User talk:Neo-Brasidas

Welcome!

Hello, Neo-Brasidas! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dr. K. 04:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Neo-Brasidas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The rules say I can file an unblock request and so I'm submitting one on five grounds: 1. the block is the result of an underhanded strategy executed by Ashmedai 119 meant to terminate new "threats" instead of proactively opening channels for discussion (proven by Ashmedai 119 correlating me with the "Deucalionite" account twice and never personally approaching me to collaborate), 2. a false positive from a duck test is still false, 3. never was I notified of any witch-hunt proceedings and was never given a chance to even defend myself against the laughably wrong straw-man accusations filed against me by Ashmedai 119 who has continuously suppressed my good faith edits with Jingiby, 4. causation and correlation are not the same: correcting parts of a controversial page doesn't make me controversial and asking for help as a last resort from someone who welcomed you doesn't suffice to eternally banish anyone from anywhere, 5. my contributions were all done with the best of intentions and I've actually improved some neglected sectors of this encyclopedia. In closing, Ashmedai 119's false profile of me, operating on racist assumptions, can be countered point for point and if given the chance, I can demonstrate to the community what is ultimately a terrible misunderstanding. Neo-Brasidas (talk) 00:50, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Firstly, having checked the relevant editing histories fairly thoroughly, I have seen evidence which encourages the belief that this account is a block-evading sockpuppet. Fortunately, not all of the evidence was described in the sockpuppet investigation. Secondly, whether this account is a sockpuppet or not, it has been responsible for persistent tendentious editing, refusing to acknowledge consensus or to edit collaboratively, and unblocking the account would not benefit the project. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.