq also is used. But please explain to me why Trumps's first statements about the US Foreign Policy he wants to conduct are censored, please. Washington Post and CNN are reliable sources. So - what was wrong this time ? Boeing720 (talk) 22:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- First off, I don't know of anyone who spells it "Irak". As I said on the talk page, though, this information doesn't belong on his bio. It belongs on his campaign page. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States House of Representatives elections in South Carolina, 2016, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fleming. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2015
- Recent research: Wiktionary special; newbies, conflict and tolerance; Is Wikipedia's search function inferior?
- Tech news: Tech news in brief
MLB playoff summary template
I implemented a sandbox version of the template that alters the appearance for a series with no games played. Please let me know if this is what you had in mind, and if you see any potential issues with deploying the change to the actual template. isaacl (talk) 15:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- Looks good! – Muboshgu (talk) 18:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Your points on ITN talk
I've closed your ITN talk points on the Healey nomination. It served no purpose. The nom went through the normal process and got posted, there was no reason to continue the discussion. Your tone was hardly civil either. Each nom gets judged independently, no point in comparing. I suggest that you take a step back, stop slinging pointless (and incorrect) accusations of bias around and enjoy editing! Cheers! Fgf10 (talk) 19:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- I'm having a discussion here about the process at ITN, and you're not right to close it. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:06, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- No, you seem to be having a hissy fit, but I'll just let you rant if that makes you happy. Fgf10 (talk) 19:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- You don't agree with me and that's fine, but I see a larger issue at play here. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
- No, you seem to be having a hissy fit, but I'll just let you rant if that makes you happy. Fgf10 (talk) 19:48, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Top25
Could you archive it correctly please? The report that is currently on the main page is very obsolete and people might think it is recent if it's on the front page. I was thinking we could put a message like
on the front page.
r a y u k k. 20:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- This links from the main page? The update is being worked on. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:15, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oh ok, never mind then. r a y u k k. 20:20, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Message missing
You left me a message regarding a recent update to a page (The Shot Heard 'Round The World). When I visited my talk page, I found that your message was available in my history, but the current version of the talk page was blank.
Could you clarify what is wrong with the citation I provided? I was careful to follow what I thought were the rules. If you would please tell me what I did wrong, it will help with my learning. Mgg4 (talk) 02:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Message received. I bow to your ownership of the page in question. I thought I was adding a neutral tone bit of information. My viewing of that episode happened to lead me to, in a round about way, find the article on Wikipedia. I should have known by the absence of the entry, given the age of the episode, that the information was not wanted on such a pristine site such as Wikipedia. Thank you for your efforts. I'm moving on to other things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgg4 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 October 2015
- Op-ed: Walled gardens of corruption
- Traffic report: Reality is for losers
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Warning: Contains GMOs
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Scope col/row
What does the scope="col" do, for example, here?—GoldRingChip 12:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- It clearly demonstrates the row and column headers. Read Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Accessibility for more. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:37, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- OK, thanks.—GoldRingChip 19:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
This is not America
Wikipedia is not American - it is global. Your comments are inappropriate and highly ethnocentric. Further, TW uses that format which is why it was entered in that format. The Dissident Aggressor 18:58, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Chase Utley is American, hence his page uses MDY format. Perhaps I should have been more clear in my edit summary about that. I use DMY format on non-American pages. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks - that makes sense. BTW, I didn't follow you to Baseball rules, rather was looking for something to wikilink in the text I added to both Utley and Tejada's articles. The Dissident Aggressor 19:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- It's fine if you did, that page needs some work. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- BTW, I think the change you made on Utley, broke the template. The Dissident Aggressor 19:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- I'll take a look. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- BTW, I think the change you made on Utley, broke the template. The Dissident Aggressor 19:27, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- It's fine if you did, that page needs some work. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks - that makes sense. BTW, I didn't follow you to Baseball rules, rather was looking for something to wikilink in the text I added to both Utley and Tejada's articles. The Dissident Aggressor 19:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Days of the week and Birthdays
What's wrong with including what day of the week the person's birthday fell on anyway? To say that including this detail is vandalism is silly. BB (talk) 04:44, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Who called it vandalism? It's edit warring, and against the consensus of every single biographical article on Wikipedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Dispute opened
The IP has entered a dispute on Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#talk:Clayton Kershaw. Spanneraol (talk) 05:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Wow. Well, my $.02 are added. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:59, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!
