Jump to content

User talk:RobinClay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Hello RobinClay and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have not already created a account here, note that you do not have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...



--Bduke (Discussion) 02:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you put a thank you message to me in the article William Hale Hale. While I appreciate it, we have talk pages for that purpose. You can respond here, on your talk page, or on my talk page, which is located here >>> User_talk:-Zeus-. (or click on my name in my signature, >>>) Cheers, -Zeus-u|c 04:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Thank you !

[edit]

As a WikiNovice, I have only just discovered this "Page" ! Thank you so much, Zeus, for your help. It is much appreciated. "Happiness is doing good by stealth and it being discovered by accident" - you should be very happy ! RobinClay (talk) 20:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting

[edit]

Just add your name to the list here. There is nothing formal about it. You just participate where you can. Regards, --Bduke (Discussion) 06:50, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You added the "Title" section to this page a while ago, which was tagged as OR. I moved it to the talkpage with a query in January: I notice that shortly afterwards you (a) replaced the section, without (b) addressing the issue on the talk page, or (c) adding a citation needed, or (d) explaining what you were doing in the edit summary.
I’ve replaced the OR Tag, but if you want to save this from being deleted, I suggest you come up with a reference to back up your assertion. Swanny18 (talk) 19:47, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're kidding, yes?
You’re offering a review you wrote yourself on Amazon as a reference?
I suggest you read this in WP:Reliable Sources (also WP:COI and WP:SELFCITING), before we go any further… Swanny18 (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on De Candole requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logan Talk Contributions 07:19, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Derbyshire Childhood

[edit]

Could you please make 'see "A Derbyshire Childhood"' into a proper reference? I have no idea what it refers to. --Bduke (Discussion) 00:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Craig Goch Dam, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/902833.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 21:50, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned this article up as it was copied/pasted from the source. Please be more careful next time and you have any questions, let me know.--NortyNort (Holla) 10:55, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One day my prints will come...

[edit]

I saw your note on Needwood Forest saying " I have the two prints referred to, and scans thereof (if only I knew how to upload them....)) ". I would like to help. Victuallers (talk) 09:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fine... or I'll show you to load them... it's your choice. If you want to try first then try clicking here and seeing it it makes sense to you (I know it is tricky)
Have a go here .... Victuallers (talk) 19:49, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but.... That link didn't work - it wanted me to log in (which I already was) and wouldn't accept my login  :( RobinClay (talk) 13:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Grand One-Hundred-Foot Canal, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 20:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Charlotte Mosley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 21:54, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:1938 Ileana 048 pic & sig 50%.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 05:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gone for a Burton

[edit]

Hello Robin and thank you for adding the interesting Spitfire story to Gone for a Burton. Is this material copied from http://spitfiresite.com/2012/01/modification-xxx-beer-carrying-spitfires.html or a similar source? If so then unfortunately their copyright policy does not allow it to be copied to Wikipedia. Also, it is unclear how the tale relates to the phrase Gone for a Burton. For these reasons, I have removed it for the time being. If you can explain how it is relevant, you may want to add a short summary with a reference to the original source. There is some more detailed information about using copyrighted material in Wikipedia at WP:COPYOTHERS. Certes (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Taps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Girl Scout (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:RobinClay/Guides International Service has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guides International Service, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:44, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! RobinClay, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you'd like to drop by the Teahouse and discuss the article, the experienced hosts at the Teahouse would be glad to see if they can offer improvement suggestions... and that may lead to the article becoming accepted. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 13:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:RobinClay/Richard Luce, MP has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Luce, MP, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 00:31, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Richard Luce (MP), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 22:08, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

For medical articles it is important to use review articles or major textbooks as refs per WP:MEDRS. THanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of oldest universities in continuous operation

[edit]

Hi. If you're going to make changes at List of oldest universities in continuous operation then please format them properly; otherwise they are liable to be reverted as vandalism. If you want to start a discussion please use the talk page. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 09:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cherry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sweetheart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arthur Granville Soames requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Buggie111 (talk) 17:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've removed the tag. I completely missed the OBe, which makes the guy notable. Do try to tidy it up a bit into paragraph(s), though. Buggie111 (talk) 18:50, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Granville Soames, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sheffield Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Wilkins (priest), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Harley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:1937 Ileana 045 pic & sig.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:1937 Ileana 045 pic & sig.jpg, which you've sourced to Betty Clay's Album. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LGA (was LightGreenApple) talk to me 01:44, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, RobinClay. You have new messages at LGA's talk page.
Message added 01:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

