Wikipedia:Articles for deletion//Q
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per WP:SNOW. It might be possible to write an encyclopedic article about this subject but this is not that article. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- /Q (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Obvious violation of WP:NOTHOWTO, nearly no prose whatsoever. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:49, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- 'WP:SNOW Delete: for any number of reasons. Toddst1 (talk) 23:08, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article is a brief description of /Q. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I Jethrobot (talk) 23:13, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete article is badly written, and wrong (paths don't use slash, they use backslash in DOS, it's called a "colon" not a Colin). 65.94.47.63 (talk) 05:18, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- badly written, incomprehensible, unsourced and inaccurate. Reyk YO! 22:27, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for multiple issues, not the least of which is WP:NOTHOWTO. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 18:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- /SNOW /NOTHOWTO /Q Delete - "'Colin' Represents The Colin ASCII Character" ??? also the article is incorrect, the flag is accepted as an argument by some programs and built-in commands in the MS-DOS system - although possibly just a translation/ESL issue. OSborn arfcontribs. 23:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete why not speedy? W Nowicki (talk) 23:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy was declined. And a PROD was removed. So here we are. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 23:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
