Jump to content

User talk:Yoctownyocol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

)

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brentwood, California (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Liberty High School, Heritage High School and Freedom High School
Antioch, California (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Baltimore Colts

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited List of California Historical Landmarks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pioneer Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that an article you started, the Charles W. Merrill House was very inaccurate so I've changed it and added a ref or two. No problem - we all make mistakes, but I wanted to let you know (maybe I've made a mistake?). I'll be working on it further, and hopefully you can check out my work on it! Smallbones (talk) 06:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Denny,CA

[edit]

Hello! I was bombing around some articles on towns, areas, what have you, and I saw the one on Denny. If I read the history correctly, it was you that added this part: "Still has a few residential houses in the area. In the 1970's there was a mining war between civilians and the Forest Service in which two people died."

The reason I am bothering you is that I wonder if you are referring to the incident in 1977 or 1978? I was peripherally involved, knowing one of the dead men quite well. It's been decades of course, but while mining was involved, the Forest Service was not. It was quite a tale, even making the front page of the SF Chronicle (a copy of which I used to have, but have misplaced). Of course you may have been referring to another incident, and I beg your pardon then. Thanks Gingervlad (talk) 08:25, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 31

[edit]

Hi again. I don't think I can add anything to the article, because it would be classified as "original research" or something. I have no sources. I do think the article that appeared in the SF Chronicle (in 1977 or was it 1978?) was called "The Day Eden Died", or something very similar. This all happened before the intertubes and so the information is very sketchy for "reliable sources".

There was indeed an armed confrontation between the feds and a gold miner, but that was years before the events that led to the shootout at Denny. It would also be very strange for me to write about it, because it is kind of personal. I think about one of the victims fairly often, to this day...it would be weird to write about him. Plus BLP may play a part in writing about it, especially without sources.

But in a nutshell, an argument started between two gold miners ( or would be gold miners...), one was killed by the other. Later in the day, two young men related either by blood or marriage went after the murderer and in the ensuing shootout , one was injured and the other mortally wounded. The murderer was also shot a number of times, but escaped and was captured alive. It did take several hours for law enforcement and medical aid to get up to Denny, as you know, it's pretty isolated and helicopters weren't available then, (I guess). I wish I could locate that SF Chronicle article. It's either lost or tucked into something that I can't find...it's been 35 years after all.  :(

Hope that helps a bit. I love Humboldt/Trinity..I grew up there and it's still "God's country" to me. Gingervlad (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Colorado

[edit]

Thank you for your recent addition of articles about National Register of Historic Places in Colorado. If WikiProject Colorado can be of any help, please contact me. Yours aye,  Buaidh  15:38, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kinder's

[edit]

Hello Yoctownyocol,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kinder's for deletion, because it seems to be an advertisement, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I accept that you may not have intended the article to be an advertisement, but it certainly reads like one: promotional in tone, including superlatives, and with no independent references. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:22, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kinder's, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Pablo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kinder's for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kinder's is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinder's until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antioch, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deer Valley High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:24, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of USN ships

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your edits to List of current ships of the United States Navy. Unfortunately, I had to revert one. The ship you noted as decommissioned is still listed as commissioned on the naval register. You will note that I had to revert another editor on the ship's own article as well for the same reason. I don't doubt that a decomm ceremony took place, but without a reliable source, it is considered as original research, and has to be removed.

Another issue is that when ships are added or removed from the list, could you please update the totals on the page? I appreciate your help keeping the page up to date. Thanks! - thewolfchild 19:13, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 April

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 June

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Yoctownyocol. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template {{PD-notice}} after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself, and that it's okay to copy verbatim. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:25, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as USS Monterey (CG-61). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as USS Pinckney. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 04:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to USS Port Royal (CG-73) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trinity County, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helena. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]