User talk:Randhwasingh

Welcome!

Hello, Randhwasingh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -தமிழ்க்குரிசில் (talk) 17:35, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SRK edits

Please do not try to add an essay about his religious views to the article. The pertinent information is there already. This is not a place for long opinions, even from the subject himself. I am preparing this article for WP:FAC, and it needs to not have excessive length or controversial topics. BollyJeff | talk 15:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pro-India sentiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ajanabee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pro-India sentiment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pro-India sentiment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-India sentiment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – nafSadh did say 08:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Poorva Neeraj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poorva Neeraj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poorva Neeraj until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bhumi Pednekar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhumi Pednekar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhumi Pednekar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 19:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bhumi Pednekar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bhumi Pednekar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 18:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Natalia Kapchuk

The article Natalia Kapchuk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actress

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 18:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pankhuri Awasthy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pankhuri Awasthy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pankhuri Awasthy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 18:07, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh

It is a false info which you added in the page amaravati. The name is amaravati but the village is not the capital. Both are different.--Vin09 (talk) 10:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mehr Tarar

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mehr Tarar, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wikigrain.org/?req=Mehr+Tarar.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:29, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ājīvika, Carvaka and more Reply

I have reverted your edit on Ājīvika because the Carvakas were by definition a heterodox philosophy of atheist materialism. There is discussion on this topic on the talk page. Ogress _smash! 21:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Dear Randhwasingh, Can you please make an effort to provide full citation information when you add references? The source (newspaper, book + publisher) and date are clearly needed for us to assess the quality of the citation. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 10:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

I'm alerting you because of your recent edits at Indus Valley Civilization. "Discretionary sanctions" means that editors have to be extra carefull when editing articles for which "discretionary sanctions" are applied. They are applied to articles and topics which are often hotly debated, and easily invoke edit-wars. So far, three editors have made clear that your interpretation of the Harappan timeline is considered as POV-pushing; yet, you continue to push back the dates of the Harappan civilisation. This may end in a request to block you temporarily on this topic. So, please take care, and try to reach WP:CONCENSUS on this topic, and if that's not possible, just accept it. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of sources

Was this really the best reference you could find for Sania Mirza being ranked number 1 in doubles?! While there is arguably no rule against your edit, please exercise better editorial judgment especially when editing WP:BLPs. Abecedare (talk) 21:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the above principle also applies to history related article (I hadn't realized that you were the editor I had communicated before at Talk:Indus Valley Civilization, otherwise I would have mentioned it in the above note). Please take a look at WP:HISTRS on the preferred sources, and don't add redundant low-quality newspapers articles as sources indiscriminately. Abecedare (talk) 21:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at India. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mehr Tarar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mehr Tarar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Crow^Caw 18:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen‎

Thanks for your recent edits on the page but do provide edit summary to your edits so that other users will quickly get idea about what you are adding. Thank you. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 10:17, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Operation Golden Bird

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Randhwasingh, thanks for creating Operation Golden Bird!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. In the background section.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 00:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use of edit summaries

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Main Hoon Rajinikanth a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. I undid your cut'n'paste and performed an actual page-move. This may have lost some of the latest edits you made to the article content...please check and re-do them as necessary. DMacks (talk) 05:33, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Baahubali

I think it is best that we create an article called Production of Baahubali and store production information on both the films there, as it will help reduce the articles' lengths. Do you support this decision? Kailash29792 (talk) 17:34, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, Both are two films releasing in two different year. You can see films like Gangs of Wasseypur – Part 1 and Gangs of Wasseypur – Part 2 etc.--Randhwasingh (talk) 17:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see if you can empty the lead of references. But the same content must be sourced in the body of the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:31, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide your comment on the talk page about including information of the budget in the infobox. Marchoctober (talk) 17:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Harshita Gaur

A tag has been placed on Harshita Gaur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:00, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the I (film) page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Baahubali: The Conclusion

Hello Randhwasingh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Baahubali: The Conclusion for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mr RD (talk) 16:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Assee Nabbe Poore Sau.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Assee Nabbe Poore Sau.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to India does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! bojo1498 talk 19:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Jammu and Kashmir. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Aurangzeb, you may be blocked from editing. This kind of edit is highly concerning [1], because you invented terms like "mass murderer" which are nowhere to be found in the source. Please be aware that ARBIPA sanctions apply to these pages. I hope you won't repeat such prejudicial edits again. Kautilya3 (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Randhwasingh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shaheen Banu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaheen Banu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaheen Banu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 22:18, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Operation Golden Bird for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Golden Bird is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Golden Bird until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 07:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]