Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AB Elise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 00:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AB Elise

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Title is a company, article is only about a "product" design, no indication of notability per WP:CORP Deunanknute (talk) 17:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How about moving this to Eco-city 2020 and removing the spam? QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:15, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

commentI don't think "Eco-city 2020" should get an article at all. It's a conceptual design. I haven't found any reference to it being "officially" considered for construction. Deunanknute (talk) 14:09, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Many conceptual designs have an article, including those who are less notable (by google results) than this design. For example, Scandinavian Tower and Miglin-Beitler Skyneedle. --Virtualerian (talk) 16:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment from a quick search; both[1] of those[2] appear to have been approved, then cancelled. Deunanknute (talk) 17:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 07:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, From what I can gather it's just proposals at the moment, I'm assuming this is being built in 2020 which if that's the case than this should be recreated in 2017/2018 when things should've hopefully moved ahead. –Davey2010^Talk 02:20, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.