Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Quiet Place (film series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Mz7 (talk) 03:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Quiet Place (film series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion from mainspace (no objection to draftifying) because I find two actual films to be too small of a set for a film series article. Here, we simply have one film and its sequel. It is too early to know if the spinoff will be produced. Furthermore, such articles are simply consolidations of details from individual film articles. With two films, when comparing details, a reader can go from one article to another easily. With three films, a reader can go from an individual film's article to the film series article to readily see how all three films compare. For a similar comparison, per MOS:FILM#Navigation, we don't have director navboxes if there are only two films because there's no need for that bird's-eye view if there is only one other topic. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 22:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify for now. Seems like this article has potential if a third film, spin-off, or other media is introduced. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 23:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify. Not ready for prime time. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 06:51, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify content and redirect page to A Quiet Place (film)#Sequel.★Trekker (talk) 13:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that's a good redirect. It just discusses the second film. I don't think there has to be a redirect; it can just be a red link, and any reader who happens to try to search for it can click on either article that shows up in internal results. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 23:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify The article is not very short, and it contains a lot of references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryzhao123 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.