User talk:Typhoon2009

Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept!

--Anhamirak 14:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2009 Pacific typhoon season. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Jason Rees (talk) 13:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, 2009 PTS is Fully protected for 3 days. Second, reverting and removing numbers no matter how unencyclopedic you think they are can be considered vandalism if consensus is not determined. There was a prior consensus before the event favoring Jason Rees. Third, you are already being investigated for violating the 3 revert rule and this is a blockable offense. Lastly, if you continue with the removing and reverting, I can guarantee you will be blocked. Thanks, and please stop. Darren 23 ^{My Contributions} 04:08, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see any consensus on those unencyclopedic numbers so far.Typhoon2009 (talk) 03:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So why have we been using it for a long time now? And the way it probably is going, we wont achieve a consensus and the current system will remain, and also, DO NOT CHANGE NUMBERS WITHOUT PRIOR CONSENSUS. Thank you. Darren 23 ^{My Contributions} 01:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JMA Numbering

Please do not make any changes to the 2009 Pacific typhoon season in regards to the numbering of tropical depressions until the debate has been resolved. Cheers, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please don't change the numbers even if you think it is false information, removing the numbers without discussing can get you blocked. Darren 23^Edits|Mail 12:22, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone says that a dispute tag is not needed, it means that a discussion with him is not needed.Typhoon2009 (talk) 13:24, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That person means that the dicussion is not needed because these is a prior consensus to use the numbers and you have been reported to WP:AIV for your actions. Good day. Darren 23^Edits|Mail 13:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WPTC Assessment

Hi! Since you have recently posted to WT:WPTC or otherwise been involved with tropical cyclone articles, please nominate and review pages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment so we can revive this process. Thanks in advance, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to 2009 Pacific typhoon season, you will be blocked from editing. Jason Rees (talk) 16:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2009 Pacific typhoon season. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --> Alan (talk) 13:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2009 Pacific typhoon season. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --> –Howard the Duck 14:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]