User talk:X-Weinzar

Hal Leonard page

Kindly stop deleting my edits to the Hal Leonard page. I have on numerous occasions added detailed information about our company's history, what we do, and who we represent – valuable information to anyone interested in Hal Leonard – only to have this robust entry be edited back to a stub. I am not adding "advertising," just factual data about the company, where I have worked for decades. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorihagopian (talk • contribs) 14:42, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamo Dresden

That's brilliant, thanks - I'll certainly be using those images. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Am I making people crazy with my editing style? It is a bit artistic... I allways think I am ready, but ...Found more and more interesting Stollen details.. And I do make a lot of mistakes all the time, and have to correct them.

Sorry, but I am almost done.

Merry Christmast Warrington (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i WILL TRY TO DO THAT BUT I CAN NOT PROMISE THAT I WILL MAKE ONLY ONE EDIT PER ARTICLE. TIME GOES BY AND I FIND NEW WAYS OF IMPROVING THINGS, FIND NEW SOURCES, RETURN TO THE ARTICLES, MAYBE THE NEXT DAY, AND SO ON. Warrington (talk) 16:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving the artricle was the point. Just take a look at the history of the Dutch Empire and see what The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick is doing there, for example. 25 edits is not that much, considering that .

1.Cleaned up the article.

2 I realised the an information about one ingredient is wrong. Fixed that.

3 I realised the an other information about an other ingredient is wrong. Fixed thattoo.

4 I realised that an other information about the time period wrong.

5 I realised that an other information about a Pope was wrong. Found a new Pope but it was wrong,

6 I found a the righ Pope. I thougt I was done.

7 searching for more info about the Pope I found a new source and added more info, and things needed to be changed in the article.

8 when I was ready found again a new source by chance again, and again everyting changed a bit again.

It could be me or it could have been 20 other people.

Warrington (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flagged Revs

Hi,

I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 06:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message.

I'd be happy to move the discussion to talk:/trial if you think it's worth continuing. Arguing on our user talk pages would be a bit pointless I think, since presumably we're both trying to influence other readers, not just each other. PaddyLeahy (talk) 11:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent trial

Hi X-Weinzar, did you see a discussion about a test period where the edits were shown to all in the DE archive ? were FR was used as vandalism patrol ? see Wikipedia_talk:Flagged_revisions/Trial/Proposed_trials#Flagging_but_not_hiding:_at_least_in_first_trial. Cheers Mion (talk) 12:12, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi, i checked the DE archive and asked a little de:Benutzer_Diskussion:P._Birken#Transparent_trial, but nothing about the trial so far, there is no hurry. but if you stumble upon it that would be most welcome, cheers Mion (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Columbia River

Hi, just wanted to let you know, in case you haven't spotted it -- we went ahead with your kind suggestion and nominated Columbia River for FA a couple weeks ago...the review is underway! Thanks again for all the nudges, and sorry I wasn't quicker to respond. -Pete (talk) 17:06, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you finally did it ;-) Great to see that this truly excellent article finally gets what it deserves. Looks like just what I had expected: Some minor minor minor stuff but overall simply a matter of actually putting it up as candidate. Thanks for stopping by and dropping a note -- I hadn't noticed yet as I've been rather busy in RL and not really active at en-WP anyways. --X-Weinzar (talk) 01:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image attribution

Hi X-Weinzar, I'd like to use your photograph of the Transparent Factory on the title page of a report concerning the World Culture Forum. So I was wondering: how would you like to be attributed in the document? Schnecksche (talk) 11:53, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Du kannst gleich ....

.... noch mal all deine Arbeit hier bezüglich der Interwikis überprüfen. Nicht, weil ich jetzt besonders gemein bin, sondern weil Wikipedia es ist. Leider haben nämlich jetzt alle englischen Artikel einen Link zur deutschen Wiki, aber nicht die deutschen Artikel zu englischen. Das fiel mir gerade auf, nachdem ich einen Artikel, den du eigentlich ergänzt hattest, nochmal auf deutscher Seite ergänzen musste. Ergärlich. :/ -- Critican.kane (talk) 06:33, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nö, dafür sind die Interwiki-Bots da. Sobald es Verlinkungen in eine Richtung gibt, wird die andere von ihnen ergänzt. Kann ein paar Tage dauern, aber funktioniert: ping-pong, ping-pong, ping-pong, ping-pong, ping-pong, ping-pong, ping-pong, .... Wenn einem das nicht schnell genug geht, kann man es natürlich auch per Hand machen, aber z.B. gerade in den letzten Beispielen müsste man das dann gleich in mehreren Sprachversionen machen, das wäre dann recht viel Aufwand dafür, dass es sowieso wenig später von den Bots erledigt wird. --X-Weinzar (talk) 09:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]