User talk:Sbshuvo

Deletion discussion about Nithor Mahbub

Hello, Sbshuvo,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Nithor Mahbub should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nithor Mahbub .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 16:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello Crystallizedcarbon,

Nithor Mahbub is an risen Mime Star of Bangladesh. Please let me know how to prove it. You can search on google with "Mime Nithor", hope you will a lot of evidence.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from Nithor Mahbub, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:55, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Nithor Mahbub. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 21:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Nithor Mahbub. Please make your case on the page's talk page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 21:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Mime Art Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mime Art Logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:46, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shahajahan Badshah Shuvo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shahajahan Badshah Shuvo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MT Train^Talk 11:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Shahajahan Badshah Shuvo. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself

Welcome to Wikipedia, but it is not a place like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography.

The links in the Welcome message at the top of this page will tell you more about Wikipedia.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shahajahan Badshah Shuvo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahajahan Badshah Shuvo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahajahan Badshah Shuvo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MT Train^Talk 12:51, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Shahajahan Badshah Shuvo. StewdioMACK (talk) 13:38, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbshuvo: Your talk page makes interesting reading. Have you read WP:COI? Tayste (edits) 20:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erwin Mahroug for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erwin Mahroug is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erwin Mahroug until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KingAndGod 09:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bboyworld for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bboyworld is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bboyworld until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KingAndGod 09:37, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Your addition to Nino Kader has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nino Kader

I moved the comment you left at Talk:Nino Kader to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nino Kader, which is where the discussion is taking place about possibly deleting the article. You may wish to go to that page and address the concerns of the other editors. --Nat Gertler (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid editing

Hello Sbshuvo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sbshuvo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sbshuvo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 12:48, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

The article on Nino Kader was deleted after a deletion discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nino Kader (in which you participated, so I'm a bit surprised about your question). --Randykitty (talk) 08:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Randykitty:: He had not posted directly to that page; his comment that was on there had been placed on the article talk page. As it appeared to address the deletion request that was already ongoing, I copied it over to the deletion discussion and notified him on this-here talk page. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:58, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see, thanks for the clarification NatGertler. But the main point that Sbshuvo was aware of this AfD remains. --Randykitty (talk) 14:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mime Art

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mime Art, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BBoyWorld

Please do not circumvent community deletion decisions by re-creating the same article and just changing a few capitals, as you did with BBoyWorld and Bboyworld. This is considered disruptive and may get you blocked from editing. If you have new information (in the form of in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources) showing notability, then you can create a new version of the article as a draft and submit it through the AFC process. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 13:49, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Refactored signature

Hello SB Shuvo / Sbshuvo. I wanted to let you know that I refactored your signature at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Moorfield. Normally editors should not change other editors' talk or deletion comments, so I wanted to explain why I did that. It seems as though you typed your signature rather than using ~~~~ to automatically add your user name and the date. As a result, I couldn't easily find your User talk page or your contributions. I changed your signature line to it's current form, [[User talk:Sbshuvo|SB Shuvo]] 20:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC), so that anyone who clicks on "SB Shuvo" will be linked to this user talk page. My apologies if this troubles you in any way. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 02:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop attempting to delete articles

Listing articles at AfD for spurious reasons is disruptive editing. You have done this twice in a row despite being informed that your previous AfD was wrong. If you continue to do this, you will likely be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Natureium (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Natureium, could you please list those AfDs? I'm asking because I applied the snowball clause at the John Moorfield AfD because it was so obviously wrong. I thought that was getting close to disruptive editing but if this is part of a pattern then my concerns are heightened. Schwede 66 20:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Schwede66, That was the first (that I noticed) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Raworth was the second. I'm not even sure what this is. Natureium (talk) 20:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like continue making disruptive deletion requests. The Karl Kjer article is already at AfD. Attempting to PROD it is, at best, pointless. Please stop this, or you'll end up being blocked from editing! Favonian (talk) 15:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Debadrita Basu.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Debadrita Basu.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KH-1 (talk) 01:38, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Digital marketing. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Kuru (talk) 00:34, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Debadrita Basu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Example. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:23, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hosa Prem, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Playback and True Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lavi Beats