LGA (was LightGreenApple) talk to me 01:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited HMS Scylla (1809), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hydrographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anthony Alfred Bowlby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability (baronets aren't notable per se, I believe).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 17:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Henry Bowlby

[edit]

Is Thomas Henry Bowlby an accidental mistitled duplicate of Henry Thomas Bowlby? If so, the tidiest thing to do would be to add {{db-self}} to ask for it to be deleted. Thanks. PamD 17:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas Henry Bowlby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. STATic message me! 01:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Thomas Bowlby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charterhouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guides International Service, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Philip James Macdonell has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. I am a violinisttalk to me here! 12:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined The gentleman died in 1940/41Fiddle Faddle 13:36, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PJM - the route forward

[edit]

This looks like a great find. I'm not sure what to do with the personal papers you have referred to elsewhere. It is allowed to scan them and upload them here, but, and this is important that means that they are released for ever into the wild. Think hard before you do that.

You may find that editing here is addictive, but read this essay before you get carried away. Above all we need full citations. The freeBMD site is interesting, but you must quote the record, not the FreeBMD url itself. Use it to find what you seek and then quote the source document. Be aware that such items are primary sources. Items like the Montreal Gazette quote his death as January 1941, for example, and are at variance with the death date stated in the article, and the presidency of the Balovale Commission Fiddle Faddle 13:36, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for your input. I have a VAST amount of "stuff" inherited from my parents, which I am trying to scan and distribute as fast as I can[1]. I don't CARE about seeking references / citations for the stuff I put up! Someone else can do that - I've got "better" things to do, that only I can! But first... I have to re-install the en-suite I stripped out 18 months ago... RobinClay (talk) 13:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I DID give the Vol & page numbers from the FreeBMD refs. RobinClay (talk) 14:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Alan Wheeler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Samwalton9 (talk) 22:51, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dick Ubee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Samwalton9 (talk) 22:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Alan Hards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Samwalton9 (talk) 22:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Allen Wheeler, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Alan Wheeler. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 11:31, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the content of of this edit to talk:William Sydenham I have explained why there. It is because the text is not supported by reliable sources and so is original research which can not be published on Wikipedia (see WP:OR).

BTW did you realise there was a William Sydenham who flourished shortly after this William Sydenham. He was an Esquire to the Body William III (from 1692 until 1702), so any research into descendants needs to check which WS they are descended from (for all I know the younger one could be a relation of the Commewealth-man). -- PBS (talk) 17:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eric Brown (pilot) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Joe Smith and John Cunningham
Sydney Richard Ubee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to National Portrait Gallery and Eric Brown
Allen Wheeler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Eric Brown
Baden Powell (politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mildenhall

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mpika, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kasama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References for Alan James Scott

[edit]

Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Alan James Scott are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Noah's Ark

[edit]

I removed the content you added to Noah's Ark I don't think it belongs in the article which covers an account of the Genesis story, the searches are covered in the article Searches for Noah's Ark Theroadislong (talk) 17:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Anna Marten (December 28)

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Witwatersrand Native Labour Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Mary Anna Marten was accepted

[edit]
Mary Anna Marten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~~ Sintaku Talk 18:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Many thanks for your edit to the reserve fleet article. Do you have a source for the section about Croker cutting the navy by 1,000 ships? Dormskirk (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My "interest" in the subject is purely because I am currently proof-reading a proposed book on the subject ! So, No; at the moment I can't. But when the book is published....RobinClay (talk) 23:51, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I look forward to hearing about the book once it has been published. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 20:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Operation Market Garden may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • B. MacDonald, ''The Mighty Endeavor; American Armed Forces in the European Theater in World War II,)'' (New York, 1969)</ref>{{Page needed|date=October 2012}} Other important ports on the [[English
  • In 2008 the soloist was a 13-year-old Dutch girl, [[Melissa Venema[[, backed by [[André Rieu]] and the [[Royal Orchestra of the Netherlands]].<ref name="Zaankanter">{{

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Market Garden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Il Silenzio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dorset Wildlife Trust may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [Isle of Purbeck|Purbeck]] Marine Wildlife Reserve,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:56, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brownsea

