User talk:Shirt58/Archive 1
I'M RAHAT SADIQ and I had been done EFL from Oakland's and I had been done foundation Accountancy in LSBF from England
UA232, and the subjunctive
I'll have a look at the discrepancy you mention in the article on the plane crash.
Were I a more scholarly user of the language, I am sure I would agree with you on the subjunctive... (although I do enjoy using it in German, strangely enough). I suppose I think that it tends to lend a somewhat archaic feeling to the articles. Clarity demands simple sentences in a project like this which is used by many for whom (and that's a word whose misuse and overuse triggers similar feelings in me, by the way) English is not a mother tongue. Would that it were otherwise. Best wishes, --Guinnog 21:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- I have had a look at the UA 232 article and cannot see the discrepancies that you mention. Can you elucidate? --Guinnog 22:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- I have just read your comment in the aricle talk page, which perhaps I should have done before my last message. The speed of sound varies with altitude (or more correctly with air pressure, so temperature and humidity matter too, though less so. See Mach number for more details. --Guinnog 22:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- First of all, please read the article Hey, I majored in Philosophy! (excuse for anything). I be of the opinion, etc.
OK. Mach number varies with all those thingies, but '[a]t a temperature of 15 degrees Celsius, Mach 1 is 340.3 m·s-1 (1,225 km·h-1 or 761.2 mph)'. The aeroplane was travelling at '270 knots', and '1 knot = 1.000 nautical mile/hour = 1.852 km/h exactly'. This means it was travelling at 270 x 1.852 km/h, = 500.04 km/h. Are my calculations wrong here? If the aeroplane was flying through Dulce de leche rather than the atmosphere at 37,000 feet, the Mach number might be substantially different.
Ooops, gotta go. Billy Crystal is on Denton. Continue this later. --Shirt58 11:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- First of all, please read the article Hey, I majored in Philosophy! (excuse for anything). I be of the opinion, etc.
- 'Guinnog is taking a long wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia later in 2007, probably.'--Shirt58 14:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
GREETINGS
And Hello from Dallas, Texas! Thanks for bringing to my attention the updates in the Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Caris42 16:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
borebkole
Hi Shirt Nope, Never heard of this before. As you say I merely moved it into the article proper. borebkole is a DOG!! You reckon the Dutch eat DOG on Halloween (that's when we eat Colcannon). Maybe this is a hoax?! (Sarah777 16:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC))
I guess I guessed you didn't mean the Dutch eat Dog! Those Speculaas look yummy. I reckon if you suss out the borebkole recipe I'll have to make some and taste it! (Sarah777 13:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC))
Re:Jon/Joan/Jaun Elia
I think the transliteration used in the title should be used through out the article. Usage of multiple transliterations is a result of multiple ediors using their personal preferences. Szhaider 20:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- This, our little conversation, might have been a little model of how things could work. Szhaider's now blocked indefinitely. I pass nor seek no judgement. --Shirt58 13:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Et Tu, Shirt58
Well, I thank you, kind sir! Thanks also for making me aware of this doggy tale, one that obviously got away. I was in South America with some friends over Christmas, only returning home for the New Year with a zillion things to catch up on: and not so long after I got back I had to trot off to Bulgaria. It gets worse, because I will be spending most of February in Mexico City-sigh!!! In future if there is anything I can help you with just flag it up and I will do my best. Love. Clio the Muse 20:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- "Comic book collecting"? How insulting. I am none of fat, pony-tailed, bearded, four-fingered and self-employed.
Although, photographs of me with three weeks' worth of face fungus and and hair down to my shoulderblades do exist. And I did get a little plump for a couple of months a few times. And I do like Cat and Girl and Hate...
But both of my post-graduate thingies are very much professional qualifications... Worst. Multiple Career Changes. Ever.
Mmm... maybe I should try going into business by myself in ... something...--Shirt58 12:22, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- "Comic book collecting"? How insulting. I am none of fat, pony-tailed, bearded, four-fingered and self-employed.
