User talk:Pollock's

Welcome!

Hello, Pollock's, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Xx236 (talk) 07:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please obey

WP:Manual_of_Style/Lists Xx236 (talk) 07:57, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment No reference has surprised me. You don't quote any source in your list.Xx236 (talk) 07:11, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swaleh Naqvi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swaleh Naqvi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swaleh Naqvi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schwing (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 17:22, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pollock's (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked for no reason other than I am making some good contributions. Wikipedia don't deserve good contributors. I created my account on 23 October 2017 and used it my academic research purposes. For a while, I was too busy in my PhD in University of Copenhagen. I resume my editing last month. I don't know why I'm blocked like that. I affirm, I've no account other than this and used IP editing before creating this account. Any uninvolved admin may please consider my unblock request. Happy editing. Pollock's (talk) 17:55, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 19:41, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MER-C When no one explained why I'm blocked, show me when I made disruption in the period of stay on WP. Explain! Pollock's (talk) 19:54, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to explain what you're doing (and why) privately, please e-mail me.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:58, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I received your e-mail but it doesn't completely address my concerns. I need to understand why you wish to continue editing Wikipedia yet not with your main account.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2018 Hong Kong Cricket Sixes

The article 2018 Hong Kong Cricket Sixes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article was WP:TOOSOON, it appears that the tournament was actually postponed to next year so there will never be a 2018 Hong Kong Cricket Sixes. Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 07:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]