User talk:Souryadeep630

Welcome!

Hello, Souryadeep630! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller talk 12:32, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2019

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mohammad Hamid Ansari—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:47, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

Don't ignore/remove clear editing instructions as you did at Ram Nath Kovind Begoon 10:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Sudha Murty has been removed, as it added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. Begoon 00:37, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add honorifics such as "Sri'

That's something we ask editors to avoid.Thanks. Doug Weller talk 12:33, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User

You are also Lawful Neutral is it? Which D&D game you are playing lately? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:06, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neverwinter Souryadeep630 (talk) 12:31, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Do you Powerlift as well? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:12, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I have a keen observation over my body fitness Souryadeep630 (talk) 11:41, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 05:57, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on List of presidents of the Bharatiya Janata Party. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DBig Xrayᗙ 05:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I had added a suitable reference source. Please tell where I can correct myself Souryadeep630 (talk) 05:58, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Souryadeep630, he is yet to be declared the president. Results are not out yet. DBig Xrayᗙ 05:59, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Souryadeep630 (talk) 06:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited K. J. George, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajeev Chandrasekhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:03, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Hesson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IPL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bharatiya Janata Party, Karnataka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharatiya Janata Party, Karnataka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharatiya Janata Party, Karnataka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 06:02, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rajkumar (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gajanur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bharatiya Janata Party, Karnataka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arun Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Assam Vidhan Sabha constituency, Template:Infobox Kerala Niyamasabha Constituency, Template:Infobox Vidhan Sabha constituency, Template:Infobox state assembly constituency and Template:Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency

Template:Infobox Assam Vidhan Sabha constituency, Template:Infobox Kerala Niyamasabha Constituency, Template:Infobox Vidhan Sabha constituency and Template:Infobox state assembly constituency has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox Indian state legislative assembly constituency. You are invited to comment on the discussion at wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 July 14#Infobox Assam Vidhan Sabha constituency. Thank you. 122.167.185.249 (talk) 13:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent help

Persistent vandalisation of Union cabinet minister L. Murugan page and Temples of Tamil Nadu page by some suspicious IPs. Please protect those pages.

Indiaproject (talk) 20:00, 16 July 2021 (UTC) You are reported indiaproject.157.49.72.200 (talk) 20:21, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello, just came here to thank you for your contributionDavidWood11 (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit of Former power/office(s) held by the Presidents reverted

Hello! Good Evening I had brought in some new information about the previous offices held by the respective Presidents of India. This information would help all users in gaining information and knowledge about the career background of the Presidents. This edit was reverted User:DaxServer stating the irrelevance of the information. I do feel that these knowledge would help Indian community to gain more political awareness and understanding. Hence I request that I would re-edit the same relevant information back into the table. Thank you Souryadeep630 (talk) 09:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Please achieve consensus for your edits, and without misrepresenting what the talk page discussions are about in your edit summaries! — DaxServer (t · c) 17:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC) [reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— DaxServer (t · c) 13:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, Thank you Souryadeep630 (talk) 14:27, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) — DaxServer (t · c) 17:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Modi

I have undone your revert of my edit. A warning - do not, ever again, accuse me of falsifying a source. And if you'd like to add some more sources (since all you have done is remove perfectly good ones without fixing the problem), feel free to Google "BJP corporate lobbying" or similar things - ensuring of course you use reliable sources and not biased political opinion pieces etc. Black Kite (talk) 12:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Black Kite Its nice that you have visited my talk page. 1) Firstly The revert undone is not seen in the article page. 2) The warning is chilling and acceptable thank you but I have stated facts about the sources that was present before reverting. I request you to take another look and revise the source that was reverted. 3) All that which I have done is removing of the citations that are not at all relevant to the information typed adjacent to it. I would definitely Google for any articles if I was the the one typing the information, and the same lies with respected editors like you, 4) Please continue your "unbiased", impartial addition of political information to article pages in Wikipedia. Keep up the good work Cheers, Souryadeep630 (talk) 16:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many apologies. I realised after I'd posted to your page that I'd got this wrong, and I thought I'd removed the above comment from your talk page, but clearly my edit didn't remove it (not sure what happened there). Black Kite (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. Cheers Souryadeep630 (talk) 02:46, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Exit polls

Exit polls need to be added in the similar tabular format as opinion polls on 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election. I added the same format unde section "Exit polls" for ease but you seem to have deleted it. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's kind of you, but I'm a political analyst and there is no alliance of parties in Uttar Pradesh, as the columns stayed NDA, UPA and MGB Souryadeep630 (talk) 15:07, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should know that BJP is in alliance with 2 parties and SP with 7 parties. Dhruv edits (talk) 15:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apna Dal and other BJP alliance has not integrated its party with the NDA, it must be called BJP+ and not NDA until all the alliance parties are into the NDA

Copyright violations

You were warned in December 2019 about adding copyrighted material to Wikipedia.[1] As you were told then, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. You recently created the article Justice for the Judge: An Autobiography by copying and pasting from this internet page. You have been blocked for a week for persistent copyright violations. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

