Jump to content

User talk:Ravichandar84/Archive 29

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Removals

[edit]

Hi Ravichandar84. In this edit, you removed some "unnecessary links". You also removed 3 portals.

I thought an article always benefited from at least one portal, which should go into a 'See also' section. I also thought that the links were relevant, and filled in white space in that section.

May I ask you what harm you thought the portals and links were doing?

Please reply here, and I'll watch out for it. Thanks, Trafford09 (talk) 02:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, you might notice that there are over 7,000 articles under Wikiproject Tamil Nadu. This being the case, I don't understand why you chose to add Tamil Nadu and Tamil people to the article on Chetan (actor). AFYKI, as there are thousands of television actors from Tamil Nadu. So, unless, there is a specific need to identify himself exclusively as a Tamilian through such portal links or "See Also" why should they be added there in the first place. And by the way, WP:MOS does not lie any stress on filling white spaces. Regards-The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 02:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

[edit]
[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Avestanalph.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:34, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

[edit]

Thanks for the talk @ MIT for10Wiki

[edit]

Thanks very much, indeed for your effortless, elaborate and informative discourse about Wikipedia. Keep up the good work in English Wiki. Come, visit Tamil Wikipedia, Tamil Wiktionary and contribute.--பரிதிமதி (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My mobile no. - 9444517552 --பரிதிமதி (talk) 08:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

[edit]

Trichy

[edit]

I have copy edited the article. But references needs further verification as first sentence in Education section has 7 references ( most of them are superfluous. You may like to have a look at all the references. --Nvvchar. 09:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Yes, I am doing a bit on this article. It still need sections on Arts and Crafts, Landmark places and Urban Planning, which you may like to add.--Nvvchar. 06:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

[edit]

This is me "hari7478" requesting for help: Please help in the "Iyengar" page.

[edit]

Hello. Please include the Iyengar page in your watch list, and please check the article’s contents, whenever you log in to wiki’. Actually there had been an edit warring in that page, due to which the page is fully protected for two weeks. The protection expires on MARCH 2nd (Wednesday). The once disputed section in the Iyengar page was Ethnicity, Genetics and Origin. ; especially the sub-section that was disputed was “Thenkalai Iyengar” under that section. The contents under the section Ethnicity Genetics and Origin are the same as found in the individual Vadakalai and Thenkalai pages. I guess you must have seen and reviewed the contents under the section “Ethnicity and Origin”, in both the “Vadakalai” and “Thenkalai” wiki’ pages. All of them have valid sourcing. The same has been uploaded ,collectively together, in the main Iyengar page too(for the past 7 months). Presently, as of today, the article(under full protection) is fine, but after the protection period is over, a user(user:ramanujamuni) will start making vandalising edits. This user has been making unconventional edits due to which an edit warring had started. Hence the page is under full protection. I request you to please check for the integrity of the Iyengar page frequently, and revert any vandalising edits. Please read further below.

The edit warring had started due to conflicting edits from a user “user-ramanujamuni”. I guess this user (“ramanujamuni”) is a thenkalai iyengar, who is very uncomfortable with the data “Thenkalai are believed to have admixed with non-brahmins”, etc. The user “ramanujamuni” was constantly deleting those contents , and was contributing irrelevant data without providing any source. That user “ramanujamuni” is actually a one tick pony, who had newly come to wiki’ ,for editing in the iyengar page only. He started with an all out warring. That user is very new to wiki’, and does not understand wiki’ policy of “Verifiability ,not Truth” . The user “ramanujamuni” has been making vandalising edits, till the page was put under full protection. He had been violating all basic policies of wiki’. That user had also falesly accused me(everywhere) in unconventional ways. The user accused me falsely, of maliging thenkalai sampradaya, npov dispution etc. I never maligned any sampradaya, and there are no malicious terms in the page. The iyengar page is clean(as of now-present revision) and the sensitive contents , have valid sources and addintional sources for cross checking. “User-Ramanujamuni” also constantly rejected the authority of source materials , and had been deleting the sources I provided, because the data was not agreeable to him.

I request you to please include the Iyengar page in your watch list, and please check it frequently for vandalising edits. Also if there are inconsistencies in my edits, please make the changes. But I repeat, my contrib’s in the page, under the section “Ethnicity, Genetics and Origin” are the same as found in the individual “Vadakalai” and “Thenkalai” pages . I’m sure you had seen them. But “user-ramanujamuni” was removing valid contents from the “thenkalai iyengar sub-section, under the corresponding section” in the iyengar page. Presently, as of today(Feb’ 27 2011) , the page is under protection, and the present version(revision) is just fine. See here : [1].
But after the protection period expires, I’m afraid that user will come back to the picture again. So I request you; please check frequently, for the contents in the Iyengar page. The article has been lacking a good experienced editor, for more than a year. Thank You. Hari7478 (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ravichandar84. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

[edit]

Hey

[edit]

Hey Ravi, it's been a long time since we interacted. How's life and wiki and all? Hope to see you soon. Maybe at a meetup this year.

--Regards, --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:39, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

[edit]

Munro photo

[edit]

As i expected Ravages has an excellent photo of thomas munro here. If you want to ask him for a non commercial CC release permission, ask him. If you dont want to do the honors :-), i will ask him--Sodabottle (talk) 12:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

[edit]

Koothanallur

[edit]

Hi Ravi, I have unprotected the article. — Ganeshk (talk) 11:58, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ravichandar84/Archive_29&oldid=1143861088"