Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Lateef Usta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 18:01, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Lateef Usta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to rely entirely on primary sources and fail the notability guidelines at WP:PROF. Its claims to notability, such as "He is also creating pave for professional art researchers through his lectures, papers and publications", appear unsubstantiated by the sources, which simply confirm the existence of his publications. One claim even cites his own Wikipedia article as its own reference, which is an impressive tautology, but not super-convincing. Khazar (talk) 02:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Absurd promotional article for a person who fails WP:BIO, WP:RS, etc. Contains ridiculous puffery such as "His contributions towards Art and Culture are blooming day by day and this promising curator is expected to make great and historic contributions in the arena of Art, Culture and Heritage." Should be scrubbed off the face of the Earth for that sentence alone. Qworty (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note. I don't believe it's significant to the vote here, but just so no one else sees this and decides to track them down too, I've gone ahead and reverted this user's unsourced, somewhat peacock additions of Usta's accomplishments to several other articles. Khazar (talk) 14:50, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. does not meet WP:PROF or WP:N--Sodabottle (talk) 04:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. lack of significance; not wiki article Raman raman 09:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:PROF and WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 04:22, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.