https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States House Select Committee on Benghazi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Hanna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 October 2015
- WikiConference report: US gathering sees speeches from Andrew Lih, AfroCrowd, and the Archivist of the United States
- News and notes: 2015–2016 Q1 fundraising update sparks mailing list debate
- Traffic report: Screens, Sport, Reddit, and Death
- Featured content: A fistful of dollars
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Val Demings page
I've never seen a NOMINEE with that political box on the right, or whatever you want to call it. At first glance, it looks like she was an elected representative. Only people who win the primary election have that, never seen it otherwise. Just found it misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.154.125 (talk) 23:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Infoboxes are helpful for summarizing key points for a subject. Plenty of nominees have them. See Robert Sarvis, Randy Altschuler, Danny Tarkanian, E. W. Jackson for just a few examples. Everyone should have one. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes for more information. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
No don't get me wrong, I'm just fine with personal infoboxes. I'm talking about how she also has a box for "democrat nominee" on top of that. I haven't seen that with anyone else, including the people you linked to with the exception of Robert Sarvis. Those are the only two. Again, that's only ever reserved for people who are elected in the general election. Maybe you got confused because I also deleted her personal infobox in addition to her political nominee box, I shouldn't have done that.68.224.154.125 (talk) 08:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)68.224.154.125 (talk) 08:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
DYK for David Stearns
| On 23 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article David Stearns, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that David Stearns is the youngest general manager in Major League Baseball at 30 years of age? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Stearns. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 13:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
You just left a waning for this editor. I just un-did an edit of theirs at Jake Arrieta. I usually check recent contributions for this kind of malicious edit and sure enough all his edit are about changing atheletes teams to one from Pittsburgh. Not sure how to proceed. Buster Seven Talk 17:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- If the behavior is continuing, I'd say WP:AIV. Those edits are vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- I just took a look. It's the only edit made since the Cervelli one yesterday. Last warning was level 3, so I gave level 4, which is the last warning before reporting to AIV. We could report the user at any time for being a vandalism-only account, none of their edits have been constructive. Thanks for reverting the edit. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Thurman Munson Citations
Hello Muboshgu,
All of the data points I posted on the Thurman Munson page are available on his BaseballReference.com page, including his postseason gamelog. The Johnny Bench comparison points are similarly available on his BaseballReference.com page. I will figure out how to link these citations to the page.
Christopherlhahn (talk) 19:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- Not all of your data is on B Ref. That thing about the baseball card, for instance, read like an unsourced opinion. For more information on how to cite sources, please read Wikipedia:Citing sources and Help:Footnotes. Feel free to ask me any specific questions you might have. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election, October 2015
| On 24 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election, October 2015, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to members of the United States House of Representatives, the October 2015 election to succeed John Boehner as Speaker of the House has turned the body into a "banana republic"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election, October 2015. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:2004 World Series.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:2004 World Series.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 October 2015
- Editorial: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In the media: "Wikipedia's hostility to women"
- Special report: One year of GamerGate, or how I learned to stop worrying and love bare rule-level consensus
- Featured content: A more balanced week
- Arbitration report: Four ArbCom cases ongoing
- Traffic report: Hiding under the covers of the Internet
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Project Baseball
Thanks for the project baseball invite, have accepted! JoshDonaldson20 (talk) 04:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Always feel free to discuss any issues. Happy editing! – Muboshgu (talk) 04:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
DOMA
Look up the dictionary definition of the word "effect," and compare the other usage of the word in the U.S. Constitution. What is so difficult about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VEChicago (talk • contribs) 19:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- We don't engage in original research and need reliable sources for all content. You're providing your own synthesis for possible point of view-pushing. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
DOMA entry
To camouflage the sort of thuggery I have run up against by suggesting I am "pushing a point of view" is indicative that you yourself(-ves) are doing that very thing, by peremptorily excising my commentary without consultation or discussion. I only received automated notice after the deed was done.
