Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/11:11 Wish
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 03:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 11:11 Wish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete. Quaint and all, but not particularly relevant. Wikipedia is not for useless made up stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelseyak90 (talk • contribs) 13:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, no mainstream support or third-party references. Contested prod, possibly original research. WWGB (talk) 03:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete probably nonsense altogether--the one web source given does not support the article. DGG (talk) 03:20, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Complete unsourcable garbage. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 03:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete...Wikipedia is not for useless made up stuff. RockManQ (talk) 04:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I thought I had come across all the superstitions along these lines, but this a new one on me. I cannot find any evidence that this is not just made up. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 04:34, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- I have actually heard of this before, nonetheless this article is garabage. Dunkergilligan (talk) 05:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:MADEUP, WP:OR, WP:NFT. End of. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 05:18, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete — this is shit that someone just WP:MADEUP. MuZemike (talk) 06:11, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Kudos to the author for writing a clever satire about myth vs. fact tables and elaborate rules for superstititions. It has no place on Wikipedia, of course, and will be deleted in less time than it took the author to think this up, but it's a cut above the usual WP:MADEUP stuff. Mandsford (talk) 14:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete satire or not, it has to go. For what it's worth it reads exactly like the usual WP:MADEUP stuff, to me anyway. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. And then immediately delete. 69.14.42.33 (talk) 12:21, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It appears the article's time is up. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
