User talk:Silence-is-infinite

Welcome!

Hello, Silence-is-infinite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you for adding the length to Scandale Beck. DThomsen8 (talk) 16:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Great Mell Fell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brittonic language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hart Side may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

whole Green Side and Hart Side ridge, with Watermillock Common to the left, seen from Great Dodd]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverts reverts

Why on Earth did you revert all my edits to Lake District fells sub-headings and then revert them again? That was a sheer waste of time wasn't it. FYI, however, the term "view" is not a good word for any sub-heading, it invites editorialising because a "view" from a hill depends on where you look and what your perspective is, as well as when the view was witnessed - views can change due to construction, deforestation, natural shifts, no view now is exactly the same as when Wainwright wrote his pictoral guides, for example, because of environmental changes, development and so forth. Whereas a "Summit" is a fixed geographical point and is all we need to focus on in an encyclopaedic manner to avoid subjective "I can see my house from here" type descriptions of "views". A lot of the descriptions of views in those articles are full of puffery, personal ideas about the "spectacular" sights, which are not supported by citations and such descriptions should really only be used when quoted from people like Wainwright, rather than editor POV. As such I cut back the sub-headings to produce a less dramatic format throughout the range of articles. You should respect that and leave off the trigger-happy Undo option next time you're uncertain about why such edits have been made - ask, it's not only good manners but will save you from wasting a lot of time - mine and yours, as you now know. I gather by your self-reverts that it finally dawned on you the reason for my edits. There were 214 articles to work through, I don't have the patience to type tons of edit summaries in addition to improving the content, life's too short - if they're that important ask the wiki-software designer's to make summaries mandatory rather than optional. 82.8.252.13 (talk) 21:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your explanation, 82.8.252.13. But why on earth are you hiding behind an IP address, and not logging in to Wikipedia? I'm actually in agreement with your views. What I find difficult is the way you have gone about your edits, with no explanation and no opportunity to talk. I don't know if you'll see this comment - placing it on my own talk page is not a very reliable way of making contact! Silence-is-infinite (talk) 16:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"But why on earth are you hiding behind an IP address, and not logging in to Wikipedia?" – don't want to use an account, anonymity isn't "hiding" it's a choice, IPs are human too you know, but when I have an account you'll be the first to know. I saw your reply though, glad we're in agreement, makes things easier. If you need to talk to them IPs do have a talk page too, you know, and receive "new message" notifications so long as they still have that IP next time they visit. My IP will remain this one for now. But as the discussion started here it may as well continue here if needs be. 82.8.252.13 (talk) 20:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Clough Head may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The whole of Clough Head, Threlkeld Knotts and Threlkeld Common (above the [[Wikt:intake|intake]] wall which surrounds the lower agricultural land and Threlkeld

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:07, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helvellyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raise. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helvellyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raise. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Helvellyn

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Helvellyn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Helvellyn

The article Helvellyn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Helvellyn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:42, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greenside Mine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dyke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK? before GA?

Hi Sii, you can qualify for dyk if your article is less than a week old or its a new GA. I suspect that your Mine article is bound for GA. My comment about "OK for GA" was to deter others who may propose that it waits until its a GA. Im keen to get it through before this. Do feel free to interfere in the DYK process if you think you can help. Thanks for the article. (I also improved the article on Head's adopted heir). Victuallers (talk) 22:00, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Greenside Mine

On 10 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Greenside Mine, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that large holes on the side of a Cumbrian mountain show where 18th-century mine workings in Greenside Mine have collapsed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Greenside Mine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rubers Law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kelso. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Silence-is-infinite. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Silence-is-infinite. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Silence-is-infinite. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]