This is an issue that has not been litigated; ergo, it is not possible to cite an external source. But one is not necessary in this case. Former Congressman Barr misunderstood the use of the noun "effect" in Article IV. We don't need a court decision to explain that any more clearly. This contention is proved by consulting any dictionary as well as the Constitution itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VEChicago (talk • contribs) 19:52, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- If you're contending that Barr misinterpreted the word "effect", surely you can find a source that backs up your claim. Otherwise, we have only your word that this is the "correct" interpretation of the Constitution, something which lawyers can determine should be interpreted in numerous ways on numerous issues. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
That is an utterly risible statement in light of the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling from this past April, which included the directive that all U.S. states must henceforth recognize the marriages of same-sex persons equally across all states. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VEChicago (talk • contribs) 16:00, October 30, 2015
- Obviously you're new here and not up on how all of this works. For instance, we try to stay civil with each other; saying that my comment is "utterly risible" is not a good way to work together.
- Please read these guides on getting started:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
– Muboshgu (talk) 20:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
I would submit that being thusly thin-skinned is at the root of the problem. The statement was indeed risible, as it suggests you completely neglected to factor in the relevant Supreme Court case. While the Court did not expressly address Barr's use (or misuse) of the word "effect," the decision answers the question for us with its directive, which cites the "Full Faith and Credit" clause as its basis. The idea of a different interpretation of "effect" was hatched by Barr himself and was thereby proven baseless. ** VEChicago (talk) 20:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- If you think the people who edit Wikipedia are constitutional scholars, I'm sorry to disappoint you. But again, we need verification for anything that goes on Wikipedia. You'd get further if you sought some, rather than trying to take shots at someone you don't know. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
And the thinly-veiled accusation with which you began this exchange, that I was "pushing" a point of view (and by extension, therefore, submitting suspect material) was certainly not a taking a "shot," was it. ** VEChicago (talk) 20:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- I said "possibly", because I still don't know if you are or not. Provide some sources for this interpretation. Noted constitutional scholars will surely have them out there which can verify what you're saying, and in which case it can stay up. Or if it's from Obergefell, clarify where in the decision it says this. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Oh, good grief.... I just stated it did not come directly from Obergefell minutes ago in a prior paragraph, but it was dealt with indirectly. Barr was not a party to the suit, and there would have been no need for the Court to have ruled on his contention directly. Furthermore, Barr's idea was so off-base and bespoke such an amateurish misunderstanding of Article IV that it might even have been viewed as an affront to the Court for any of the parties to the suit to have brought it up. If you want to find the source of "pushing a point of view" in this issue, I would suggest you look to those who cling, more than a decade later, to this fanciful meme hatched by Barr. It was and is an attempt to cast aspersions on the Supreme Court's reasoning and authority. ** VEChicago (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Again, it's on you to provide sources for changes you want to make. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Japan Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akira Nakamura. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations on 5,000,000 articles
 | There are currently 6,907,848 articles on Wikipedia. |
for all your contributions, thank you.
Smallbones(smalltalk) 13:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost's reorganization plan—we need your help
- News and notes: English Wikipedia reaches five million articles
- In the media: The world's Wikipedia gaps; Google and Wikipedia accused of tying Ben Carson to NAMBLA
- Arbitration report: A second attempt at Arbitration enforcement
- Traffic report: Canada, the most popular nation on Earth
- Recent research: Student attitudes towards Wikipedia; Jesus, Napoleon and Obama top "Wikipedia social network"; featured article editing patterns in 12 languages
- Featured content: Birds, turtles, and other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Community letter: Five million articles
Editor of the Week
One of my self-appointed weekly tasks is handing out the Editor of the Week for the Editor Retention Project WP:WER. Today's recipient is User Spanneraol. If I could have I would have given a dozen awards to all you Baseball editors. Your project's diligence and monitoring keep the wheels on the tracks for so many articles. Buster Seven Talk 13:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
- Spanneraol is deserving an award like that. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Arb enforcement
I've requested arbitration enforcement related to the Huma Abedin editor with an axe to grind. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I was waiting for that, as opposed to getting involved in an edit war. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
