Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aiplex Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aiplex Software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear and blatant advertising with nothing here but what the company would advertise about itself, and naturally that's what other sources I found are saying, and quite blatantly at it, therefore also considering we know articles and subjects of this nature are going to have blatant paid advertising, there's simply nothing else to consider, simply see the history for the multiple company-involved accounts (especially Airplexsoftwarebangalore and Aiplex12). There's literally nothing else to suggest anything else especially beyond this blatancy. SwisterTwister talk 05:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:46, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. It seems to be difficult to find current information--tey don't seem to have updated their web site since 2012, But there are two substantial references: 1. ' "10 Facts Everyone Should Know About Anonymous" 'Collective Evolution October 22, 2016 [1] (a site I am not familiar with) contains in a long well-written article 2 good paragraphs of how this firm used Anonymous's techniques. The section starts "This Indian company worked on behalf of the record industry and the movie industry. They launched attacks to sink websites that provided copyrighted content, like The Pirate Bay...." and "Rival 'fakes' website & e-mail ID of anti-piracy firm, lures away clients Deccan Herald Nov 16, 2016, DHNS [2],( a not very reliable source), but a good article awhich makes clear that this is the principal company at least in India,. DGG ( talk ) 19:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a WP:MILL company with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:19, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent justification of notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:15, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom Light2021 (talk) 06:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.