User talk:Prepelos

Welcome!

Hello, Prepelos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Bookandcoffee 21:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Emily Osment, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. NrDg 13:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in The Haunting Hour Volume One: Don't Think About It Soundtrack

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Haunting Hour Volume One: Don't Think About It Soundtrack, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Haunting Hour Volume One: Don't Think About It Soundtrack is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Haunting Hour Volume One: Don't Think About It Soundtrack, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 02:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hamas

i dislike people who wont STOP BUGGING ME so stop it you are hurting my feeling im wasting my whole summer editing and clearing articles that have been vandalized and Hamas are not a terrorist group in the Muslim' point of view. 7:38 Please don't reply 29 August 2007 user:Prepelos

I think you have me confused with someone else. --NrDg 20:48, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Allie DiMeco. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Leuko 21:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:200px-Lalaine inyg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:200px-Lalaine inyg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:200px-Lalaine inyg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:200px-Lalaine inyg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bs156.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bs156.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Zach-Cody-tv-11.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Zach-Cody-tv-11.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bs156.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bs156.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bs157.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bs157.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bs207.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bs207.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OWN

Please read WP:OWN. Comments such as "STOP EDITING MY WORK"[1] are inappropriate. By contributing to Wikipedia, you agree to allow your work to be edited. --Yamla 20:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack

This is inappropriate. Please see WP:NPA. We do not tolerate personal attacks here. --Yamla 20:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy Wu: Homecoming Warrior (disambiguation)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wendy Wu: Homecoming Warrior (disambiguation), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://channel-disney-wendy-wu.cn. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 11:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BrendaSongBeavermovie.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BrendaSongBeavermovie.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 11:44, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BrendaSongBeavermovie.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BrendaSongBeavermovie.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Song

When you are editing this article, could you please use spaces after punctuation, and put movie and TV series titles in italics using ''[[Movie Title]]'' or ''Movie Title'' form, depending on whether it's linked or not? Also, it's discouraged to wikilink another article more than once in a section, and even less would be helpful as the Song article seems pretty full of links from the lists of shows (see WP:MOSLINK#Overlinking_and_underlinking:_what.27s_the_best_ratio.3F). Finally, some links need what is called "disambiguation" to point to the right page, eg if "American" is needed, it might need to be written [[United States|American]]. Gimmetrow 14:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Song template

You didn't create it! I did! lol, just look here. All you did was add the Filmography and Television links at the end.

It was my first template and it took me a while to get it right. Ospinad 18:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Normal 320.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Normal 320.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Normal 320.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Normal 320.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Emily Osment, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. NrDg 16:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I just noticed you have an old copy of the Brenda Song article on your user page. This includes the fair use image Image:Wendy_Wu.jpg, which isn't supposed to be used outside articles. Gimmetrow 23:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:13766776.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:13766776.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 23:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:948097659 38b4cfd885.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:948097659 38b4cfd885.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Lupo 10:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Just wanted to drop a note and say thanks for being active with your Wikipedia page. Not many people do. As someone who loves this site, I think it's great to see someone who takes such care with their own article. :) ~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.229.9.177 (talk) 22:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Osment

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Emily Osment. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Kww (talk) 22:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Emily Osment. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kww (talk) 22:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Brenda Song. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kww (talk) 18:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been blocked for your violation of WP:3RR. Additionally, you should take the time to read WP:RS as at least some of the sources you have been adding, such as nndb, are not sufficient. --Yamla (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you didn't get the point

I can see that you didn't listen and understand, and deleted my previous comment without considering it, so I'll repeat it. We have many bad articles on Wikipedia. There are some articles that tell us what an actress's favorite toenail polish is, or what she named her pet goldfish when she was in the third grade. When I notice such things, I delete them, because they are not notable facts. Many other editors do the same thing. These things do not belong in Wikipedia. There's a whole page devoted to What Wikipedia is not, and you should read it as well. WP:NOTABILITY is another important page to read. It's also important to understand that when multiple editors remove your material, just forcing it back in is not the right approach. As I warned you yesterday, if another editor removed your material, putting it back in would get you blocked. Not surprisingly, when I got up this morning, I looked, and someone had removed it, you had put it back in, and you had been blocked. Please learn from this. It's always nice to have another editor on the project, so long as they understand what the project is about.Kww (talk) 17:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brenda Song 2

In [2] you said: "Soundtarcks section not effecting the section. And musical performances in show can be added right since selena gomez has this text which i keep on removing but it just keeps on getting reverting." Where is this? The Selena Gomez article has a music section with three lines. There is no comparison.

If you don't justify your edits on the talk page, I'll revert them. In particular, why add unnecessary section headers? Why repeat links? Why repeat content multiple times? I get the impression you're trying to make the article bigger, presumably because you're a big fan. No problem with being a fan, but filling the article with trivia and tables makes her look *worse*, not better. Have some restraint with the trivia and tables, and let her genuine accomplishments show through. Gimmetrow 22:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brendasongtb.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Brendasongtb.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 17:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Brendasongtb.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brendasongtb.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB as a reliable source

Just some light reading about what parts of IMDB we can use as a reference and why.

Wikipedia:Reliable_source_examples#Use_of_electronic_or_online_sources

Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_5#IMDB

Basically we can rely on credit info as it is supplied by the studios. Everything else is dubious as IMDB has not shown that they do any real fact checking on their own. Some of the stuff at IMDB originates from Wikipedia. --NrDg 18:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Selena Gomez in Burnin' Up Music Video

She's in the scene titled "Double Inferno", after Nick goes through the lasers. She had a "cameo" appearance in the music video. You can check on YouTube. She's also shown poolside with Nick in some scenes. Just try hard to find her with Nick, she IN THE VIDEO!Empezardesdecero1718 (talk) 15:02, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to message on my user page

Hi there. First of all, please do not leave messages on my user page. The proper place to leave messages for me is on my talk page.

As far as your actual message, I see you have copied it to WP:ANI. I will take a look and may reply there. Thanks! --Jaysweet (talk) 16:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh i am so sorry. I was just in a hurry and did not notice where i placed it. Sorry. I was in a real hurry because Voice4Ever and other accounts linked with this puppeteer must be busy making more reverting edits.

Multiple accounts

Hello. I had hoped you would learn from the situation at commons. In light of this list of accounts, please choose one account to use from now on. Gimmetrow 18:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your disruptive editing with sockpuppets has exhausted my patience. No more warnings. Gimmetrow 19:18, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BrendaSongPassThePlate.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BrendaSongPassThePlate.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I Don't Think About It

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article I Don't Think About It, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Since it has not been covered nor appeared on any notable music chart, it fails WP:MUSIC.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Pokerdance (talk) 22:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christina Aguilera (disambiguation)

The article Christina Aguilera (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page. The main article, Christina Aguilera, contains a hatnote to her self-titled album. There's no need for a separate page to link to Aguilera's discography or awards.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Σxplicit 05:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Prepelos! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 699 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Mark Jackson (producer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miami Band

The article Miami Band has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find sufficient evidence of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 22:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:EmilyOsment-I dont think.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:EmilyOsment-I dont think.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]