Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/971p

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

971p

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2009. I can't see how this monitor is notable - no other samsung monitor has a WP article Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect per WP:PRODUCT.Charles (talk) 13:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No notability and it is just a model of a monitor. Frmorrison (talk) 03:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All I am seeing is "Overview" articles which just have stats and price. None of the sources have decided it is worth writing a paragraph or two. It wouldn't bother me to redirect after deleting, but this particular piece of hardware appears to not be noteworthy. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 21:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - Not much info on it & no evdience of any notability neither. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:24, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obvious delete per nom. and comments above. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:41, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.