[edit]

Hi Robin, thank you for adding to Brownsea Island Scout camp. Please understand that it is a featured article with high standards, including the appearance of references. "Bare url" is not acceptable, can you please follow the example of other references there. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:51, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Gerda - I don't understand. If you don't like what I have put, feel free to change it. ... RobinClay (talk) 15:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's not like or not like, it's a formatting of the references, and the references have to be reliable. I suggest you propose what you want to add on the talk page. "bare url" means just a link, whereas author, title, publisher, date or accessdate are minimum requirements. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was tired and short. Trying again. Faetured articles are carefully checked for criteria, changes to them should follow the same criteria, if in doubt, use the talk page. You introduced interesting information, however based on a source that is not considered "reliable", because it's collection with no exact source given for the individual facts. They are probably all true, but unfortunately that is not the question in Wikipedia, the (slightly different) question is if it can be verified.
The bare url you used is http://www.thescoutingpages.org.uk/first_camp.html
If we format it to the way the article uses we get to <ref name="scouting">{{cite web | last = Gowan | first = Douglas | url = http://www.thescoutingpages.org.uk/first_camp.html | title = The Brownsea Island Camp / The First Camp | publisher = thescoutingpages.org | accessdate = 10 July 2014}}</ref> which would look like this:
Gowan, Douglas. "The Brownsea Island Camp / The First Camp". thescoutingpages.org. Retrieved 10 July 2014.
Remember that this FA is 7 years old, - today the same main author would do it differently, look at Kafka. I think that your approach to enter information to the Brownsea article is a good solution. Another would be to dig into Gowan's sources and find the individual source for a fact such as the boy's names. Feel free to ask, here or on the article talk page. Our secret goal is to have the article ready to appear on the Main page in 2017. Your help is appreciated! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for tweaking it. I have FAR more "important" (to me) things to do than try to learn all the nuances of what you mention (which I really don't understand - nor do I particularly want to, Sorry !) Wikipedia's "rule" is "Be bold". I put the stuff up. If you (or anybody) is not happy with the "presentation", that is their problem, not mine. The whole point of editing a Wikipedia article is to "improve" it. This can be done by adding to it - as I have done - OR by tweaking it the way you have done. Simply "reverting" is (a) extremely rude; and (b) does not "improve" the article. It actually detracts from it.
As an example, my mother unveiled the Stone on Brownsea. I checked the date in her diary. What "reference" could I give for that ??? Well, what I did was to transcribe her diary entry, post it on one of my WebSites and then use that as the "reference". But I have 70 of her page-a-day diaries. Yes; my aim is to transcribe them all and make them available. I also have 30 of her (400 x 270 x 65) albums; and 40 years of family correspondence (3 slightly different copies of each), etc., etc., etc.....RobinClay (talk) 12:24, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I like to meet another one who records memories on Wikipedia ;) - Can we please be patient with each other, all involved, and head for 2017 with the article in question? FA standards are high, much higher now than back in 2007, and some of us (including my friend Montanabw) are afraid that the article might loose its classification due to that, not because of you. Reverting is not meant to be rude, just cautious. I will have more time next week. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the bust and footprint. Please either change the order or explain B-P the first time, and format that reference as described above. I trust that you are able to follow the example and don't need someone to clean up, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:28, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Princess Sibylla + child 020.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Sibylla + child 020.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LGA talkedits 08:29, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Princess Sibylla & Gustav Adolf 022b.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Sibylla & Gustav Adolf 022b.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LGA talkedits 08:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to SS Calgaric may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • JTLW<br />{{ICS|Juliet}}{{ICS|Tango}}{{ICS|Lima}}{{ICS|Whiskey}}<!--br />Radio callsign "???"-->
  • the participants. There were 85 men and 570 women - some of the [[Wolf Cub]] [[Akela]]s were women).<ref>http://scoutguidehistoricalsociety.com/calgaric.htm</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

SS Calgaric
added links pointing to Wolf Cub and Akela
Robert Baden-Powell, 1st Baron Baden-Powell
added a link pointing to Crystal Palace

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Donald Ferlys Wilson Baden-Powell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and thence to [[Christiania]] (now [[Oslo]]) by 9pm on 29 Aug, 1912. ''""Put up at the Grand Hotel (in mistake for the one I wanted, the Victoria."'' They visited two 1100-year-old Viking ships,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:51, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Francis Robert Baden-Powell

