User talk:TwoTone22

Welcome!

Hello, TwoTone22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 20:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Logmein

Logmein has been deleted before. Please do not repost. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 20:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Deletion Log and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LogMeIn - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 20:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry - I was not ignoring you - I simply was busy at work. There was an earlier article on LogMeIn, and a number of people thought it didn't meet notability standards in WP:SOFTWARE. It matters little who nominated and who voted - there was consensus, and an administrator deleted it. If you believe we were all wrong, that is possible, though not likely. Figure out how it meets WP:SOFTWARE, and if you still feel strongly about it, you can take it to deletion review, WP:DRV, where standards of undeletion are appropriately tougher. I know nothing to comparable services w/ articles here, and I am not receptive to arguments, such as "we have an article on X, why should we delete the one on Y." Remember that Wikipedia has a policy of no binding precedents, WP:NBD. Finally, I hear commercials for Gotomypc.com every morning on the radio here in NY and my general impression is that gotomypc is a lot more widely used. Plus, it might squeeze in as an article about a business, according to WP:CORP. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 23:49, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be assured that my jocular comment to CrzRussian was intended neither to suggest that you would impute to him any inappropriate animus nor to suggest that the article in which you are interested (and the surrounding deletion debate) is unimportant. My comment, I think, was simply a throwaway one, and I hope you'll not have inferred any serious quality; if you did, you have my apologies. Joe 04:14, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will absolutely do neither, per WP:POINT and per common sense. If you wish, you may list it at WP:DRV. This is all I have to say on the topic. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 13:17, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]