User talk:Sirrebral

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Sirrebral, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 11:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Do you live in Sacramento ? I do and am interested in collaborating on projects of interest in Sacramento. Peace, rkmlai (talk) 23:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harold Hongju Koh speaking at a press briefing in Geneva.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Harold Hongju Koh speaking at a press briefing in Geneva.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:13, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kappa Alpha Psi Province map.

A couple of comments

I know that you want to continue using colors that mean something to ΚΑΨ, but it is unclear where the borders between E/EC/SC/SE are. More colors would be appreciated.
According to their website, Middle East only contains Southern WV and North Carolina. The map includes a part of Virginia to connect them, but that doesn't seem to be supported anywhere.
I think it might make sense to include the situation with ND/SD/MT/WY. Are they officially part of no Region?

Naraht (talk) 14:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Naraht. I'll try to address each of your comments from the context of documenting why the map was created as it was:

More colors are not necessary. The map uses the four color theorem to ensure that adjacent provinces do not share a color. Perhaps the contrast between the white and the cream regions is lower than some may desire, but I've chosen to stick with this color scheme.
Provinces do not have strictly-defined borders. While their boundaries generally mirror those of clustered states, a province is defined by the chapters that it contains. Sometimes it makes more logistical sense for a city or campus on the outskirts of one province to be affiliated with an adjacent province due to the proximity of neighboring chapters (e.g. the Toledo, Ohio metro area; the Fayetteville, Arkansas metro area; etc). I created the map only after painstakingly identifying all of the these "exceptions" chapters and drawing lines that included their locations; in the case of the line dividing Mississippi, the line had to be moved substantially north to avoid erroneously implying that some Southwestern Province chapters were in the Middle Eastern Province. Similarly, I verified up all of the chapter locations in Virginia prior to coloring the southwestern wing of the state with the chapters immediately to its north and south; it is clear that the southernmost chapter in West Virginia has more neighboring chapters in northwestern North Carolina than in the western wing of Virginia, and that the same would be true of any chapters that might be established along the Interstate 77 highway that connects southern West Virginia with western North Carolina.
While I understand that some may wonder about the relationship of these states to the provinces, it is reasonable that the reader will deduce, as you have, that those states have no association with any province. (See explanation above regarding province boundaries being a reflection of the chapters assigned to them.

Finally, I'd point out that this map was incorporated into the the organization's national website in 2011, and has been reproduced on some provinces's websites. I'd like to think that this occurred because the map is more accurate than any existing works; it is certainly more accurate than any I have come across during the past 20 years.

Sirrebral (talk) 00:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Making a Difference Book Cover.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Making a Difference Book Cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:09, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:KVIE station logo.svg

The file File:KVIE station logo.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free former logo whose use in KVIE fails WP:NFCC#8. Non-free former logos are sometimes allowed when they themselves are the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-4, but that's not the case here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marchjuly (talk) 05:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KVIE station logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KVIE station logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Harold Hongju Koh speaking at a press briefing in Geneva.jpg

The file File:Harold Hongju Koh speaking at a press briefing in Geneva.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]