[edit]

Hello RobinClay,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Francis Robert Baden-Powell for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Asdklf; (talk) 22:03, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donald Ferlys Wilson Baden-Powell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christiania. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flight of the Norwegian National Treasury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page S.O.E.. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RMS Adriatic (1906), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Villefranche. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shannon Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Great North Road, Zambia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • the opening of the [[Chirundu Bridge]] - before that, the Great North Road ran through [Bulawayo]] and [[Livingstone, Zambia]] to Lusaka. The portion from Mbala to Mupulungu could be regarded as a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Patrice Lumumba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 16:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Beresford-Stooke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crown Agent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden Rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Water Babies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Derek Coombs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Queen's South Africa Medal

[edit]

Your repeated deletion of a paragraph in Queen's South Africa Medal is unacceptable. I am reverting your edit once again since the paragraph you keep on removing is just as much part of the war as the preceding paragraph about the difficulties experienced by the invading British forces. The concentration camps, arguably the most significant and contentious British strategy of the war, and the issues raised about them by Emily Hobhouse and others like Lloyd-George, all took place in 1901 while the war only ended on 31 May 1902. The paragraph is therefore not about events AFTER the War like you seem to believe. True, the article is about the campaign medal, but the war is what the medal was awarded for and a brief mention about the applicable campaign is therefore not inappropriate.
See, for example, South Africa Medal (1854), South Africa Medal (1880) and Natal Native Rebellion Medal.
Furthermore, section headings should not contain wikilinks. -- André Kritzinger (talk) 15:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stella Lonsdale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JustBerry (talk) 22:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    • Thank you. However... I do not have any more time to spend on that, nor inclination. My interest was roused because her name appears on the Deeds of our house, which once formed part of the Pitt-Rivers Estate. It was sold in 1966; we bought it five years ago. If The Wikipedia Gestapo wish to delete it, so be it. I've done my bit ! I have FAR too much of my own family "stuff" to deal with ! Thanks again. RobinClay (talk) 10:57, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting

[edit]

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license.

I like you contribution [1], but it must be paraphrased from [2]. Any why did you reference facebook?--Lucas559 (talk) 17:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting, part deux

[edit]

Hi, RobinClay. I have reverted two of your edits from 2014. You seem to have copy pasted this and this from unnamed source to Il Silenzio (song) and Operation Market Garden. Why would you do that? Politrukki (talk) 15:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, well done for creating the article on Ferry Bridge, nice work. I moved the link in the River Trent article to the para discussing the bridge a bit further down (with an extra link to the image). Happy editing (I will watch here for any reply)...Jokulhlaup (talk) 16:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Had me worried, there ! No I did NOT create the article on Ferry Bridge Burton ;-) I merely visited it, and added a fair bit, and then sought references to that page elsewhere in Wikipedia; finding none, I thought I should add a few - but in that River Trent article to which I now discover you actually refer, I did not go any further down, so failed to spot the reference already there, but not bracketted. Thank you for wot U dun.  ;-) --RobinClay (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I should have checked the bridge article more closely - I thought it had just been created. Thanks for the link anyway :) Jokulhlaup (talk) 17:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, RobinClay. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Komboni for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Komboni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Komboni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nördic Nightfury 14:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marimba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rausch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, RobinClay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Northern Rhodesia Journal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not seeing anything to indicate notability. yes it existed but thats about it

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User pages

[edit]

Do not edit someone else's user page as you did with User:Fayenatic london per WP:NOBAN. — JudeccaXIII (talk) 03:55, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Roberts, 1st Earl Roberts

[edit]

Hi - Please can you read WP:CITE and ensure all your edits are properly cited - especially in the case of articles that have already been independently assessed for quality. Thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 22:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ernest Lemon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LMS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, RobinClay. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

concern

[edit]

Information icon Hello, RobinClay. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It is a dicey question sometimes on when Conflict of Interest applies. I (as oppose to the Wikipedia 'we') know several people with articles and am relatively closely related to several more with articles. My rule of thumb now is to discuss possibly controversial edits in the talk pages even for some fairly distant relatives [and this includes some from the 1700s] and allow others to make the edits. --Erp (talk) 04:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Baden-Powell

[edit]

Hello RobinClay,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged David Baden-Powell for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to History of rail transport

[edit]

Hi RobinClay,

I have reverted your recent edit to History of rail transport as it contains several significant errors. I was surprised when I looked ta your contribution history to see you have been editing on Wikipedia for more than a decade. I say surprised because you made some extremely basic errors. The most glaring was you were linking to other articles using the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Zambia] form. The right way to link to that Wikipedia article is: [[History of rail transport in Zambia]]. Some of them you just left as bare links like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_rail_transport_in_Zambia; that's particularly egregious.

