User talk:Qrt121

This is Qrt121's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: RitaWorld Inc. (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Femkemilene were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please try to write the majority of the article based on secondary sources. There are a couple of paragraphs that are .. odd .. like "Tree of Life"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RitaWorld Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:RitaWorld Inc., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Femke (talk) 21:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qrt121! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Femke (talk) 21:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Can you help me highlight the problem areas.

"Please try to write the majority of the article based on secondary sources. There are a couple of paragraphs that are .. odd .. like "Tree of Life"" Qrt121 (talk) 01:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello Qrt121. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:RitaWorld Inc., gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Qrt121. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Qrt121|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Femke (talk) 07:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Qrt121: Before you continue editing Draft:RitaWorld Inc., you must comply with any disclosure of paid editing or other connections to the company you are writing about. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:46, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:RitaWorld Inc.

Hello, Qrt121. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:RitaWorld Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: RitaWorld Inc. (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources used are not reliable (blogs, their website, social media, Medium, etc.) and/or not independent. Also, need in-depth coverage outside of the Atlanta area (see WP:AUD). Please also address Paid concerns.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RitaWorld Inc. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Where you said, "Most of the sources used are not reliable (blogs, their website, social media, Medium, etc.) and/or not independent. Also, need in-depth coverage outside of the Atlanta area (see WP:AUD). Please also address Paid concerns."

Can you pinpoint areas that this was an issue? Qrt121 (talk) 10:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:RitaWorld Inc.

Hello, Qrt121. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RitaWorld Inc.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:RitaWorld Inc.

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:RitaWorld Inc. has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:15, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qrt121,

As far as I can tell, this entire article was a hoax about a company that doesn't do anything it states it does. Wikipedia is not a place to get publicity for your pie-in-the-sky dreams and plans. We deal with reliable sources that provide significant coverage that demonstrate notability.

If you have questions about any of these policies, head to the Teahouse where experienced editors can offer you advice and support. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Qrt121/sandbox

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:Qrt121/sandbox, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]