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lavi Beats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 04:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lavi Hoss, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 21:14, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lavi Hoss

The article Lavi Hoss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial sources. "References" are single line mentions or listings. Appears to fail WP:NOTMUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 21:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lavi Hoss for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lavi Hoss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lavi Hoss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 14:23, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lavi Beats.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Lavi Beats.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://lavibeats.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lavi Hoss

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lavi Hoss, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://lavibeats.com. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 14:31, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

You need to know that Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the plot section of the article Hosa Prem. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is subject to copyright, as is almost everything on the web, and when creating or expanding articles, you should completely rewrite the information from the source using your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:33, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arrivedo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arrivedo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Joe (talk) 05:51, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Accpick

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Accpick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 05:36, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

Hello! You have created a number of pages and files that have been deleted over the last several months. It seems you have also been warned a few different times about your editing behavior. All that to say, this appears to be a pattern of either disruptive editing or perhaps not getting the point. If you continue to edit in a way that creates a mess for others to clean up, you will be blocked. Please ask for help if you need it. Thanks. Killiondude (talk) 22:32, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sbshuvo, I've got your page on my watchlist because I share those concerns. My patience is running out; things better change quickly at your end. Schwede 66 07:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SChwede66, Hello Sir, Thanks for your concern to me. I have tried a lot to submit my article according to wiki criteria. I am hopeless. I want to post another page to see your review as I do any mistake anywhere on the page. Will you please show me a way to check a post before publishing whether any wrong? I will be happy and grateful. Hope my hope to be a successful wikipedian won't be doomed. I have changed a lot on those article which are been deleted. Now Please halp me. Sbshuvo (talk) 07:36, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you use the WP:article wizard. Schwede 66 20:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Sir Schwede66 , I am trying this feature from now on. Sbshuvo (talk) 23:29, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SmartSE (talk) 13:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your claims to not being paid to edit here are not credible. SmartSE (talk) 13:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, SmartSE May I know where I am advertising myself or How I am being paid ? You know I am going to think myself as a devoted volunteer. Even last day I have tried to donate money for wikipedia? Though I failed, I send wiki a screenshot of my email. They replied too. My last edited photo was moved because there a problem with size. Is that problem? If you unblock me I will refrain myself from doing anything wrong. Please think once. Let me have a chance. I will not do that again. Regards.Sbshuvo (talk) 14:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Predominantly the content you've been creating, combined with offers on social media to create articles. I can't be sure you are being paid, but I consider this far more likely than your claim not to be. SmartSE (talk) 14:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May You please consider once more?I was not paid for creating any page. I will filter my problems. Please do this favor. My dream can not be doomed. Please think once more. Sbshuvo (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't have blocked you if you asking me to reconsider would make a difference. If you wish to appeal, follow the instructions above. SmartSE (talk) 18:39, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbshuvo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Admin, SmartSE I understand what my fault was. I stand accused of my my fault and I am assuring that I will never write any article which looks like advertisement. I will never collect any profile from news portal or from other sources to let them get a place on wikipedia. Hope this confess will help me getting my account back again. Regards Sbshuvo (talk) 03:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

30 seconds on Google is enough to convince me that you are not telling the truth regarding your relationships with the subjects of the articles you've been creating. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:07, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, May you specify that Article? Thanks Sbshuvo (talk) 04:55, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just read all of the warnings above. The fact that you continued your disruptive behavior after the first few warnings is more than enough to justify blocking you. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:04, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Though I was not like that. I can prove it. Anyway, I confess, at least I should be informed my period of keeping me blocked. Thanks. Sbshuvo (talk) 05:10, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The period is indefinite. You had your chance to stop being disruptive after the first warning on this page, then again after the second warning, and so on. Find somewhere else to advertise. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:45, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gilro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gilro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 02:30, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nithor Mahbub for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nithor Mahbub is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nithor Mahbub (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sbshuvo, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Schwede 66 18:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

Can anyone please unblock me ? I want to contribute in wikipedia. Sbshuvo (talk) 19:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]