- can I quote you on all that its funny! (my post grad thing was so obscure I never finished it, sigh ) SatuSuro 13:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- My common experience ( a very long time ago - probablly before 70% wikipedia editors born (ie before 1980)) was to drive between Hobart and Queenstown in the middle of the night to get back to work for the following am - usually never meeting a car between new norfolk and queenie at all.... SatuSuro 13:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC) btw sorry to spoil your ambition.... SatuSuro 13:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Murali leg spin
Hello there,
1995-96 is a bit too early for me - I was only 11 at the time - but a quick Google reveals that Murali was certainly doing Shane Warne impressions as far back as 1999, and last time I checked there was a YouTube link on Murali's Wiki article showing him doing the same thing this year. Also - SuggestBot (what a nice idea, I'd never heard of it) thinks you should do Northants Cricket Club eh? Any idea what gave it that notion? Cheers, Lfh 11:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Gee thanks, it's good to see my little research into the matter is appreciated. By the way, I'm not sure if you're a college student, but if you are you probably have free access to JSTOR. It's a great resource.--Pharos 12:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Pwn
(He he, titter). Thanks for the lovely complement, Shirt. Now I know what pwn means; but I promise you, as God is my witness, I will NEVER use it.
I checked out the list of 16 banned words, and I agree with most of them, but not "search". ("The parents of the pretty little 5-year-old girl were devastated when she went missing, dressed in her pink party dress with the huge blue bow. They went into the nearby forest and Googled for her for 8 hours before returning home at 4 a.m., exhausted." ... er, no, I don't think so.) Cheers JackofOz 22:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Loomis
Well, Hellooo again Shirty. You continue to embarrass me with your effusions of admiration. But I'm a big boy now, I can take it.
About Lewis, we do indeed have a good relationship, and I'd like to think it will withstand my latest and most strongly worded broadside. He's already apologised for the inappropriate behaviour that lead to it, and now seems to be taking a Wiki-breather to have a think about things. He appointed me his Wiki-mentor some time back, and I take that role seriously, so I trust he still considers me as such. Sometime strong words are called for, to make a person sit up and open their eyes and stop acting in a knee-jerk (or any kind of jerk) manner. "That's what friends are for". I'd really love to sit down with him over a bottle of red and explain in detail why some things work and others don't. Emails etc are fine, up to a point, but some things really need body language, personal rapport, and an uninterrupted dialogue. I'm sure you know what I mean. I'm even half-tempted to send him my phone number so we can chat about life and whatever. But I'll think a bit more before doing that. Have a great day, man. JackofOz 22:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Eeerie
But I cannot put my finger on anything at this point. Re the massacre article that is. My mate order checked it too. A once only edit. I have just been watching a spookie video too - will need to come back and look again on the weekend SatuSuro 13:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Possums, hominids, dentists in Zagreb and related matters
Tee hee. Thanks. All the best to you and your "household". Cheers -- JackofOz 23:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Shirt58, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:OfficerBarbrady.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Shirt58. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
-2007-05-17T03:09:00.000Z-Image:OfficerBarbrady.jpg){kind=link}
Helen Garner
Hi Shirt58. I notice that you put the info re the Archibald Prize in the lead section of the Garner article. I'm not sure that the Archibald prize info is appropriate for the lead section. Here is the Wikipedia style guidelines on Lead Sections WP:LS. As I understand it, the Lead Section should provide an overview and summary of what comes later - it generally should not, I think, have information that is not followed up later in the article. Also, as Garner's main claim to fame is her writing and as there is nothing specifically noteworthy/controversial about the Archibald painting of her (finalist, not winner etc), I think that this is interesting information well worth including but not the sort of critical information needed in the lead section? Anyhow, that's just my two-pennysworth. I am still learning here - still trying to understand, myself, what makes a good article, so am very open to discussing this with you. Cheers Sterry2607 (talk) 01:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- PS I agree that the info re criteria for the Prize need not be there. I didn't even properly notice that it was there when I was editing the article yesterday! Sterry2607 (talk) 01:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your generous response. It is so nice when these things can be discussed reasonably. I left the Archibald Prize info where it was until I heard from you. I think in the interim I'd put it under Life, but if the article got expanded it could perhaps go under some other section to do with her wider impact/recognition but we need more before we could do that. I have a love-hate relationship with her, but I do think she is a wonderful/powerful writer! And she admires one of my big favourites, Elizabeth Jolley. Then again, she is critical of another favourite of mine, Thea Astley! I have 'Cosmo cosmolino' next to my bed. I must read it one day. Cheers, Sterry2607 (talk) 11:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Oneword
Publishers, or the people who build their websites, can make mistakes like all of us, I suppose. I know I've made my share. Regards --ShelfSkewed Talk 12:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Southern Marsupial Mole pic in taxobox not visible.
