User talk:Trashbird1240

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Why are there only two of us on the page for "Users who use GNU/linux"? --Anthonybaldwin (talk) 11:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We must be the only ones!Trashbird1240 (talk) 14:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Extinction probability

Don't suppose you feel like adding to this stub? (Thanks for the baklava.) Rich Farmbrough, 15:12, 10 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Article [[Inbreeding coefficient]

Hello. I've reverted your removal of the redirect since that created a blank page. For now, let's keep the redirect since the titles sound similar. If you believe that another article can be created, please add enough notable material based on reliable sources. If you believe that the redirect should be deleted, please add it at WP:RFD. Please leave any questions or comments on my talk page. Thanks. KJ ^{click here} 22:38, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Notmuch

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Notmuch . zazpot (talk) 21:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Little Women (2019 film)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Little Women (2019 film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. KyleJoan^talk 04:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KyleJoan Edit war? Oh really? Sorry, but you're the one who can't cite a Wikipedia policy or logical reason as to why you keep deleting that section. Are you seriously trying to block me from editing when you're just making destructive edits and can't adequately explain why? Fine. You win, but consider that this is the kind of behavior that undermines Wikipedia's credibility. That hurts everyone. Trashbird1240 (talk) 05:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What hurts everyone is going to an article that has undergone an extensive Good Article nomination process, passed, and remained stable for years to impose a subjective view rather than seek a consensus. You mentioned policy. Which policy have you cited? KyleJoan^talk 05:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KyleJoan How does the section hurt the quality of the article? You haven't explained that. Adding a section with additional information is not "a subjective view." You're just exercising control over this article instead of considering what's valuable to readers of Wikipedia. Trashbird1240 (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]