What worries me the most is that if you have violated copyright twice (recently in a very egregious way), it seems likely there may have been more in the intervening couple of years. Please note below this post any other articles you have created, or significantly added to, by copying text from the internet, or from a print book, so that we can take care of it. Bishonen | tålk 20:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Souryadeep630 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I have used an image from a website and not mentioned the permissions and other requisites. I would like to say that this is the first copyright violation which was totally unintentional in the past 16 months (2 and a half years). I now totally understand the guidelines and pledge that I would not in any instance repeat the mistake anytime in future. I have made around 970 constructive content editings which I love. I strongly assure all administrators and other respective editors that no such mistake would ever be repeated and would accept a permanent blockage if repeated. Hence I sincerely request to revoke the block on my account and unblock the same and oblige. Thank You Souryadeep630 (talk) 11:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm tempted to extend the block indefinitely. This is not just about the image. You also copied text from here. Why are you falsely claiming this is just about the image? Yamla (talk) 12:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes, that is a very disingenuous appeal. You created an article by pasting text from a copyrighted site and you call it "totally unintentional"? Please answer Yamla's question or I'll probably indef you myself. There are twelve months in a year, by the way. Bishonen | tålk 12:22, 23 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

I told you above you needed to answer the question about your disingenuous (=untrue) description of your copyright violation, or you'd probably be blocked indefinitely. Instead of answering, you have continued to edit, among other things adding misinformation to Amit Shah [2] (Shah was arrested for his role in a fake encounter killing, not during the emergency) and adding content from a government press release to Basavaraj Bommai in Wikipedia's voice.[3] I'm sorry, but it does not appear that you have the competence to edit in the fraught area of Indian politics. I have blocked you indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 21:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. I accept my mistake and apologize. I was really unaware that copying text from a website wasn't allowed. I have clearly read the guides and policies of Wikipedia and I have totally understood it and is in my memory. Editing and interacting in wikipedia has been one of the strengths in my lonely life. I have done nearly 1000 contributions, and I request you to pardon a couple of mistakes recently done. I pledge my word that this would never ever be repeated and I request for a final chance for editing. I will use all the suggestions and experience I have had in the period of editings I have done. Thus I bring in my sincere request to allow me to contribute more to wikipedia, and keep a radar on me if at all one more mistake from my side, I would accept the punishment. Thank you Souryadeep630 (talk) 06:45, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Souryadeep630 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I accept my mistake and apologize. I was really unaware that copying text from a website wasn't allowed. I have clearly read the guides and policies of Wikipedia and I have totally understood it and is in my memory. Editing and interacting in wikipedia has been one of the main strengths and connection in my lonely life. I have done nearly 1000 contributions, and I request you to pardon a couple of mistakes recently done. I pledge my word that this would never ever be repeated and I request for a final chance for editing. I will use all the suggestions and experience I have had in the period of editings I have done. Thus I bring in my sincere request to allow me to contribute more to wikipedia, and keep a radar on me if at all one more mistake from my side, I would accept the punishment. My apologies and a sincere request. Thank you Souryadeep630 (talk) 06:48, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have lifted the block in exchange for a topic ban from Indian politics. See below for details. Bishonen | tålk 10:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Souryadeep630, in my opinion it's unacceptable for you to edit in Indian politics. Unfortunately, Indian politics seems to be your only interest on Wikipedia. Are there any other subjects you think you might like to edit? I'd be prepared to lift the block in exchange for a topic ban from Indian politics. Please follow my link and read what a topic ban is, and please be aware that such a ban would basically have disallowed all the editing you have done so far. Violations of topic bans are taken seriously and lead to long blocks. Bishonen | tålk 08:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Yes I do edit entertainment, sports, history and blp articles. There has been a few mistakes from my side which I totally know how not to repeat after reading the guidelines of wikipedia completely. Hence I request your kind self to lift the block, and provide one ultimate chance to contribute. Bishonen Thank you Souryadeep630 (talk) 06:28, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Souryadeep, are you saying you will accept a topic ban from Indian politics in exchange for lifting the block? When you say "history and blp", perhaps I need to be more clear. BLP's on figures related to politics, such as Yogi Adityanath, would be out of bounds, as well as other articles related to political figures, such as List of presidents of India. Note that people can be related to politics without being primarily politicians. For example, Ranjan Gogoi, who is primarily a judge but also a member of the Rajya Sabha, would be out of bounds. You would only be allowed to edit BLPs like Ravindra Jadeja. As for historical articles, arguments about Indian history for political reasons are very common on Wikipedia, and many historical articles see interest that is really more political than historical. You would not be allowed to edit those kinds of articles either, and would be expected to ask an administrator first if you had any doubts about editing a particular article. If you state explicitly below that these things are clear to you and you will abide by them, I will lift your block. Bishonen | tålk 08:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Yes I clearly understand and I will abide by it. Souryadeep630 (talk) 09:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I have lifted the block. Happy editing! Bishonen | tålk 10:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

I will contribute positively to my fullest abilities, and will keep my word Souryadeep630 (talk) 10:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Souryadeep630 Your 3 edits to Ram Nath Kovind [4] are a violation of your TBAN — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reimposed an indefinite block. Souryadeep630, I'm very disappointed you were unwilling or unable to abide by the topic ban you agreed to. --Yamla (talk) 11:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]