Tried theme and variations of the wikicode that appeared in taxoboxen for similar furry animals, but pic refuses to come out of its burrow. {{helpme}} --Shirt58 (talk) 10:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Fixed 'Image' ? 'image'. Algebraist 11:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Re <shrugs shoulders, wry grin>
Do not add anything without reference, If other article has something which is unreferenced, then add reference, or remove them. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Civility#Reducing_the_impact; Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 7.--Shirt58 (talk) 11:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Ted Matthews
Hi Shirt 58. Indeed, he appears to be notable, but I placed the tags there because there were no references to say he was notable. What you've provided me with needs to appear in the article under a "References" or "External links" section. See below for info about refs and in-line cites. Best, PeterSymonds | talk 15:39, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Tyrenius's Guide to referencing
Click on "show" to open contents.
| Using references (citations) |
|---|
|
I thought you might find it useful to have some information about references (refs) on wikipedia. These are important to validate your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can removed unreferenced material; and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's highly advisable to also include a reference to say where it came from. Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started.
A reference must be accurate, i.e. it must prove the statement in the text. To validate "Mike Brown climbed Everest", it's no good linking to a page about Everest, if Mike Brown isn't mentioned, nor to one on Mike Brown, if it doesn't say that he climbed Everest. You have to link to a source that proves his achievement is true. You must use reliable sources, such as published books, mainstream press, and authorised web sites. Blogs, Myspace, Youtube, fan sites and extreme minority texts are not usually acceptable, nor is original research (e.g. your own unpublished, or self-published, essay or research), or another wikipedia article.
The first thing you have to do is to create a "Notes and references" section (unless it already exists). This goes towards the bottom of the page, below the "See also" section and above the "External links" section. Enter this code:
The next step is to put a reference in the text. Here is the code to do that. It goes at the end of the relevant term, phrase, sentence, or paragraph to which the note refers, and after punctuation such as a full stop, without a space (to prevent separation through line wrap):
Whatever text you put in between these two tags will become visible in the "Notes and references" section as your reference.
Open the edit box for this page, copy the following text (inserting your own text where indicated), paste it at the bottom of the page and save the page:
(End of text to copy and paste.) It should appear like this:
You need to include the information to enable the reader to find your source. For an online newspaper source, it might look like this:
When uploaded, it appears as:
Note the single square brackets around the URL and the article title. The format is:
Make sure there is a space between the URL and the Title. This code results in the URL being hidden and the title showing as a link. Use double apostrophes for the article title (it is quoted text), and two single quote marks either side of the name of the paper (to generate italics). Double square brackets round the name of the paper create an internal link (a wikilink) to the relevant wikipedia article. Apostrophes must go outside the brackets. The date after The Guardian is the date of the newspaper, and the date after "Retrieved on" is the date you accessed the site – useful for searching the web archive in case the link goes dead. Dates are wikilinked so that they work with user preference settings to display the date in the format the user wishes.
You can use sources which are not online, but which you have found in a library or elsewhere—in which case leave out the information which is not relevant. The newspaper example above would be formatted like this:
When uploaded, it appears as:
Here is an example for a book:
When uploaded, it appears as:
Make sure you put two single quote marks round the title (to generate italics), rather than one double quote mark.
These formats are all acceptable for dates:
You may prefer to use a citation template to compile details of the source. The template goes between the ref tags and you fill out the fields you wish to. Basic templates can be found here: Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference
The first time a reference appears in the article, you can give it a simple name in the <ref> code:
The second time you use the same reference in the article, you need only to create a short cut instead of typing it all out again:
You can then use the short cut as many times as you want. Don't forget the /, or it will blank the rest of the article! A short cut will only pick up from higher up the page, so make sure the first ref is the full one. Some symbols don't work in the ref name, but you'll find out if you use them. You can see multiple use of the same refs in action in the article William Bowyer (artist). There are 3 sources and they are each referenced 3 times. Each statement in the article has a footnote to show what its source is.
The above method is simple and combines references and notes into one section. A refinement is to put the full details of the references in their own section headed "References", while the notes which apply to them appear in a separate section headed "Notes". The notes can be inserted in the main article text in an abbreviated form as seen in Harriet Arbuthnot or in a full form as in Brown Dog affair.
