User talk:The Armchair General

The Armchair General, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi The Armchair General! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warm welcome

Hello there, I am User:TheCaliforniaKansan. I saw your input in the Paul Ryan talk page,and I wanted to thank you for that. It seems that you do care about Wikipedia and its content. I suggest you further edit your User page! Take a look at mine if for some help. Here are some templates you might want to include on your page:

This user is obsessed with
Cheeses

This user loves movies.

This user is interested in space-related articles.

360

This user owns an
Xbox 360

-TheCaliforniaKansan (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome. Just trying to make accurate changes and updates to Wikipedia. I'm still very new to editing but I hope to fix my page up shortly. The Armchair General (talk) 17:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

A RfC on an article in which you've been involved in has been opened here. This notice has been provided to the five most recent participants on the article Talk page as an WP:APPNOTE. LavaBaron (talk) 21:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

barnstar

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		For fastidious fact-checking of a controversial article. LavaBaron (talk) 04:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to International Association of Athletics Federations may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

s track and field team from entering the Rio de Janeiro Olypics.<ref name="Associated Press">[[cite web |title= IAAF upholds bans on Russian athletes for Rio Games |url=http://www.bigstory.ap.
|date= 17 June 2016 |accessdate= 17 June 2016}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Weiss article

Much appreciate your note. Always glad to meet an editor who deals fairly with BLPs. Not always easy when there are COIs and possibly sockpuppeting. cheers, Coretheapple (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you very much

Your endorsement is much appreciated, TAG. I still think we were on the right side of the argument, but that's the way it goes, sometimes. Best Regards. Motsebboh (talk) 01:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to agree with you. Apparently the SPLC has a lot of admirers and will protect them from criticism even when it's appropriate. It also won't stop them from disregarding the rule's they're citing, to protect the SPLC, in order to pepper groups the SPLC doesn't like with criticism. However, it is not worth arguing with everyone on the back end. Even if your argument is grounded in facts, challenging everyone will only lead people to become more guarded and cling to their initial opinion. TAG (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Armchair General. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, The Armchair General. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]