User talk:Ziggy 2milli

Welcome!

Hello, Ziggy 2milli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Marlo Hampton.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Marlo Hampton.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Marlo Hampton.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Marlo Hampton.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marlo Hampton.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Marlo Hampton.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 23:50, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ziggy 2milli, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:Marlo Hampton have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:34, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Ziggy 2milli. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 11:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whpq (talk) 11:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An extended welcome

Hi Ziggy 2milli. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 15:06, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (YNW Melly) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating YNW Melly, Ziggy 2milli!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on YNW Melly, but note that other editors have wondered if he is notable enough for Wikipedia. The article could be improved with citations to more media notices about his music or concert performances, if there are any. Good luck.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:05, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marlo Hampton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marlo Hampton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Stanley Appleford (talk) 20:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of YNW Melly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YNW Melly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YNW Melly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:58, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Doğukan Yüce

Hello, Ziggy 2milli,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Doğukan Yüce should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doğukan Yüce .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:42, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Doğukan Yüce. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:56, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ziggy 2milli - Second and final warning. If you remove the AfD notice again, you are likely to be blocked. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:53, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been reviewed by an administrator that’s why I removed it (Ziggy 2milli (talk) 06:28, 26 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

It was not reviewed by an administrator but a page reviewer, who did nothing but determine that it does not have to be removed immediately for glaring issues. That is not a seal of approval; it is still open for deletion discussions on grounds of lack of notability. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you guys glad and happy to delete a page someone created that has refrences from different sources that talked about the page

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to YNW Melly seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please read WP:NOTPROMO. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social-media platform appropriate for assertions that an artist is "hot". Please read a number of Wikipedia articles to understand the tone that is appropriate for this platform. If you have a connection with this artist through which you gain anything of value by publicizing him, you should only be making requests for changes to content on the article's talk page, not adding content. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Justin Klosky

Hello, Ziggy 2milli,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Justin Klosky should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Klosky .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:21, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rojas on the beat

Hello, Ziggy 2milli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rojas on the beat".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 09:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Distortedd

Hello, Ziggy 2milli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Distortedd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Williams uchemba

Hello, Ziggy 2milli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Williams uchemba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 15:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Savii 3rd

Hello, Ziggy 2milli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Savii 3rd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 07:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Alex Quin

Hello, Ziggy 2milli,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Elmidae and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Alex Quin should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Quin .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elmidae}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shyon Keoppel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shyon Keoppel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyon Keoppel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theredproject (talk) 14:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI and Promotional editing

Hello Ziggy 2milli, I have noticed a trend in your articles you have created over the last year, towards Promotional tone, of subjects of questionable notability, with which it seems like you might have a conflict of interest with. Elmidae has also noted this, and brought one of your articles to AFD. I note the conflict of interest, as the images/photographs declared as own work and are also nom'd for deletion on Commons for this reason. Your intent (as declared in the edit summaries, is often very clearly about SEO. Here are some of the pages, though there are few other drafts:

Alex Quin currently at AFD
Shyon Keoppel currently at AFD
Luca Maggiora - "I want it to start showing on google as a Wikipedia article"
Paul Fabritz
Draft:Le Wuz
Draft:Easton Schirra
YNW Melly at the time he was unlikely to be notable, though has subsequently become notable. Concurrently, the page has gone through an almost complete rewriting by over 100 users, thus your original edits have almost entirely been replace.

Would you like to declare any conflicts of interest, or paid editing here. Would you like to clarify this situation? --Theredproject (talk) 15:32, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Luieville

Hello, Ziggy 2milli,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Elmidae and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Luieville should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luieville .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elmidae}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:55, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I#Ziggy 2milli

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^Bori! 19:31, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 20:20, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ziggy 2milli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I wasn't paid to write any of these articles it is a false accusations

Decline reason:

This isn't plausible on its face. You are welcome to make another unblock request going into substantially more detail about the low quality article creations and other concerns raised. Yamla (talk) 21:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why else would you be obsessed with making sure Google could index them as quickly as possible, if not to fulfil a contract? —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^Bori! 20:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the $60,000 question.

(I'm not guessing.) -11:33, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Justin Klosky (May 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Scope creep was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Article on subject already deleted via Afd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Klosky on 19 January 2019

scope_creep^Talk 16:00, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Le Wuz

Hello, Ziggy 2milli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Le Wuz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Easton Schirra

Hello, Ziggy 2milli. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Easton Schirra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 13:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]