More information can be found at:
I hope this helps. If you need any assistance, let me know. |
Speedy deletion of Cassiopedia
A tag has been placed on Cassiopedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
MSA and Houli
Hello! The reason I asked why you'd want the MSA rendering of the name was to point out that the name should be transcribed or transliterated in Lebanese Arabic rather than MSA. For example, the name Jamal is pronounced Gamal in Egyptian, so it has to be transliterated the same way. Thanks for the kind Easter wishes, though I prefer the secular and more ancient holiday Sham El Nessim, which Egyptians of all religions (or lack thereof) celebrated recently as well :-) Cheers, — Zerida ? 23:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Generally accepted scholarly version of the Bible
The NIV is not the generally accepted scholarly version of the Bible. Scholars generally use the NRSV as a reference. Tb (talk) 00:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Redirect of Abu Nacheem
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Abu Nacheem, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Abu Nacheem is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Abu Nacheem, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Re:Einstein
My fault. Here's your reference: http://blogs.cricinfo.com/tourdiaries/archives/2008/02/james_itouch_an.php —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.24.233.22 (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Bromocholorthingumyjigger
Err, thanks! I think I'll pop it on my userpage anyway, I don't get many awards! Ged UK (talk) 14:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Now, you changing my talk page now makes me look stupid here! :p Ged UK (talk) 14:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, and i was too stupid to notice! Sleep well :) Ged UK (talk) 15:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Your note
Hi Shirt! Replied. delldot talk 16:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Important vote at wiki-project rugby league
Many people have been working hard on getting a new infobox up and running and we would like to have your thoughts on the subject here. CorleoneSerpicoMontana 07:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Anna Wohlin
An article that you have been involved in editing, Anna Wohlin, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Wohlin. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?--Shirt58 (talk) 10:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Can't find Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baxter Basics discussion
{{helpme}}
The article Baxter Basics has been tagged for deletion. I'd like to comment, but despite looking all over the place, can't find the impugned article's WP:AFD discussion anywhere. Your help greatly appreciated!--Shirt58 (talk) 10:28, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's been prodded, meaning there's no discussion and it will be deleted after 5 days if nobody complains. Feel free to remove the prod tag from the page if you disagree, preferably with a reason. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 10:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Need "strong break" or "hard break" wikicode to separate quotes in Kabir#Poetry
{{helpme}}
The {{cquote| }}s in Kabir#Poetry are currently like this:
- Poetry quote one
- Poetry quote two
- Poetry quote two
They should be on the same indent level, ie:
- Poetry quote one
- Poetry quote two
There's wikicode to fix this, a "strong break" or "hard break" or somesuch, but I'm demmed if I can find it.
Your help greatly appreciated! --Shirt58 (talk) 13:34, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- Taking a look.... GtstrickyTalk or C 13:38, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
ITN
|
On 19 October, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) Sachin Tendulkar, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page. |
--SpencerT?C 01:48, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Children's
Well if both are correct, you'll understand if I leave it in the form that looks more right to me, and that has six times the number of google hits. :) — Swpb? • c 18:55, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Eliot Perlman
I don't have any major problems with the changes. We just need a section titled "Awards and nominations". And then book pages for each of his works. --Perry Middlemiss (talk) 22:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
<nowiki>{{cite}} plus |date=year-month-day |access date=year-month-day URL muddling up help needed. </nowiki>
{{helpme}}
Hi All,
Using the various <ref> {{cite n}} </ref> s, many of the edit URL refs resove as http://www.example.com/+(2008-11-27).+Retrieved , adding in the access date and '+Retrieved' to the URL, like this edit. What am I doing wrong? Your help much needed, and will be very much gratefully received.
pmd --Shirt58 (talk) 12:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hi.. the issue is using a full URL in the 'publisher' field. The publisher should be the name of the website, not a link to the website itself. // roux 12:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:31, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:HodderAndStoughton HarryTurtledove TheVictoriousOpposition Cover 2003.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HodderAndStoughton HarryTurtledove TheVictoriousOpposition Cover 2003.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for File:HodderAndStoughton HarryTurtledove TheVictoriousOpposition Cover 2003.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HodderAndStoughton HarryTurtledove TheVictoriousOpposition Cover 2003.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Shirt58. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
