User talk:Worldhunt

Image tagging for Image:Picture 001.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Picture 001.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Aerial Lost Arrow.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Aerial Lost Arrow.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism of World Hunting Association

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you wish to dispute the content of the article, please discuss it on the talk page: Talk:World Hunting Association. Russell E 00:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lost Arrow Ranch

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lost Arrow Ranch, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.lstarrow.com/index.htm. As a copyright violation, Lost Arrow Ranch appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lost Arrow Ranch has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Lost Arrow Ranch. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Lost Arrow Ranch, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Lau ren 15:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cabal Mediation

Your comments are requested at a mediation case regarding the editing of the World Hunting Association page. Lau ren 21:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further vandalism of World Hunting Association

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you wish to dispute the contents of the article, do it on the talk page (Talk:World Hunting Association). Blanking material without comment considered vandalism and will be dealt with accordingly. Russell E 10:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

23 Oct 2006

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ginkgo100 ^{talk · e@} 21:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

==

Lost Arrow Ranch is a fenced preserve. You admit as much yourself and the owners of Lost Arrow Ranch don’t try to hide the fact, they promote the quality of the deer within the "preserve". David Farbman said himself in an interview with Outdoor Life’s Michael Hanback that “use of the 1,000-acre preserve allows for a "controlled competition" and ensures that the tournaments will not adversely impact wild game populations or infringe upon hunting opportunities on public and private land for regularly licensed hunters”.

THE WHA HAS MOVED AWAY FROM FENCED ENVIRONMENTS. whainfo@worldhunt.com

The WHA have already held one event within the fenced environment of Lost Arrow Ranch, and they advertise on their website another hunt there scheduled for November. Are you now claiming different? Will the Texas hunt be free range, or will it be within a game preserve (high fence)? Jindydiver 04:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From the WHA's own website "Although all of the participants practice fair chase hunting, it is imperative to hold these competitions in a controlled environment so the competitions don't infringe on the hunting of others on private or public land. The tournaments will be held on large high fence ranches that mimic a fair chase environment. A high fence ranch offers the appropriately controlled environment and allows the ability for the WHA to educate the public properly regarding herd and food plot management. All of the participants (as well as many WHA employees) are avid fair chase hunters."

Seems fairly cut and dried Jindydiver 04:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHA

can somebody please remove the mis-information and false accusations on the WHA wiki page?

Please be a little more specific. Laurə n^whisper 16:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Worldhunt, as I've asked a number of times, if you have a problem with the content of World Hunting Association, you must discuss it on the talk page, Talk:World Hunting Association. Read through what was already dicussed with Pete1080 first, then state your case in specific terms on the talk page. Also it would be useful if you could sign your comments by putting four tildes at the end of them (~~~~), it automatically replaces it with your name and date just so we can keep track of who's saying what. I think your block has expired and you can edit what you want, but just deleting stuff on the page isn't the right way to dispute content, it's vandalism, and will get you blocked again. So please, discuss what changes you would like to see, and try to reach a consensus with other contributors (as Pete1080 did) before making any major changes to the article.--Russell E 00:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More vandalism of WHA

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism to World Hunting Association will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Russell E 00:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete information from the WHA article. If you have issues with content, please reach a consensus with other editors on the article's talk page. Also, please do not insert address information into the article — see WP:NOT. — ERcheck (talk) 04:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go again. Once again you are blanking parts of the article while refusing to document your sources properly on the talk page.

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Russell E 22:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THE WHA IS NOT HOSTING FENCED IN HUNTS!

Will you please stop with the lies and vandalismWorldhunt 02:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The WHA has hosted "fenced in hunts" and still claims in it's FAQ's that it will host hunts in "controlled environments". It is a bit ripe to claim one thing here while your own website contradicts you. If people are using your webpages to get their infomation how can you claim it to be lies? Jindydiver 03:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]