You should also not leave comments like "These headings are in anticipation of further information being added shortly, collecting together existing Wikipedia articles.." in articles. You do not need to leave instructions on editing in the article itself; articles are for subject content only. Then you linked to History of rail transport in Zambia in the section for Botswana - they are separate countries. And youn linked to History of rail transport in Zambia in the section for Zimbabwe! Your edits were also entirely unsourced. After 11 years editing here, how do you not know that you need to source information you add to articles? I see you have been repeatedly asked to cite sources. Why are you still adding unsourced material to articles?

There is a rule that competency is required to edit Wikipedia. Please take a moment to refresh your understanding of the basic policies and guidelines for editing. There is a good guide at the top of this page - left for you in 2009. Thanks, The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:47, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 01:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katrine de Candole for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katrine de Candole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katrine de Candole until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•AC) This message was left at 22:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2021

[edit]
WikiProject Scouting | May 2021


Notes for May:

  • Congratulations to our Barnstar awardees!
  • Interested in coordinating a zoom meeting? Please let us know.


Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2021

[edit]
WikiProject Scouting | July 2021


Things to watch for:


Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Rail transport in Botswana. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:45, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RAF Castel Benito, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Leopoldville and Kano. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brownsea Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tipperary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: October 2021

[edit]
WikiProject Scouting | October 2021

It is with sadness that we note the passing of Jim Howes. Throughout his life, Jim worked to make the world a better place. WikiProject Scouting now has no administrators listed as willing to help the WikiProject. If you are an administrator and are willing to help, please let us know here.

Things to watch for:


Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) 15:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2022

[edit]
WikiProject Scouting | May 2022


Notes for May:

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk)

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article The Cavalry Controversy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This should at best be a brief mention in the Cavalry tactics article or in Cavalry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, RobinClay

Thank you for creating Henry Toynbee.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs more sources. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2022

[edit]
WikiProject Scouting | June 2022


Notes for June:

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) 22:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: August 2022

[edit]
WikiProject Scouting | August 2022


Notes for August:

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) August 1, 2022



Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: January 2023

[edit]
WikiProject Scouting | January 2023


Notes for January:

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) January 16, 2023

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Notice

The article John Abbot (ca 1381-1444) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources. Footnotes only elaborate on content of the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Abbot (ca 1381-1444) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, John Abbot (ca 1381-1444), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ingratis (talk) 18:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: as above, the article is not acceptable in its present state without sources, but this man was apparently an MP and as such would be notable under WP:NPOL, so rather than letting it be deleted straight away I thought it worth moving it to draft to allow time for sources to be gathered and added. Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 18:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: March 2023

[edit]
WikiProject Scouting | March 2023


Notes for March:

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) March 16, 2023

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: July 2023

[edit]
WikiProject Scouting | July 2023


Notes for July
  • On our To do list, we need to prioritize some tasks for articles outside of the US or the UK.
Announcements for the benefit of all
Other ways to participate

--evrik (talk)



Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 16:41, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, RobinClay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Abbot (ca 1381-1444), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RobinClay. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Abbot".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:16, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Matabele War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charterhouse.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mothering Sunday, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 15:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting Newsletter: May 2024

[edit]
WikiProject Scouting | May 2024


Notes for May:

Some important articles that need help: The Scout Association, NAYLE, Philmont Training Center, BSA Leadership Training, COPE

Other ways to participate:

--evrik (talk) May 22, 2024

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edith Cavell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RobinClay, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, David Baden-Powell, 5th Baron of Gilwell, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Baden-Powell, 5th Baron of Gilwell.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 14:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:HMS Tyne (F24)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, RobinClay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:HMS Tyne (F24), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, David Baden-Powell, 5th Baron Baden-Powell. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – David Baden-Powell, 5th Baron of Gilwell. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at David Baden-Powell, 5th Baron of Gilwell. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. AusLondonder (talk) 18:42, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]