User talk:SDavies

Welcome!

Hello, SDavies, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Just in case you emerge again - a very delayed welcome... Satu Suro 08:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wikiprojects

Hi. I notice you contributed to the Gordon Stephens article, amongst other cool things, so I thought you might be interested in these projects;

Wikipedia:WikiProject Perth and Wikipedia:WikiProject Western Australia.

I hope to see you pop up on my watchlist again. Regards, cygnis insignis 08:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of shipwrecks of Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lively. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

adding to list of shipwrecks of oz

you might see the items listed are to blue linked completed articles about the misadventure - it would help to keep the convention going, and you might get queried about that... thanks for adding items - please understand the wa level might be more appropriate where there is not yet an article about the ship/shipwreck... thanks JarrahTree 09:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JarrahTree yes it did occur to me after that edit that Jon Jim might not qualify as a 'significant' wreck. I'll try to be judicious when considering adding further items.SDavies (talk) 13:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Judicious? = need to have a sense of balance as to whether you can create an article about a wreck - and with sufficient material that passes notability as opposed to significance - (semantics) - and then it is a viable item (most wrecks in wa that have material about the ship and the wrecking can be deemed notable) - despite the vast amounts of info in databases and textual materials that relate to wrecks - very few have been written up on wikipedia). JarrahTree 23:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]